it sure was but Gray is not even remotely close to Kershaw.
it sure was but Gray is not even remotely close to Kershaw.
The LAD line is only ridiculous if it loses. This line will just sway degenerates to take the CUB's because they "feel that it has value". Therefore, they can feel good about a loss just because it has value. Hmmmm.
The LAD line is only ridiculous if it loses. This line will just sway degenerates to take the CUB's because they "feel that it has value". Therefore, they can feel good about a loss just because it has value. Hmmmm.
The LAD line is only ridiculous if it loses. This line will just sway degenerates to take the CUB's because they "feel that it has value". Therefore, they can feel good about a loss just because it has value. Hmmmm.
degenerate reporting
The LAD line is only ridiculous if it loses. This line will just sway degenerates to take the CUB's because they "feel that it has value". Therefore, they can feel good about a loss just because it has value. Hmmmm.
degenerate reporting
The LAD line is only ridiculous if it loses. This line will just sway degenerates to take the CUB's because they "feel that it has value". Therefore, they can feel good about a loss just because it has value. Hmmmm.
The LAD line is only ridiculous if it loses. This line will just sway degenerates to take the CUB's because they "feel that it has value". Therefore, they can feel good about a loss just because it has value. Hmmmm.
if you bet baseball that's exactly what you bet....value....and if you don't think Cubs have value today, then you shouldn't be betting baseball...I'll be on Cubs and if they get whipped then so be it...if they win I wont be shocked...
if you bet baseball that's exactly what you bet....value....and if you don't think Cubs have value today, then you shouldn't be betting baseball...I'll be on Cubs and if they get whipped then so be it...if they win I wont be shocked...
The LAD line is only ridiculous if it loses. This line will just sway degenerates to take the CUB's because they "feel that it has value". Therefore, they can feel good about a loss just because it has value. Hmmmm.
This reminds of someone saying, "juice/chalk is not important because the person who wins the bet doesn't have to worry about it.".
The LAD line is only ridiculous if it loses. This line will just sway degenerates to take the CUB's because they "feel that it has value". Therefore, they can feel good about a loss just because it has value. Hmmmm.
This reminds of someone saying, "juice/chalk is not important because the person who wins the bet doesn't have to worry about it.".
This reminds of someone saying, "juice/chalk is not important because the person who wins the bet doesn't have to worry about it.".
Whhhat? Your comment reminds me of someone saying that gamblers should always bet the big dog so that they do not have to worry about incurring the juice if the dogs losses. I'll be sure and consult with you next time I lay heavy chalk in certain situations and see if you can provide valuable insight as to why I should not do it. And, yes, it's true that people do, at times, risk heavy juice given the situation.
This reminds of someone saying, "juice/chalk is not important because the person who wins the bet doesn't have to worry about it.".
Whhhat? Your comment reminds me of someone saying that gamblers should always bet the big dog so that they do not have to worry about incurring the juice if the dogs losses. I'll be sure and consult with you next time I lay heavy chalk in certain situations and see if you can provide valuable insight as to why I should not do it. And, yes, it's true that people do, at times, risk heavy juice given the situation.
Whhhat? Your comment reminds me of someone saying that gamblers should always bet the big dog so that they do not have to worry about incurring the juice if the dogs losses. I'll be sure and consult with you next time I lay heavy chalk in certain situations and see if you can provide valuable insight as to why I should not do it. And, yes, it's true that people do, at times, risk heavy juice given the situation.
It's also true that people do, at times, wage and win on a huge dog given the situation. So why is it only ok for you to assume their reason is to "feel good" in case of a loss? Oak/Tex came to mind yesterday.
Whhhat? Your comment reminds me of someone saying that gamblers should always bet the big dog so that they do not have to worry about incurring the juice if the dogs losses. I'll be sure and consult with you next time I lay heavy chalk in certain situations and see if you can provide valuable insight as to why I should not do it. And, yes, it's true that people do, at times, risk heavy juice given the situation.
It's also true that people do, at times, wage and win on a huge dog given the situation. So why is it only ok for you to assume their reason is to "feel good" in case of a loss? Oak/Tex came to mind yesterday.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.