Rays: Play to -110. OK, so a very good pitcher has a bad night. Also unusual is that home teams went 12-3 yesterday. I figure some of that is guys just getting back in the rhythm and groove of daily play. Ramirez ids the undervalued guy here and the Jays are not unbeatable, home, away or anywhere else.
Marlins: Play to -147. Billingsley has been a disappointment thus far, Koehler is undervalued, and the Phillies stole one last night that was well in hand when Fernandez exited. Revenge is sweet.
Pirates: I suppose those that would not honor Fiers last night will want to bounce back today. Liriano is a guy you can trust to do that, and the Brewers are a much weaker team versus lefty than righty. Brewers favored last night, Pirates tonight, both based on Fiers and Liriano versus Morton and Nelson. Home field has nothing to do with it, or the results.
Bounce back day for the roadies.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
Rays: Play to -110. OK, so a very good pitcher has a bad night. Also unusual is that home teams went 12-3 yesterday. I figure some of that is guys just getting back in the rhythm and groove of daily play. Ramirez ids the undervalued guy here and the Jays are not unbeatable, home, away or anywhere else.
Marlins: Play to -147. Billingsley has been a disappointment thus far, Koehler is undervalued, and the Phillies stole one last night that was well in hand when Fernandez exited. Revenge is sweet.
Pirates: I suppose those that would not honor Fiers last night will want to bounce back today. Liriano is a guy you can trust to do that, and the Brewers are a much weaker team versus lefty than righty. Brewers favored last night, Pirates tonight, both based on Fiers and Liriano versus Morton and Nelson. Home field has nothing to do with it, or the results.
Key- Has no superstitions whatsoever regarding anything so we can forget Charlie_X as a bad luck character.
Charlie_X - I can appreciate your support and enthusiasm, but you could tone it down a little and a good way would be simply to not respond to those that don't seem to like your contributions. Let it go, let it be.
Everyone else - Same thing, let it go, let it be. This is a public forum and you can't control what anyone posts. Aggravating the situation will not get rid of anyone you dislike.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
Key- Has no superstitions whatsoever regarding anything so we can forget Charlie_X as a bad luck character.
Charlie_X - I can appreciate your support and enthusiasm, but you could tone it down a little and a good way would be simply to not respond to those that don't seem to like your contributions. Let it go, let it be.
Everyone else - Same thing, let it go, let it be. This is a public forum and you can't control what anyone posts. Aggravating the situation will not get rid of anyone you dislike.
Dickey has started agst the Rays 3 times already this year and the Jays have lost each time. You have your system and it has worked extremely well thus far this MLB season. But do you not think the law of averages will come into play here. That is a big part of wagering. Not the highest of odds that a Dickey started game will lose to the Rays a 4th time(adding he is at home does not urt his chances to break thru either).. On the other side,your taking the same underdog twice in 2 days has a lot going for it,with your success this year. I want to take the Rays but something has to give so I will root for them from the sidelines instead,as Dickey's law of averages is too much for me here. GL,Key!!
Dickey has started agst the Rays 3 times already this year and the Jays have lost each time. You have your system and it has worked extremely well thus far this MLB season. But do you not think the law of averages will come into play here. That is a big part of wagering. Not the highest of odds that a Dickey started game will lose to the Rays a 4th time(adding he is at home does not urt his chances to break thru either).. On the other side,your taking the same underdog twice in 2 days has a lot going for it,with your success this year. I want to take the Rays but something has to give so I will root for them from the sidelines instead,as Dickey's law of averages is too much for me here. GL,Key!!
Key- Has no superstitions whatsoever regarding anything so we can forget Charlie_X as a bad luck character.
Charlie_X - I can appreciate your support and enthusiasm, but you could tone it down a little and a good way would be simply to not respond to those that don't seem to like your contributions. Let it go, let it be.
Everyone else - Same thing, let it go, let it be. This is a public forum and you can't control what anyone posts. Aggravating the situation will not get rid of anyone you dislike.
Thank you for addressing this entire situation, Key. I knew that you wouldn't subscribe to the "mush" nonsense these moronic imbeciles are trying to pin on me.
I will take your suggestion to heart, and I won't respond to any of the cretins who badger me with their aspersions and barbs. That does nothing but exacerbate and inflame the situation and is very negative. I will indeed ignore those who harass me, since their only reason for making negative comments to me is to bait me to respond in kind. You can be rest assured there will be no more replying from me to those polyps.
It's all about generating positive energy in your MLB threads, and I think you putting this issue to rest once and for all will enable that.
Key- Has no superstitions whatsoever regarding anything so we can forget Charlie_X as a bad luck character.
Charlie_X - I can appreciate your support and enthusiasm, but you could tone it down a little and a good way would be simply to not respond to those that don't seem to like your contributions. Let it go, let it be.
Everyone else - Same thing, let it go, let it be. This is a public forum and you can't control what anyone posts. Aggravating the situation will not get rid of anyone you dislike.
Thank you for addressing this entire situation, Key. I knew that you wouldn't subscribe to the "mush" nonsense these moronic imbeciles are trying to pin on me.
I will take your suggestion to heart, and I won't respond to any of the cretins who badger me with their aspersions and barbs. That does nothing but exacerbate and inflame the situation and is very negative. I will indeed ignore those who harass me, since their only reason for making negative comments to me is to bait me to respond in kind. You can be rest assured there will be no more replying from me to those polyps.
It's all about generating positive energy in your MLB threads, and I think you putting this issue to rest once and for all will enable that.
Dickey has started agst the Rays 3 times already this year and the Jays have lost each time. You have your system and it has worked extremely well thus far this MLB season. But do you not think the law of averages will come into play here. That is a big part of wagering. Not the highest of odds that a Dickey started game will lose to the Rays a 4th time(adding he is at home does not urt his chances to break thru either).. On the other side,your taking the same underdog twice in 2 days has a lot going for it,with your success this year. I want to take the Rays but something has to give so I will root for them from the sidelines instead,as Dickey's law of averages is too much for me here. GL,Key!!
Please explain to me the law of averages again? Is it a big part of your wagering strategy? Please provide a quantitative assessment of how that's working out for you to date?
Dickey has started agst the Rays 3 times already this year and the Jays have lost each time. You have your system and it has worked extremely well thus far this MLB season. But do you not think the law of averages will come into play here. That is a big part of wagering. Not the highest of odds that a Dickey started game will lose to the Rays a 4th time(adding he is at home does not urt his chances to break thru either).. On the other side,your taking the same underdog twice in 2 days has a lot going for it,with your success this year. I want to take the Rays but something has to give so I will root for them from the sidelines instead,as Dickey's law of averages is too much for me here. GL,Key!!
Please explain to me the law of averages again? Is it a big part of your wagering strategy? Please provide a quantitative assessment of how that's working out for you to date?
And Charlie, yeah, just cut the enthusiasm as he said. And all the big words lol. You just look silly like a schoolgirl with a crush. We all want positive energy, but i think we ALL know no matter how positive your energy, the cards wont change in blackjack, the dice wont bounce any better and the teams we bet wont win more because of it.
And Charlie, yeah, just cut the enthusiasm as he said. And all the big words lol. You just look silly like a schoolgirl with a crush. We all want positive energy, but i think we ALL know no matter how positive your energy, the cards wont change in blackjack, the dice wont bounce any better and the teams we bet wont win more because of it.
Rays: Play to -110. OK, so a very good pitcher has a bad night. Also unusual is that home teams went 12-3 yesterday. I figure some of that is guys just getting back in the rhythm and groove of daily play. Ramirez ids the undervalued guy here and the Jays are not unbeatable, home, away or anywhere else.
Marlins: Play to -147. Billingsley has been a disappointment thus far, Koehler is undervalued, and the Phillies stole one last night that was well in hand when Fernandez exited. Revenge is sweet.
Pirates: I suppose those that would not honor Fiers last night will want to bounce back today. Liriano is a guy you can trust to do that, and the Brewers are a much weaker team versus lefty than righty. Brewers favored last night, Pirates tonight, both based on Fiers and Liriano versus Morton and Nelson. Home field has nothing to do with it, or the results.
Bounce back day for the roadies.
Agree on all 3 Key. Your logic is spot on today and I see a 3-0 day.
Rays: Play to -110. OK, so a very good pitcher has a bad night. Also unusual is that home teams went 12-3 yesterday. I figure some of that is guys just getting back in the rhythm and groove of daily play. Ramirez ids the undervalued guy here and the Jays are not unbeatable, home, away or anywhere else.
Marlins: Play to -147. Billingsley has been a disappointment thus far, Koehler is undervalued, and the Phillies stole one last night that was well in hand when Fernandez exited. Revenge is sweet.
Pirates: I suppose those that would not honor Fiers last night will want to bounce back today. Liriano is a guy you can trust to do that, and the Brewers are a much weaker team versus lefty than righty. Brewers favored last night, Pirates tonight, both based on Fiers and Liriano versus Morton and Nelson. Home field has nothing to do with it, or the results.
Bounce back day for the roadies.
Agree on all 3 Key. Your logic is spot on today and I see a 3-0 day.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.