If you have never read my wagering strategy I encourage you to do so. Whether or not you adopt is it your choice.
MLB 2012 Regular Season: 363-369 +245.87 Units 6.72% ROI
MLB 2012 Playoffs: 12-9-3 +10.29 Units 14.6% ROI
MLB 2012 @ 1 unit per play = +51.23 Net Units
5.01.2013, 2-1, +8.5 Units, +56.7% ROI
YTD – 64-78-12, -453.64 Units, -6.25% ROI
5 & 9 Innings – 4/22/13 ALWAYS Specify Pitchers – NO action plays
All plays are 5 Units Flat, unless otherwise noted
Red Sox F5 (-127) F5 (-122)(Dempster / Happ)
For some unexplainable reason bettors have a negative view of Dempster. I have news for them; he is just as rejuvenated as the rest of that team. We keep hearing the Jays will be just fine when they get this guy or that guy back, but that is happening with no visible results. If we had too low an opinion of one team and too high of the other to begin the season, well, this is May 2, 2013, and we just better get over it. Dempster is ahead of Happ at this point and he has the superior offense behind him. Thanks very much to the folks that place so much faith in “at home” as they have created a very favorable line.
Orioles F5 (+105) FG (+112) (Tillman / Blanton)
“Fly ball Joe” laying the juice versus a team that can actually hit? What is wrong with that picture? I am not the biggest Tillman fan in the world but his last couple outings have been impressive and Blanton has not yet turned in an above average performance this season. His team is 0-5 when he takes the ball and have failed to impress anyone with anything but their payroll. Payroll doesn’t win games, player performance does. False favorite.
BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
If you have never read my wagering strategy I encourage you to do so. Whether or not you adopt is it your choice.
MLB 2012 Regular Season: 363-369 +245.87 Units 6.72% ROI
MLB 2012 Playoffs: 12-9-3 +10.29 Units 14.6% ROI
MLB 2012 @ 1 unit per play = +51.23 Net Units
5.01.2013, 2-1, +8.5 Units, +56.7% ROI
YTD – 64-78-12, -453.64 Units, -6.25% ROI
5 & 9 Innings – 4/22/13 ALWAYS Specify Pitchers – NO action plays
All plays are 5 Units Flat, unless otherwise noted
Red Sox F5 (-127) F5 (-122)(Dempster / Happ)
For some unexplainable reason bettors have a negative view of Dempster. I have news for them; he is just as rejuvenated as the rest of that team. We keep hearing the Jays will be just fine when they get this guy or that guy back, but that is happening with no visible results. If we had too low an opinion of one team and too high of the other to begin the season, well, this is May 2, 2013, and we just better get over it. Dempster is ahead of Happ at this point and he has the superior offense behind him. Thanks very much to the folks that place so much faith in “at home” as they have created a very favorable line.
Orioles F5 (+105) FG (+112) (Tillman / Blanton)
“Fly ball Joe” laying the juice versus a team that can actually hit? What is wrong with that picture? I am not the biggest Tillman fan in the world but his last couple outings have been impressive and Blanton has not yet turned in an above average performance this season. His team is 0-5 when he takes the ball and have failed to impress anyone with anything but their payroll. Payroll doesn’t win games, player performance does. False favorite.
LAA is 8-2 home vs Balt, Balt is 4-0 on thursdays / LAA is 0-3 on thursdays. LAA is 6-4 Home vs RHP / Balt is 7-4 away vs RHP. Avgerage Score in Series LAA 5.5 - Balt 4.1. Tillman has never pitched at LAA, Blanton is 4-3 SU & 4-3 o/u vs Balt / Blanton is 2-2 SU & 2-2 o/u Home vs Balt/
0
Quote Originally Posted by RLeith35:
LAA is 50-28 vs Balt
LAA is 8-2 home vs Balt, Balt is 4-0 on thursdays / LAA is 0-3 on thursdays. LAA is 6-4 Home vs RHP / Balt is 7-4 away vs RHP. Avgerage Score in Series LAA 5.5 - Balt 4.1. Tillman has never pitched at LAA, Blanton is 4-3 SU & 4-3 o/u vs Balt / Blanton is 2-2 SU & 2-2 o/u Home vs Balt/
LAA is 8-2 home vs Balt, Balt is 4-0 on thursdays / LAA is 0-3 on thursdays. LAA is 6-4 Home vs RHP / Balt is 7-4 away vs RHP. Avgerage Score in Series LAA 5.5 - Balt 4.1. Tillman has never pitched at LAA, Blanton is 4-3 SU & 4-3 o/u vs Balt / Blanton is 2-2 SU & 2-2 o/u Home vs Balt/
Not to offend you, and I hope I don't, but I don't give a tinker's darn about 99% of the trends I read or that are available. You do what you want with trends, just don't bring them to me, OK? Same goes for ancient history. How many years does 50-28 cover? How many of those years were a completely different Orioles team that was probably 28-50 against most of the league?
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by RLeith35:
LAA is 8-2 home vs Balt, Balt is 4-0 on thursdays / LAA is 0-3 on thursdays. LAA is 6-4 Home vs RHP / Balt is 7-4 away vs RHP. Avgerage Score in Series LAA 5.5 - Balt 4.1. Tillman has never pitched at LAA, Blanton is 4-3 SU & 4-3 o/u vs Balt / Blanton is 2-2 SU & 2-2 o/u Home vs Balt/
Not to offend you, and I hope I don't, but I don't give a tinker's darn about 99% of the trends I read or that are available. You do what you want with trends, just don't bring them to me, OK? Same goes for ancient history. How many years does 50-28 cover? How many of those years were a completely different Orioles team that was probably 28-50 against most of the league?
RLeith35: Another way in which trends are deceiving. All of Blanton's "Home" starts versus Baltimore were in Oakland, and 5 or more years in the past. He faced them, on the road, with Philadelphia just once, last year. He has NEVER faced them in Anaheim.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
RLeith35: Another way in which trends are deceiving. All of Blanton's "Home" starts versus Baltimore were in Oakland, and 5 or more years in the past. He faced them, on the road, with Philadelphia just once, last year. He has NEVER faced them in Anaheim.
I was curious. I know you stated that one of your rules is to never take the home team on the RL. At what point would you take a road team favorite on the RL?
Good luck tonight
Money is a good servant, but a bad master
0
Key,
I was curious. I know you stated that one of your rules is to never take the home team on the RL. At what point would you take a road team favorite on the RL?
I was curious. I know you stated that one of your rules is to never take the home team on the RL. At what point would you take a road team favorite on the RL?
Good luck tonight
That is a little bit judgmental but basically if I need say a 58% probability to clear the money line, I would need 1.5 x that to lay a run line, so, if I need 58% to cover the money line my margin would have to be 8 x 1.5 or 62% to lay the run line. Tonight I am comfortable with Boston on the money line, but do not have quite enough margin to lay the run line. The run line is a "sexy" bet we like because it can turn the payback from a negative to a positive, but just like all exotic wagers you better be careful with it. My "Scoremeister" formula, as I like to call it, actually predict a 5-3 Boston win, but the margin of probability is just not there. I can guarantee you, if the Scoremeister said 6-3, it would be there.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by lltb43:
Key,
I was curious. I know you stated that one of your rules is to never take the home team on the RL. At what point would you take a road team favorite on the RL?
Good luck tonight
That is a little bit judgmental but basically if I need say a 58% probability to clear the money line, I would need 1.5 x that to lay a run line, so, if I need 58% to cover the money line my margin would have to be 8 x 1.5 or 62% to lay the run line. Tonight I am comfortable with Boston on the money line, but do not have quite enough margin to lay the run line. The run line is a "sexy" bet we like because it can turn the payback from a negative to a positive, but just like all exotic wagers you better be careful with it. My "Scoremeister" formula, as I like to call it, actually predict a 5-3 Boston win, but the margin of probability is just not there. I can guarantee you, if the Scoremeister said 6-3, it would be there.
I was looking at the under 4.5 (F5) based on a couple of things. Boston is only batting .239 against lefties (and they've put up some good stats lately against poor lefties). Happ shut Boston out in Toronto (F5) earlier this year. Happ threw a bad game his last time at home and I think he comes back with a much better effort. The Blue Jays are hitting only .224 against righties, so I don't expect much, if any scoring from them.
Money is a good servant, but a bad master
0
Thanks Key,
I was looking at the under 4.5 (F5) based on a couple of things. Boston is only batting .239 against lefties (and they've put up some good stats lately against poor lefties). Happ shut Boston out in Toronto (F5) earlier this year. Happ threw a bad game his last time at home and I think he comes back with a much better effort. The Blue Jays are hitting only .224 against righties, so I don't expect much, if any scoring from them.
Not to offend you, and I hope I don't, but I don't give a tinker's darn about 99% of the trends I read or that are available. You do what you want with trends, just don't bring them to me, OK? Same goes for ancient history. How many years does 50-28 cover? How many of those years were a completely different Orioles team that was probably 28-50 against most of the league?
"His team is 0-5 when he takes the ball and have failed to impress anyone with anything but their payroll."
Isn't this a "trend"?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Not to offend you, and I hope I don't, but I don't give a tinker's darn about 99% of the trends I read or that are available. You do what you want with trends, just don't bring them to me, OK? Same goes for ancient history. How many years does 50-28 cover? How many of those years were a completely different Orioles team that was probably 28-50 against most of the league?
"His team is 0-5 when he takes the ball and have failed to impress anyone with anything but their payroll."
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.