All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

. .

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2390
Posts: 46
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34973
Posted: #1
Monday:
200/256 Colorado Rockies -1½ +128
 
Tuesday:
300/546 Texas Rangers +182
200/292 Baltimore Orioles +146
132/100 Tampa Bay Rays -132
100/164 Detroit Tigers +164
 
Wednesday:
396/300 St. Louis Cardinals -132
222/200 Athletics/Mariners Under 8½ -111
 
Thursday:
 
330/200 Milwaukee Brewers -165
100/115, 200/206 Chicago White Sox +115, +103
113/100 Indians/Orioles Under 9½ -113
 
Friday:
 
112/100 Chicago Cubs -1½ -112
405/300 Milwaukee Brewers -135
200/282 San Diego Padres +141
111/100 Texas Rangers -111
 
Saturday:
 
200/210 White Sox/Yankees Over 11 +105
110/100 Chicago Cubs -1½ -110
300/300 Milwaukee Brewers -1½ +100
100/110 Philadelphia Phillies -1½ +110
218/200 Texas Rangers -109
210/200 San Francisco Giants -105
 
YTD +$3199
 
Sunday's card:
 
Sleeping on it.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34973
Posted: #2
Sunday, August 30th - Pitchers' #'s & Ratings:
 
COOL COLORS = good ratings/grades = lucky ephemerides
WARM COLORS = bad ratings/grades = unlucky ephemerides
 
+ = high or optimal physical bio
- = low or critical physical bio
 
Freddy García (0-1, 6.75) C- is 4-3 w/a 4.19 ERA in nine career starts against the Yankees.
Joba Chamberlain (8-4, 4.34) B+
 
Jeff Niemann (12-5, 3.87) C-
Justin Verlander (14-7, 3.38) B+ is 2-0 w/a 4.50 ERA in four career starts against the Rays.
 
Clayton Kershaw (8-7, 2.96) C-
Bronson Arroyo (11-12, 4.43) B+ is 1-4 w/a 4.91 ERA against the Dodgers.
 
Mat Latos (4-3, 4.06) B+
Sean West (5-5, 4.44) D-
Synopsis: Wow. Can the Padres really sweep the Marlins? West coming off 4-days rest but he was very effective against the Mets on August 25th. And Mat Latos was equally impressive in his last start.
 
Justin Masterson (4-5, 4.47) C+
Brian Matusz (2-2, 6.46) B+
 
Roy Halladay (13-7, 3.03) B- is 13-13 w/approx a 4.39 ERA in thirty-six career starts against the Red Sox.
Paul Byrd (0-0, 0.00) B+ is 5-5 w/a 3.86 ERA in eleven career starts against the Blue Jays.
 
Ross Ohlendorf (11-8, 4.10) C- is 2-0 w/a 2.25 ERA in two starts against the Brewers.
Jeff Suppan (5-8, 5.38) B+ is 13-3 w/a 4.45 ERA in twenty-three career starts against the Pirates.
 
Kevin Millwood (10-8, 3.63) C- is 0-7 w/a 6.18 ERA in eleven career starts against the Twins.
Scott Baker (12-7, 4.47) C- is 2-2 w/a 5.59 ERA in five career starts against the Rangers.
 
Garrett Mock (3-5, 5.23) C+
Adam Wainwright (15-7, 2.50) C-
 
Nelson Figueroa (1-3, 5.40) B+ sucks against the Cubs and thats all you need to know.
Carlos Zambrano (7-5, 3.80) C- is 4-1 w/approx a 3.67 ERA in seven career starts against the Mets.
 
Brett Anderson (7-9, 4.35) C- is 0-1 w/a 3.55 ERA in two starts against the Angels.
John Lackey (8-7, 4.16) B-/C- is 15-4 w/a 2.66 ERA in twenty-seven career starts against the Athletics.
 
Jason Hammel (8-7, 4.43) C- is 0-1 w/a 2.25 ERA in two starts against the Giants.
Matt Cain (12-4, 2.39) C- is 8-5 w/a 2.98 ERA in sixteen career starts against the Rockies.
 
Wandy Rodríguez (12-8, 2.82) B+ is 2-3 w/a 5.55 ERA in five starts against the Diamondbacks.
Dan Haren (12-8, 2.73) C- is 2-2 w/a 3.18 ERA in four starts against the Astros.
 
Zack Greinke (12-8, 2.43) B- is 2-0 w/approx a 2.65 ERA in five starts against the Mariners.
Ryan Rowland-Smith (2-1, 4.05) B+ has a 4.91 ERA against the Royals.
 
Jair Jurrjens (10-8, 2.91) C- is 3-2 w/a 2.31 ERA in seven career starts against the Phillies.
Joe Blanton (8-6, 3.88) C+ is 0-1 w/a 6.58 ERA in five career starts against the Braves.
 
Pitchers i'm avoiding/fading on Sunday:
 
Jeff Niemann
Sean West
Ross Ohlendorf
Matt Cain
Jair Jurrjens
 
Possible values/winners for Sunday:
 
Detroit Tigers -146
San Diego Padres +140
Blue Jays/Red Sox Under
Milwaukee Brewers -127
Pirates/Brewers Over 9.5 +100
Colorado Rockies +131
Philadelphia Phillies -127
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 309
Posted: #3

you have wainwright as a C-

probably the hottest and most in-form pitcher right now, and you give him a C-. 15-7 w/ 2.5 ERA and those stats are skewed as he started off slow. hes been the hottest pitcher since the AS break.

2-0, 0.82 ERA L3...and 1.87 ERA at home. and you give him a C-

So by your ratings... garret mock, PAUL BYRD (who you have as a B+, yet his 40-year old ass HAS NOT STARTED A GAME THIS YEAR even with the sox rotation injuries), and ryan rowland smith, are way better then wainwright

can you explain this?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34973
Posted: #4
Once upon a time, Kyle Orton outplayed Peyton Manning.
 
And Tom Brady is human.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 300
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by Just_KiDDing:

you have wainwright as a C-

probably the hottest and most in-form pitcher right now, and you give him a C-. 15-7 w/ 2.5 ERA and those stats are skewed as he started off slow. hes been the hottest pitcher since the AS break.

2-0, 0.82 ERA L3...and 1.87 ERA at home. and you give him a C-

So by your ratings... garret mock, PAUL BYRD (who you have as a B+, yet his 40-year old ass HAS NOT STARTED A GAME THIS YEAR even with the sox rotation injuries), and ryan rowland smith, are way better then wainwright

can you explain this?

There is no plausible explanation for that.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37503
Posted: #6
Kane you pushed on the PHI RL it is not a
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 14503
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:

Once upon a time, Kyle Orton outplayed Peyton Manning.
 
And Tom Brady is human.

That is some words of wisdom right there.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 309
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:

Once upon a time, Kyle Orton outplayed Peyton Manning.
 
And Tom Brady is human.

Exactly what I expected, that you wouldnt able to defend or give reasoning for what you post.
 
 Some whackjob type conspiracy theory that makes no sense. You really are clueless, and the majority of your posts have no basis or reasoning.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37503
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Just_KiDDing:

Exactly what I expected, that you wouldnt able to defend or give reasoning for what you post.
 
 Some whackjob type conspiracy theory that makes no sense. You really are clueless, and the majority of your posts have no basis or reasoning.

If you have a problem about it get out of the thread.  BOL Kane!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1643
Posted: #10
Kane's record speaks for itself.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 3939
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by Just_KiDDing:

you have wainwright as a C-

probably the hottest and most in-form pitcher right now, and you give him a C-. 15-7 w/ 2.5 ERA and those stats are skewed as he started off slow. hes been the hottest pitcher since the AS break.

2-0, 0.82 ERA L3...and 1.87 ERA at home. and you give him a C-

So by your ratings... garret mock, PAUL BYRD (who you have as a B+, yet his 40-year old ass HAS NOT STARTED A GAME THIS YEAR even with the sox rotation injuries), and ryan rowland smith, are way better then wainwright

can you explain this?


Yet you're here late at night checking his thread.

You know you'll still be tailing his picks.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 24217
Posted: #12
hey kane..wanted to thank you for brew crew the other night..keep up the good work
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 502
Posted: #13
kane don't sleep on it, keep the mojo flowing 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 309
Posted: #14

You know you'll still be tailing his picks.
 
I dont tail. I look for arguments/reasoning on games, and things that I may have missed. Didnt find it here, done.
 
GL kane.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34973
Posted: #15
Just_KiDDing - I'm a very subtle person.
 
If you don't understand that on certain days Peyton Manning and Tom Brady can be beaten then... thats fine.
 
My ratings are only 50% correct. That makes me just about a 50% handicapper, which is fine by me.
 
One day, these ratings will be 100% correct and i'll become a 100% handicapper.
 
Yeah.
 
Why don't you try and guess how all 30 pitchers will perform on Sunday and see how you'd fare trying to predict the future?
 
Fly at it.
 
jesron1269 - Got it. That was one game i didn't watch after the 5th inning, mainly because it was a loser and i was way off on my call on Lowe and Lee. I haven't logged in to take any overnight lines yet; going to wait to see how these lines move in 10 hours.
 
C'yall in the morning.
 
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 8023
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by Just_KiDDing:

Exactly what I expected, that you wouldnt able to defend or give reasoning for what you post.
 
 Some whackjob type conspiracy theory that makes no sense. You really are clueless, and the majority of your posts have no basis or reasoning.
   HEY MIKE DONT QUESTION THE MOJO GURU BTW HAVE U CHECKED YOURS LATELY I SEE U LOSING A PARLAY WITH A BASES LOADED BALK IN THE BOTTOM OF NINTH INNING SOON WATCH YOURSELF .......BOL KANE
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34973
Posted: #17
Feelin' really confident about the Orioles & the Tigers today!
 
Sunday's card:
 
505/500 Baltimore Orioles -101
447/300 Detroit Tigers -149
100/128 San Diego Padres +128
242/200 Milwaukee Brewers -121
 
Sunday night:
 
TBA
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 696
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by Just_KiDDing:

you have wainwright as a C-

probably the hottest and most in-form pitcher right now, and you give him a C-. 15-7 w/ 2.5 ERA and those stats are skewed as he started off slow. hes been the hottest pitcher since the AS break.

2-0, 0.82 ERA L3...and 1.87 ERA at home. and you give him a C-

So by your ratings... garret mock, PAUL BYRD (who you have as a B+, yet his 40-year old ass HAS NOT STARTED A GAME THIS YEAR even with the sox rotation injuries), and ryan rowland smith, are way better then wainwright

can you explain this?



Grades are based on Biorythms.

  Biorhythms illustrate the principle that we are influenced by physical, emotional, and intellectual cycles. Many people report that they can improve the quality of their lives by monitoring the highs and lows of these cycles and acting accordingly. For example, you might try to schedule important exams during your intellectual highs, avoid talking to your significant other during your emotional lows, or arranging the lineup of your baseball team around their physical highs.
It has nothing to do with a players skill level, or how they have been playing lately
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34973
Posted: #19
Oh yeah. I could've told him to Google: biorhythms & ephemerides.
 
And he'd be even more lost. Hehe.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6703
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by Just_KiDDing:

Exactly what I expected, that you wouldnt able to defend or give reasoning for what you post.
 
 Some whackjob type conspiracy theory that makes no sense. You really are clueless, and the majority of your posts have no basis or reasoning.

 

Kane's method is not what you called "conventional" and he never claimed it to be. So why the attack??

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 16804
Posted: #21
Good Luck HK   
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 5386
Posted: #22
Was looking at a big play on LA Dodgers....they usually beat up on Bronson and his day #'s are not good. But your work up doesn't line up for Dodgers, any reason you didn't play Reds?
 
Clayton Kershaw (8-7, 2.96) C-
Bronson Arroyo (11-12, 4.43) B+ is 1-4 w/a 4.91 ERA against the Dodgers.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 13450
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:

Oh yeah. I could've told him to Google: biorhythms & ephemerides.
 
And he'd be even more lost. Hehe.

 

You did help him out by spelling it for him. 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34973
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by DaRaiders:

Was looking at a big play on LA Dodgers....they usually beat up on Bronson and his day #'s are not good. But your work up doesn't line up for Dodgers, any reason you didn't play Reds?
 
Clayton Kershaw (8-7, 2.96) C-
Bronson Arroyo (11-12, 4.43) B+ is 1-4 w/a 4.91 ERA against the Dodgers.

This is one matchup i don't have a good read on. I rarely get a good read on Kershaw.

Plus, Bronson Arroyo's is one of those pithcers whose performances do not usually coincide with his bio & astro readings.

When Arroyo is pitching its either fade him or pass. Since it seems to be his "lucky' day, i pass.

 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 20320
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:

Feelin' really confident about the Orioles & the Tigers today!
 
Sunday's card:
 
505/500 Baltimore Orioles -101
447/300 Detroit Tigers -149
100/128 San Diego Padres +128
242/200 Milwaukee Brewers -121
 
Sunday night:
 
TBA
 

San Diego and Milwaukee are winners

All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.