having trouble with that OU-TT game... on the one hand, homefield has been huge in the Big 12... OU has a huge homefield advantage...
on the other hand, i have seen most of the games both teams have played this year, and there is no doubt in my mind TT is the better team... Crabtree trumps every single play-maker on OU... that combo is just unfair at the CFB level... unreal! mostly, the TT defense is solid, and the OU defense is not...
still debating... with this line was either 3 or 8... would be an easier call... really hard not to take the better team getting almost a TD... hate that homefield though...
0
having trouble with that OU-TT game... on the one hand, homefield has been huge in the Big 12... OU has a huge homefield advantage...
on the other hand, i have seen most of the games both teams have played this year, and there is no doubt in my mind TT is the better team... Crabtree trumps every single play-maker on OU... that combo is just unfair at the CFB level... unreal! mostly, the TT defense is solid, and the OU defense is not...
still debating... with this line was either 3 or 8... would be an easier call... really hard not to take the better team getting almost a TD... hate that homefield though...
Great card last week except the antics that occurred during the USC game but overall great job! Love that Oklahoma pick was on them when I looked ahead of schedule. VA Tech is a solid pick and so is Rutgers! I will lean Boise State though. I rarely follow the WAC and rarely pick a team unless someone straight up convinces me. Good luck!
0
Great card last week except the antics that occurred during the USC game but overall great job! Love that Oklahoma pick was on them when I looked ahead of schedule. VA Tech is a solid pick and so is Rutgers! I will lean Boise State though. I rarely follow the WAC and rarely pick a team unless someone straight up convinces me. Good luck!
Nos what do you think about the Ohio St game. I took them early and gave up 19. Im reading now that Michigan QB and RB are possible out. So should kick the line up pretty fast.
0
Nos what do you think about the Ohio St game. I took them early and gave up 19. Im reading now that Michigan QB and RB are possible out. So should kick the line up pretty fast.
looks sweet Nos, always check your plays and enjoy the info, I'm on ECU at + 7 and NCSU at + 11 so far , was wondering how you felts about those plays, will also pounce on THE UNDER in ECU game at the right moment -GL this weekend, oh yeah Ball State - CMU should be a good one, I'm poppin a chubby catchin 7 and can only grin and wait for the that line to pop to 7.5 and probably more as the hammer comes on the defeated ball state cards - Chipewas rule the nite however
0
looks sweet Nos, always check your plays and enjoy the info, I'm on ECU at + 7 and NCSU at + 11 so far , was wondering how you felts about those plays, will also pounce on THE UNDER in ECU game at the right moment -GL this weekend, oh yeah Ball State - CMU should be a good one, I'm poppin a chubby catchin 7 and can only grin and wait for the that line to pop to 7.5 and probably more as the hammer comes on the defeated ball state cards - Chipewas rule the nite however
Damn nos, VT alum here and about to make Duke one of my biggest plays of the week. I dont think Tech can blow anybody out and Duke has a pretty respectable defense. VT would'nt have covered this spread at home against Western Kentucky. Wondering what angle you are playing here. GL to you this week
0
Damn nos, VT alum here and about to make Duke one of my biggest plays of the week. I dont think Tech can blow anybody out and Duke has a pretty respectable defense. VT would'nt have covered this spread at home against Western Kentucky. Wondering what angle you are playing here. GL to you this week
Oklahoma may shape up like OK vs Mizzou did the last couple years.
I was hoping Illinois would be a dog but that was probably too greedy. They looked good on defense last week and Juice usually follows a bad performance with a good game.
Looks like I should jump on Boise St now. I wanted to see if the line would drop.
0
Leaning Oklahoma, Illinois, and Boise St:
Oklahoma may shape up like OK vs Mizzou did the last couple years.
I was hoping Illinois would be a dog but that was probably too greedy. They looked good on defense last week and Juice usually follows a bad performance with a good game.
Looks like I should jump on Boise St now. I wanted to see if the line would drop.
gotstaks - anything 2 units or more is large, VT and OU this week
jkel - could not take Mich, so would lean Ohio St although not really running up the score at home much this year
nc1capper - hoping that CMU number goes to TD+ as well
pimp, bibenbi - hard to make a great case for VT that barely scores 17 most weeks, just not believing Duke enjoys playing team like VT (41-5 avg last 3 yrs) and somewhere along the line defense or special teams may have some luck as well, plus Lewis being banged up a possible factor
bustin - hard to make a case against TT, mostly a feel play that TT cannot run the Big 12 table..and a 'fair' OU offense and HF doesn't hurt
LJ - hoping this Illinois deal is not a repeat of Ill/Wisky a couple weeks ago, NW has also had their number past few years (other than last), mainly a hunch like you said that Williams and Illini bounce back along with NW fairly beat up
0
all
gotstaks - anything 2 units or more is large, VT and OU this week
jkel - could not take Mich, so would lean Ohio St although not really running up the score at home much this year
nc1capper - hoping that CMU number goes to TD+ as well
pimp, bibenbi - hard to make a great case for VT that barely scores 17 most weeks, just not believing Duke enjoys playing team like VT (41-5 avg last 3 yrs) and somewhere along the line defense or special teams may have some luck as well, plus Lewis being banged up a possible factor
bustin - hard to make a case against TT, mostly a feel play that TT cannot run the Big 12 table..and a 'fair' OU offense and HF doesn't hurt
LJ - hoping this Illinois deal is not a repeat of Ill/Wisky a couple weeks ago, NW has also had their number past few years (other than last), mainly a hunch like you said that Williams and Illini bounce back along with NW fairly beat up
Wondering why you like Boise? It seems to me everyone is on Boise. I dont think this Boise team is as strong as in years past, granted Nevada is so up and down this year it is hard to tell which team will show up. I know Ault and company have had this game circled on the calendar all year. Nevada has not been drawing many fans at home, but I think there will be more for this big game. I also think if Boise makes a BCS game, they might get beat up like Hawaii this year. There only quality win was @ Oregon so it is hard to grade how good they are. Just have a feeling, but I am partially bias as a Nevada alum.
0
Nos
Wondering why you like Boise? It seems to me everyone is on Boise. I dont think this Boise team is as strong as in years past, granted Nevada is so up and down this year it is hard to tell which team will show up. I know Ault and company have had this game circled on the calendar all year. Nevada has not been drawing many fans at home, but I think there will be more for this big game. I also think if Boise makes a BCS game, they might get beat up like Hawaii this year. There only quality win was @ Oregon so it is hard to grade how good they are. Just have a feeling, but I am partially bias as a Nevada alum.
hoopsprof - working on a couple scores and comments shortly
Va Tech 30 Duke 3 - Hokies have owned series (41-5 avg last 3 yrs) and offense gradually improving averaging 23.7 over last six games. Duke gradually getting beat up (including QB Lewis) and playing VT is not the solution
Oklahoma 45 Texas Tech 28 - in addition to obvious huge game, Sooners looking for revenge for last year's 34-27 loss in Lubbock and has 'held' Red Raider to 23.5 ppg over last 4 in series. OU offense not contained entire year 35+ in every game this year.
Rutgers 38 Army 13 - looking for similar to Rice game except Rutgers may have the defense to keep back door closed. RU rolled to 41-6 win last year including 25-6 first down edge. Army can only run and RU pretty solid in that area most games. Rout.
Boise St 38 Nevada 24 - Boise St won last 2 in Reno by 48-14 avg and Wolfpack has shown a knack for laying eggs in big games in recent years. Broncos defensive advantage could be important here
Illinois 30 NW 20 - thinking Illinois rebounds here while NW may have a letdown (even though Michigan is not good this year). Illini had a 32-21 FD edge in last year's win and NW not overly tough homefield, cannot resist opportunity for Illinois burn some more money after having them in similar spot laying 2.5 in Madison a couple weeks ago
will be adding a couple more later, line movement heading the right direction so holding off GL all
0
hoopsprof - working on a couple scores and comments shortly
Va Tech 30 Duke 3 - Hokies have owned series (41-5 avg last 3 yrs) and offense gradually improving averaging 23.7 over last six games. Duke gradually getting beat up (including QB Lewis) and playing VT is not the solution
Oklahoma 45 Texas Tech 28 - in addition to obvious huge game, Sooners looking for revenge for last year's 34-27 loss in Lubbock and has 'held' Red Raider to 23.5 ppg over last 4 in series. OU offense not contained entire year 35+ in every game this year.
Rutgers 38 Army 13 - looking for similar to Rice game except Rutgers may have the defense to keep back door closed. RU rolled to 41-6 win last year including 25-6 first down edge. Army can only run and RU pretty solid in that area most games. Rout.
Boise St 38 Nevada 24 - Boise St won last 2 in Reno by 48-14 avg and Wolfpack has shown a knack for laying eggs in big games in recent years. Broncos defensive advantage could be important here
Illinois 30 NW 20 - thinking Illinois rebounds here while NW may have a letdown (even though Michigan is not good this year). Illini had a 32-21 FD edge in last year's win and NW not overly tough homefield, cannot resist opportunity for Illinois burn some more money after having them in similar spot laying 2.5 in Madison a couple weeks ago
will be adding a couple more later, line movement heading the right direction so holding off GL all
agree with most but got T Tech +7 , Tech has too much offense to be held under 30 Nost. T Tech and the Over 73 cant't lose both. OKlahoma Defense is not that great. BOL bud
0
agree with most but got T Tech +7 , Tech has too much offense to be held under 30 Nost. T Tech and the Over 73 cant't lose both. OKlahoma Defense is not that great. BOL bud
any thoughts on AF +19. i seem to be the only one on this, and it just seems too good to be true, am i crazy? like the card so far NOS. leanerd NW at first but will stay away from this game, one game i'm against you on is VT laying 17, but duke has been playing pretty poor lately, so maybe you got something there. BOL. also thinking BYU can cover the 6 at utah
0
any thoughts on AF +19. i seem to be the only one on this, and it just seems too good to be true, am i crazy? like the card so far NOS. leanerd NW at first but will stay away from this game, one game i'm against you on is VT laying 17, but duke has been playing pretty poor lately, so maybe you got something there. BOL. also thinking BYU can cover the 6 at utah
landis, AF looks like a possible for sure, as we know tho AF is a one-way ground only kind of attack, happens to play in to the strength of TCU (run defense) my selection will lean towards THE UNDER and look for the horned frogs to shoot down the fly boys and grind out a 28 - 10 type win --BOL--
0
landis, AF looks like a possible for sure, as we know tho AF is a one-way ground only kind of attack, happens to play in to the strength of TCU (run defense) my selection will lean towards THE UNDER and look for the horned frogs to shoot down the fly boys and grind out a 28 - 10 type win --BOL--
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
. Wondering what angle you are playing here. GL to you this week
I wanted to see if the line would drop.
GL all
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
