Messages

Forum Index : MLB Betting : Messages Page 1 of 3  1 2 3  
Author: [MLB Betting] Topic: Matt Cain under .500 record
dcmc34f send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Location: Georgia
#1
Posted: 4/2/2012 7:44:42 PM
Have the owners lost their mind? How in the world can these IDIOT owners give a pitcher with an under .500 record all this money. 69-73 with an 3.35 era, in the NL too. It's not his fault, he's not stupid, like these owners are, he's going to take the money. I know, I know, tell me how GREAT he is. If he is so good, then why is his record under .500? They just won the World Series, can't blame the ole " pitched for a bad team" theory. They win the WS and he is just 13-11, WOW. Overrated pitcher if you ask me. You want a Stud pitcher, Josh Johnson. 48-23. 48 wins in 113 starts, Cain, 69 wins in 203 starts
quote
stevo1 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
stevo1
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 5807
Location:
#2
Posted: 4/2/2012 7:59:05 PM
quote
bermea12 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
bermea12
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 485
Location:
#3
Posted: 4/2/2012 8:00:16 PM
Come on give him a break, have u seen his run support, last year was under 2, is hard to win games like that
quote
dcmc34f send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Location: Georgia
#4
Posted: 4/2/2012 8:02:45 PM
Clayton Kershaw is 47-28. 47 wins in 113 starts, same as Johnson. Cain is OVERRATED.
quote
dcmc34f send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Location: Georgia
#5
Posted: 4/2/2012 8:04:30 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by bermea12:

Come on give him a break, have u seen his run support, last year was under 2, is hard to win games like that
What about Marlins and Dodgers? Johnson and Kershaw have ZERO run support and they win. Explain that to me?
quote
drum67 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Mirage |
drum67
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2310
Location: South Carolina
#6
Posted: 4/2/2012 8:44:00 PM
Giants don't score runs.
quote
Laroja
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sports Interaction |
Laroja
Participation Meter
All-Star
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10530
Location: Ontario
#7
Posted: 4/2/2012 8:49:35 PM
Bizarre contract.
quote
dcmc34f send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Location: Georgia
#8
Posted: 4/2/2012 9:09:19 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by drum67:

Giants don't score runs.
Last year, 2011, Giants avg 3.5 runs, LA 3.9, marlins 3.7. In 2010, Giants avg, 4.3 runs Dodgers 4.1 Marlins 4.4. In the last 2 years, the Giants have scored more runs than both LA and Marlins. What else do you got?
quote
Sparky10191 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Sparky10191
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 67601
Location: New York
#9
Posted: 4/2/2012 9:11:03 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Have the owners lost their mind? How in the world can these IDIOT owners give a pitcher with an under .500 record all this money. 69-73 with an
3.35 era, in the NL too. It's not his fault, he's not stupid, like these owners are, he's going to take the money. I know, I know, tell me how GREAT he is. If he is so good, then why is his record under .500? They just won the World Series, can't blame the ole " pitched for a bad team" theory. They win the WS and he is just 13-11, WOW. Overrated pitcher if you ask me. You want a Stud pitcher, Josh Johnson. 48-23. 48 wins in 113 starts, Cain, 69 wins in 203 starts

Sorry bud...but you lose your argument when you posted his ERA. That ERA is EXACTLY why he deserves to be a top paid pitcher. 
quote
dcmc34f send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Location: Georgia
#10
Posted: 4/2/2012 9:20:13 PM
Kershaw is at 2.88 and Johnson is 2.99. What do they deserve, 40 million a year?
quote
Sparky10191 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Sparky10191
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 67601
Location: New York
#11
Posted: 4/2/2012 9:22:24 PM
When the Giants score 3 or more runs in Cain's starts and he gets a decision...

2005: 1-0
2006: 12-7
2007: 6-3
2008: 6-6
2009: 13-4
2010: 13-2
2011: 10-1

In his career...he is 61-23. So not taking the lineup into consideration is far from fair. 
quote
The Hawk send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sports Interaction |
The Hawk
Participation Meter
All-Star
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14625
Location: California
#12
Posted: 4/2/2012 9:23:39 PM

They were the lowest scoring World Series winner ever...........

Take any two player from the teams you mentioned, and they will be better than any two players from last years Giants team.........

quote
Spartacus10 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
Spartacus10
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5628
Location: Ontario
#13
Posted: 4/2/2012 9:26:39 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Sparky10191:


Sorry bud...but you lose your argument when you posted his ERA. That ERA is EXACTLY why he deserves to be a top paid pitcher. 




Every single person in this thread (except Sparky) just represented how little knowledge of baseball they have. Wins certainly aren't how you should judge a pitchers performance. What about when Hernandez won the CY Young with a 13-12 record, but his ERA was just 2.27. What we can take from this is that wins are basically irrelevant, ERA is a much better statistic to judge a pitcher.

Is a pitcher with a 16-10 record with a 3.95 ERA better than a pitcher with a  8-10 record with a 2.47 ERA? The simple answer is no.
quote
Sparky10191 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Sparky10191
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 67601
Location: New York
#14
Posted: 4/2/2012 9:27:18 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Kershaw is at 2.88 and Johnson is 2.99. What do they deserve, 40 million a year?

In the world we live in...they deserve to be 2 of the top paid pitchers in the league. We're not arguing who is better...because JJ and Kershaw ARE better. But the way people are paid now...Cain is deserving.
quote
Spartacus10 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
Spartacus10
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5628
Location: Ontario
#15
Posted: 4/2/2012 9:28:11 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Kershaw is at 2.88 and Johnson is 2.99. What do they deserve, 40 million a year?


After 100 more starts each (which would put them closer to Cain) I can guarantee you see a regression.
quote
dcmc34f send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Location: Georgia
#16
Posted: 4/2/2012 9:59:44 PM
Sparky, is a pitcher who pitches in the National league that has a career era of 3.35 considered a great pitcher?
quote
dcmc34f send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Location: Georgia
#17
Posted: 4/2/2012 10:01:14 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Spartacus10:





Every single person in this thread (except Sparky) just represented how little knowledge of baseball they have. Wins certainly aren't how you should judge a pitchers performance. What about when Hernandez won the CY Young with a 13-12 record, but his ERA was just 2.27. What we can take from this is that wins are basically irrelevant, ERA is a much better statistic to judge a pitcher.

Is a pitcher with a 16-10 record with a 3.95 ERA better than a pitcher with a  8-10 record with a 2.47 ERA? The simple answer is no.
Cain does not have a 2.47 era and is NO WHERE NEAR IT.
quote
Sparky10191 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Sparky10191
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 67601
Location: New York
#18
Posted: 4/2/2012 10:12:07 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Sparky, is a pitcher who pitches in the National league that has a career era of 3.35 considered a great pitcher?


2.89
3.14
2.88

Last 3 years. Consistency. 
quote
Sparky10191 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Sparky10191
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 67601
Location: New York
#19
Posted: 4/2/2012 10:12:35 PM
And does it matter that he's doing his damage in the National League if he's going to continue to play in the National League?
quote
Spartacus10 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
Spartacus10
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5628
Location: Ontario
#20
Posted: 4/2/2012 10:37:04 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Sparky, is a pitcher who pitches in the National league that has a career era of 3.35 considered a great pitcher?


Kershaw and Johnson both pitch in the NL as well, and their ERA's aren't much better, plus they still have about 4 full seasons worth of starts to get where Cain is. I can almost guarantee that both of their numbers will regress as well as hitters get a better feel for them. Your argument is horrible, especially considering that Kershaw has started more games in pitcher friendly parks than Cain (both pitch quite a few games.) Personally, I feel Kershaw will regress and by the end will be a career 3.80 ERA kind of pitcher.
quote
boberts427
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
boberts427
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4933
Location: United States
#21
Posted: 4/2/2012 10:41:38 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Sparky10191:


2.89
3.14
2.88

Last 3 years. Consistency. 

 

also Johnson lives on the DL

Cains getting 17 wins this year, relaxed and paid, also dont forget he had to watch Zito make 18.5 a year lol

quote
dcmc34f send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Location: Georgia
#22
Posted: 4/2/2012 10:41:50 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Sparky10191:


2.89
3.14
2.88

Last 3 years. Consistency. 
Sparky, the question was, a pitcher, not Cain, take the name out of it. A pitcher with a career 3.35 in the NL a great pitcher? Now answer it.
quote
Sparky10191 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Sparky10191
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 67601
Location: New York
#23
Posted: 4/2/2012 10:47:24 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Sparky, the question was, a pitcher, not Cain, take the name out of it. A pitcher with a career 3.35 in the NL a great pitcher? Now answer it.


I think that's the story here. You take the name Cain and you don't think elite. But he's as consistent as it comes. 

He has a 2.97 ERA over 662 innings over the past 3 years with no signs of slowing down. And he's only 27 years old.
quote
dcmc34f send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Location: Georgia
#24
Posted: 4/2/2012 10:47:48 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by boberts427:

 

also Johnson lives on the DL

Cains getting 17 wins this year, relaxed and paid, also dont forget he had to watch Zito make 18.5 a year lol

Cain will have his normal year, 10 to 13 wins, era between 3.00 and 3.45. All I'm saying is, the owners don't spend their money wisely, and Cain is not worth it. Not with those numbers. Kershaw will win 18-20, era UNDER 3, WAY UNDER. I'll take that.
quote
Sparky10191 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Sparky10191
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 67601
Location: New York
#25
Posted: 4/2/2012 10:50:10 PM
3.00 - 3.45 is not a normal ERA? His normal ERA is between 2.88 and 3.14.

Not everyone comes into the league and is one of the best pitchers year in and year out. He's been hitting his strides for a few seasons now and is a top starter. Top 15 in my book.
quote
Forum Index : MLB Betting : Messages Page 1 of 3  1 2 3  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.