Art thou ready to reap in gluttonous financial benefits from hither picks that shall overwelmeth thy sportsbooks?
The second to smallest card of the year yesterday was quite aggravating as I had to settle for a 1-1 record but that's why I'm especially pumped for tonight's activity. Most of the games look playable and I just bought extra two piggy banks, so I'm ready to win some pennies.
I'm waiting for the Bosox/O's lineups. After I post this game, I'm off for a short run, and then I will have the rest of the 7 picks. Good luck to all.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Good evening ladies and gentlemen,
Art thou ready to reap in gluttonous financial benefits from hither picks that shall overwelmeth thy sportsbooks?
The second to smallest card of the year yesterday was quite aggravating as I had to settle for a 1-1 record but that's why I'm especially pumped for tonight's activity. Most of the games look playable and I just bought extra two piggy banks, so I'm ready to win some pennies.
I'm waiting for the Bosox/O's lineups. After I post this game, I'm off for a short run, and then I will have the rest of the 7 picks. Good luck to all.
JUST A THOUGHT !!!!!!!!!!! DO YOU KNOW IF YOU CAME HERE TO LAS VEGAS ,, YOU COULD ACTUALLY MAKE REAL DOUGH !!!1,, ( not that u aren't already ) ,,and EVERYTHING that u put ON-LINE would mean 10x MORE ----- FROM WHERE UR AT !!!!!!!!!!!!! ANYWAY,, JUST A THOUGHT !! write bakk when u can,,,ALLGOOD , DUDE
0
JUST A THOUGHT !!!!!!!!!!! DO YOU KNOW IF YOU CAME HERE TO LAS VEGAS ,, YOU COULD ACTUALLY MAKE REAL DOUGH !!!1,, ( not that u aren't already ) ,,and EVERYTHING that u put ON-LINE would mean 10x MORE ----- FROM WHERE UR AT !!!!!!!!!!!!! ANYWAY,, JUST A THOUGHT !! write bakk when u can,,,ALLGOOD , DUDE
there was a lengthy dialog in yesterday's thread which criticed/ and defended lan for picking favorites.
that criticism gets tiresome, imo.
we all know that when you have a propensity to focus on favorites ( and lan's record suggests that he does lean toward favorites ) then you need a healthy win percentage.
give credit to lan for eliminating those favorites that do not measure up, and isolating those which have value according to his ratings.
For those of you who remain doubters, I suggest the following strategy:
Play on dogs only. Play on only those dogs where lan has passed on the game.( Like you would have had KC at +200something yesterday)
If he doesn;t like the fav, it is with good reason.
So play the dog.
my .02 worth.
lan- I like many others appreciate the time you put in on bases.
0
there was a lengthy dialog in yesterday's thread which criticed/ and defended lan for picking favorites.
that criticism gets tiresome, imo.
we all know that when you have a propensity to focus on favorites ( and lan's record suggests that he does lean toward favorites ) then you need a healthy win percentage.
give credit to lan for eliminating those favorites that do not measure up, and isolating those which have value according to his ratings.
For those of you who remain doubters, I suggest the following strategy:
Play on dogs only. Play on only those dogs where lan has passed on the game.( Like you would have had KC at +200something yesterday)
If he doesn;t like the fav, it is with good reason.
So play the dog.
my .02 worth.
lan- I like many others appreciate the time you put in on bases.
JUST A THOUGHT !!!!!!!!!!! DO YOU KNOW IF YOU CAME HERE TO LAS VEGAS ,, YOU COULD ACTUALLY MAKE REAL DOUGH !!!1,, ( not that u aren't already ) ,,and EVERYTHING that u put ON-LINE would mean 10x MORE ----- FROM WHERE UR AT !!!!!!!!!!!!! ANYWAY,, JUST A THOUGHT !! write bakk when u can,,,ALLGOOD , DUDE
This is a possibility but only much further down the road. Vegas shuts you out once you prove you are a sharp, so I would need to hire runners, which is a pain and costly. Also, I would be swallowing down -110 juice which is specifically making 10x less than what I am making now.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jcaperell:
JUST A THOUGHT !!!!!!!!!!! DO YOU KNOW IF YOU CAME HERE TO LAS VEGAS ,, YOU COULD ACTUALLY MAKE REAL DOUGH !!!1,, ( not that u aren't already ) ,,and EVERYTHING that u put ON-LINE would mean 10x MORE ----- FROM WHERE UR AT !!!!!!!!!!!!! ANYWAY,, JUST A THOUGHT !! write bakk when u can,,,ALLGOOD , DUDE
This is a possibility but only much further down the road. Vegas shuts you out once you prove you are a sharp, so I would need to hire runners, which is a pain and costly. Also, I would be swallowing down -110 juice which is specifically making 10x less than what I am making now.
there was a lengthy dialog in yesterday's thread which criticed/ and defended lan for picking favorites.
that criticism gets tiresome, imo.
we all know that when you have a propensity to focus on favorites ( and lan's record suggests that he does lean toward favorites ) then you need a healthy win percentage.
give credit to lan for eliminating those favorites that do not measure up, and isolating those which have value according to his ratings.
For those of you who remain doubters, I suggest the following strategy:
Play on dogs only. Play on only those dogs where lan has passed on the game.( Like you would have had KC at +200something yesterday)
If he doesn;t like the fav, it is with good reason.
So play the dog.
my .02 worth.
lan- I like many others appreciate the time you put in on bases.
Thanks for sticking up for me.
I would be willing to bet you would about break even playing those dogs you talk about, but I haven't analyzed them, so not sure.
0
Quote Originally Posted by taurus:
there was a lengthy dialog in yesterday's thread which criticed/ and defended lan for picking favorites.
that criticism gets tiresome, imo.
we all know that when you have a propensity to focus on favorites ( and lan's record suggests that he does lean toward favorites ) then you need a healthy win percentage.
give credit to lan for eliminating those favorites that do not measure up, and isolating those which have value according to his ratings.
For those of you who remain doubters, I suggest the following strategy:
Play on dogs only. Play on only those dogs where lan has passed on the game.( Like you would have had KC at +200something yesterday)
If he doesn;t like the fav, it is with good reason.
So play the dog.
my .02 worth.
lan- I like many others appreciate the time you put in on bases.
Thanks for sticking up for me.
I would be willing to bet you would about break even playing those dogs you talk about, but I haven't analyzed them, so not sure.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.