Don't usually make hockey plays-- but as a Chicago resident who watches every Blackhawk game---this feels like a $3,000 ML bet....any of my much more qualified hockey experts have opinions?
Hawks going down to 2-2 just seems impossible. Thanks in advance fellas.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Don't usually make hockey plays-- but as a Chicago resident who watches every Blackhawk game---this feels like a $3,000 ML bet....any of my much more qualified hockey experts have opinions?
Hawks going down to 2-2 just seems impossible. Thanks in advance fellas.
Thanks for all of this advice. As someone who has watched every Blackhawks game this seems like a perfect spot for the Blackhawks. The entire public is all over Minny driving the ML down. Hawks looked putrid last game and still almost won. They absolutely dominated game 2. Still pondering my bet....
0
Thanks for all of this advice. As someone who has watched every Blackhawks game this seems like a perfect spot for the Blackhawks. The entire public is all over Minny driving the ML down. Hawks looked putrid last game and still almost won. They absolutely dominated game 2. Still pondering my bet....
Thanks for all of this advice. As someone who has watched every Blackhawks game this seems like a perfect spot for the Blackhawks. The entire public is all over Minny driving the ML down. Hawks looked putrid last game and still almost won. They absolutely dominated game 2. Still pondering my bet....
The public is all over Chicago. ~85%
Books don't care about their money.
Just another coin flip in the NHL
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bryn2396:
Thanks for all of this advice. As someone who has watched every Blackhawks game this seems like a perfect spot for the Blackhawks. The entire public is all over Minny driving the ML down. Hawks looked putrid last game and still almost won. They absolutely dominated game 2. Still pondering my bet....
Love these kind of threads. What I have noticed is that between these two teams there have been an abnormally high number of shots, with the winning team unsurprisingly taking more shots:
Game 1: 64
Game 2: 76
Game 3: 64
Remarkably, Minnesota games have averaged 57 shots while the Blackhawks games' have averaged 58 shots.
What does this mean? There is a much greater dependency on the respective goalies.
Statistics aside, the play between both sides has been relatively even, so I think it fair to suggest a bet on either team should be based upon which goalie you are more comfortable with.
Save percentages between goalies are 0.02 in difference, Crawford has been better on the road than at home this year, but Harding has been on fire himself. Nonetheless, I give a slight edge to Crawford.
This will be one of the best games of the first round in my opinion; the Wild know they need this game and the Blackhawks are coming off a loss and know a 3-1 lead essentially seals the deal. Chicago ought to be favourites but not more than -140 in my opinion.
Play: Wild (+150) ?
0
Love these kind of threads. What I have noticed is that between these two teams there have been an abnormally high number of shots, with the winning team unsurprisingly taking more shots:
Game 1: 64
Game 2: 76
Game 3: 64
Remarkably, Minnesota games have averaged 57 shots while the Blackhawks games' have averaged 58 shots.
What does this mean? There is a much greater dependency on the respective goalies.
Statistics aside, the play between both sides has been relatively even, so I think it fair to suggest a bet on either team should be based upon which goalie you are more comfortable with.
Save percentages between goalies are 0.02 in difference, Crawford has been better on the road than at home this year, but Harding has been on fire himself. Nonetheless, I give a slight edge to Crawford.
This will be one of the best games of the first round in my opinion; the Wild know they need this game and the Blackhawks are coming off a loss and know a 3-1 lead essentially seals the deal. Chicago ought to be favourites but not more than -140 in my opinion.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
