O's ML and -1.5- New manager's first game means an easy W. The fact they open this line as a fav and goes up with a team 41 under, well they just tipped their hand who's winning this game just by reading the line.
Fish ML- One of my fav pitchers to fade is on the road laying more than 2-1 again, what a joke. Only 13-9 when his team pitches and the most over valued pitcher in baseball. Like the fact West is making his first start of the year, he should pitch well and look for the Fish to shock some people. Tempted with -1.5, we'll see.
Tigers ML game 1- No way Sox should be favs here. There are nothing special on the road and this line is nothing but perception. They are winning all their games at home. I liked what I saw in Boston and I have to respect they are so dominate at home and should find a way to win vs a team 1 over .500 on the road.
Stros ML- Hot team with a pitcher who pitches his best vs this team for whatever reason. Not much to think about for me here and an insane amount of value. Might add first 5 as well.
SD ML- Hate the fact they are favs but there isn't one reason to take LAD and I'm not going to stop fading them until they win a game. Is there a worse offense in baseball right now? Probably will take the -1.5 instead for value reasons.
These are the games that jumped out to me and will be taking. May add Indians first 5, why not. Nothing else I really like, I'm sure the forum will give me a game to fade though. I do like the Yanks -1.5 but I don't take those kind of run lines.
O's ML and -1.5- New manager's first game means an easy W. The fact they open this line as a fav and goes up with a team 41 under, well they just tipped their hand who's winning this game just by reading the line.
Fish ML- One of my fav pitchers to fade is on the road laying more than 2-1 again, what a joke. Only 13-9 when his team pitches and the most over valued pitcher in baseball. Like the fact West is making his first start of the year, he should pitch well and look for the Fish to shock some people. Tempted with -1.5, we'll see.
Tigers ML game 1- No way Sox should be favs here. There are nothing special on the road and this line is nothing but perception. They are winning all their games at home. I liked what I saw in Boston and I have to respect they are so dominate at home and should find a way to win vs a team 1 over .500 on the road.
Stros ML- Hot team with a pitcher who pitches his best vs this team for whatever reason. Not much to think about for me here and an insane amount of value. Might add first 5 as well.
SD ML- Hate the fact they are favs but there isn't one reason to take LAD and I'm not going to stop fading them until they win a game. Is there a worse offense in baseball right now? Probably will take the -1.5 instead for value reasons.
These are the games that jumped out to me and will be taking. May add Indians first 5, why not. Nothing else I really like, I'm sure the forum will give me a game to fade though. I do like the Yanks -1.5 but I don't take those kind of run lines.
ok, i've already put a bit on the angels, but i agree, this line is fucked up, and i am in the midwest, and i saw all 4 games the O's played against the royals(and lost 3 of 4). so help me out, is this strictly a strange line play? or new manager play? or do you think baltimore will just play better than the angels?
because i plan on putting a fair share on the laa at ml plus money(that does sound fishy) but hopefully that's what the books are hoping we'll think
ok, i've already put a bit on the angels, but i agree, this line is fucked up, and i am in the midwest, and i saw all 4 games the O's played against the royals(and lost 3 of 4). so help me out, is this strictly a strange line play? or new manager play? or do you think baltimore will just play better than the angels?
because i plan on putting a fair share on the laa at ml plus money(that does sound fishy) but hopefully that's what the books are hoping we'll think
really liking the O's as well. guthrie has pitched well his last 2 games, treavor bell is still learning to throw in the MLB.
Who cares about the pitchers, Buck is making his debut. That is the only thing that matters. When a team plays their first game with a manager, it's an adrenaline rush or some high because they always seem to win. Don't get caught up in the pitching matchup, it means nothing.
really liking the O's as well. guthrie has pitched well his last 2 games, treavor bell is still learning to throw in the MLB.
Who cares about the pitchers, Buck is making his debut. That is the only thing that matters. When a team plays their first game with a manager, it's an adrenaline rush or some high because they always seem to win. Don't get caught up in the pitching matchup, it means nothing.
O's ML and -1.5- New manager's first game means an easy W. The fact they open this line as a fav and goes up with a team 41 under, well they just tipped their hand who's winning this game just by reading the line.
O's ML and -1.5- New manager's first game means an easy W. The fact they open this line as a fav and goes up with a team 41 under, well they just tipped their hand who's winning this game just by reading the line.
ok, i've already put a bit on the angels, but i agree, this line is fucked up, and i am in the midwest, and i saw all 4 games the O's played against the royals(and lost 3 of 4). so help me out, is this strictly a strange line play? or new manager play? or do you think baltimore will just play better than the angels?
because i plan on putting a fair share on the laa at ml plus money(that does sound fishy) but hopefully that's what the books are hoping we'll think
A team that is 41 games under and they are a fav and you want to bet against them? The oddsmakers are telling you who's going to win. How many times this year has the line moved up in an O's game? Uhhhh this is the first one. Halos are a pure sucker bet. Stop looking at the matchup page guys, there are no answers there for this game. Just look at the line .
ok, i've already put a bit on the angels, but i agree, this line is fucked up, and i am in the midwest, and i saw all 4 games the O's played against the royals(and lost 3 of 4). so help me out, is this strictly a strange line play? or new manager play? or do you think baltimore will just play better than the angels?
because i plan on putting a fair share on the laa at ml plus money(that does sound fishy) but hopefully that's what the books are hoping we'll think
A team that is 41 games under and they are a fav and you want to bet against them? The oddsmakers are telling you who's going to win. How many times this year has the line moved up in an O's game? Uhhhh this is the first one. Halos are a pure sucker bet. Stop looking at the matchup page guys, there are no answers there for this game. Just look at the line .
I'm on everything like you except the Astros, can't pull the trigger on that one. I have DET for Game 1 and 2 and the under in both games. Worst case is a push I think with some scoop potential.
I'm on everything like you except the Astros, can't pull the trigger on that one. I have DET for Game 1 and 2 and the under in both games. Worst case is a push I think with some scoop potential.
A team that is 41 games under and they are a fav and you want to bet against them? The oddsmakers are telling you who's going to win. How many times this year has the line moved up in an O's game? Uhhhh this is the first one. Halos are a pure sucker bet. Stop looking at the matchup page guys, there are no answers there for this game. Just look at the line .
So is this game fixed? Otherwise how do oddsmakers KNOW whos going to win. They dont know. O's may win but they dont know that
A team that is 41 games under and they are a fav and you want to bet against them? The oddsmakers are telling you who's going to win. How many times this year has the line moved up in an O's game? Uhhhh this is the first one. Halos are a pure sucker bet. Stop looking at the matchup page guys, there are no answers there for this game. Just look at the line .
So is this game fixed? Otherwise how do oddsmakers KNOW whos going to win. They dont know. O's may win but they dont know that
So is this game fixed? Otherwise how do oddsmakers KNOW whos going to win. They dont know. O's may win but they dont know that
Missed my point and I'm to literal at times. Of course they don't know because a million things can happen in a baseball game and the Halos can win. But if this game is played a 100 times with everything being equal, O's win this game 66% of the time IMO.
So is this game fixed? Otherwise how do oddsmakers KNOW whos going to win. They dont know. O's may win but they dont know that
Missed my point and I'm to literal at times. Of course they don't know because a million things can happen in a baseball game and the Halos can win. But if this game is played a 100 times with everything being equal, O's win this game 66% of the time IMO.
Surprised you went against your logic yesterday with Minny. That was the only play I questioned.
Card looks solid today. Rake em buddy.
Over thought it, was dumb. I took them because of how bad TB numbers were the next game after they play the Yanks and didn't want to get in front of Minny's win streak. Should of been a no play on my part.
Surprised you went against your logic yesterday with Minny. That was the only play I questioned.
Card looks solid today. Rake em buddy.
Over thought it, was dumb. I took them because of how bad TB numbers were the next game after they play the Yanks and didn't want to get in front of Minny's win streak. Should of been a no play on my part.
ok, i've already put a bit on the angels, but i agree, this line is fucked up, and i am in the midwest, and i saw all 4 games the O's played against the royals(and lost 3 of 4).
First off, you watched those Royals/Orioles games? Wow. You must be a fucking degenerate or you must fight off boredom at all costs.
Anyway, just because the O's lost to the Royals, does that mean they are going to lose to the Angels? What do those games have to do with this one?
Watching games and basing your perception off of that is going to make you a losing gambler.
ok, i've already put a bit on the angels, but i agree, this line is fucked up, and i am in the midwest, and i saw all 4 games the O's played against the royals(and lost 3 of 4).
First off, you watched those Royals/Orioles games? Wow. You must be a fucking degenerate or you must fight off boredom at all costs.
Anyway, just because the O's lost to the Royals, does that mean they are going to lose to the Angels? What do those games have to do with this one?
Watching games and basing your perception off of that is going to make you a losing gambler.
the white sox in the early game may be the squarest bet i've seen in a long, long time (excluding a few inflated lines on aces here and there). it seems as though vegas is welcoming white sox money with open arms.
the white sox in the early game may be the squarest bet i've seen in a long, long time (excluding a few inflated lines on aces here and there). it seems as though vegas is welcoming white sox money with open arms.
todays favorite tommorows tomato can, fickle group of vig addicts here on covers. since week 3 you've been your consistently solid spot picker. your style has no bad sports but i believe baseballs grind and "gamblers psychee" are especially kind to your philosophy.
todays favorite tommorows tomato can, fickle group of vig addicts here on covers. since week 3 you've been your consistently solid spot picker. your style has no bad sports but i believe baseballs grind and "gamblers psychee" are especially kind to your philosophy.
Who cares about the pitchers, Buck is making his debut. That is the only thing that matters. When a team plays their first game with a manager, it's an adrenaline rush or some high because they always seem to win. Don't get caught up in the pitching matchup, it means nothing.
I 2nd that, it's all about the hitting. If your not hitting the pitching is useless. The pitcher can only keep'm in it for so long. Buck will have those guys hitting tonite. Watch and C.....
Who cares about the pitchers, Buck is making his debut. That is the only thing that matters. When a team plays their first game with a manager, it's an adrenaline rush or some high because they always seem to win. Don't get caught up in the pitching matchup, it means nothing.
I 2nd that, it's all about the hitting. If your not hitting the pitching is useless. The pitcher can only keep'm in it for so long. Buck will have those guys hitting tonite. Watch and C.....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.