| Author: |
[Pro Hockey] Topic: 11-6-09 Friday puckering around |
|
Lippsman |
RSI   View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes.com |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 55392
Location: Zimbabwe |
#1 Posted: 11/6/2009 6:04:15 PM 4-2 yesterday, that's two of those in a row.
First of all I want to say, why in the hell would anyone put a wager on the Leafs/Canes game ??? Ok, that's all
Buffalo 1st period -120
Florida ov 2.5 -133
Dallas -.5 +105
Avs un 5.5 -125
Liked the Devils tonight, but don't like Danis. Philly has been off for 3 days, so I'm looking at Buffalo having a better shot at winning the 1st period than the whole game. My usual Dallas in regulation line, if the Stars can't win in regulation, then you have almost no chance of them winning in OT. The Hawks and Avs are just under machines as of late.
So you know what that means. 
GL
|
|
quote |
|
MainlyProps |
RSI  |
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 533
Location: Ontario |
#2 Posted: 11/6/2009 6:05:11 PM
|
|
quote |
|
LuckyGuy |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8398
Location: Canada |
#3 Posted: 11/6/2009 6:08:25 PM 
I'm taking a hungrier Toronto team that at least TRIES to win 
|
|
quote |
|
Lippsman |
RSI |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 55392
Location: Zimbabwe |
#4 Posted: 11/6/2009 6:55:32 PM Bonus NBA plays
Charlotte un 180
Philly ov 193.5
GS ov 216
Lakers ov 210
GL
|
|
quote |
|
4seasons |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5521
Location: Massachusetts |
#5 Posted: 11/6/2009 8:52:55 PM Fading Dallas against Van. After the Bruins tied up Monty late in the 3rd on a weak intentional offsides Linesman call against the Habs, to get their first goal after 100 shots over 3 games, they then fell in OT on some pathetic shoot-out attempts. Nothing like failing to get the puck on net on a shootout attempt. Have to say I was surprised to learn that the Habs are now 7-0 in OT. I see you mentioned that Dallas is weak in OT, with 6 OTL's vs. Van's 0 OTL's. So I will feel good if the game goes into OT, for whatever that's worth.
I'm a bit perplexed on your -.5 bet/odds. If games do not end in ties anymore, what's the point of a minus half-a-goal? If the money line is -155, and the -.5 is +105, it seems smart to take the -.5. Why then does the Book offer that line, as I don't see how the -.5 can lose, while the money line wins?  |
|
quote |
|
Kazual12 |
RSI |
Rookie
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 993
Location: Connecticut |
#6 Posted: 11/6/2009 8:59:18 PM  |
|
quote |
|
Lippsman |
RSI |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 55392
Location: Zimbabwe |
#7 Posted: 11/6/2009 9:00:45 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by 4seasons:
I'm a bit perplexed on your -.5 bet/odds. If games do not end in ties anymore, what's the point of a minus half-a-goal? If the money line is -155, and the -.5 is +105, it seems smart to take the -.5. Why then does the Book offer that line, as I don't see how the -.5 can lose, while the money line wins?
Becuase -.5 lines are for regulation only
|
|
quote |
|
4seasons |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5521
Location: Massachusetts |
#8 Posted: 11/6/2009 9:17:09 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Lippsman:
Becuase -.5 lines are for regulation only
Ahhhhhh, I see, very nice, thank you.
Dal laid some serious rubber on Schneider in the first, 22-10 shots  |
|
quote |
|
4seasons |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5521
Location: Massachusetts |
#9 Posted: 11/6/2009 10:37:11 PM Dal totally dominating, even if the refs gave 'em that one to make it 2-1  |
|
quote |
|
4seasons |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5521
Location: Massachusetts |
#10 Posted: 11/6/2009 10:39:44 PM It's officially a game now, with 11 mins. left,
Dal 2-1 ...  |
|
quote |
|
4seasons |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5521
Location: Massachusetts |
#11 Posted: 11/6/2009 10:42:06 PM  , I feel a Dal penalty before this is over  |
|
quote |
|
4seasons |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5521
Location: Massachusetts |
#12 Posted: 11/6/2009 10:45:24 PM  |
|
quote |
|
4seasons |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5521
Location: Massachusetts |
#13 Posted: 11/6/2009 10:46:31 PM  |
|
quote |
|
4seasons |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5521
Location: Massachusetts |
#14 Posted: 11/6/2009 10:49:18 PM 18 sec 2-man advantage 
We got a game in big D. |
|
quote |
|
4seasons |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5521
Location: Massachusetts |
#15 Posted: 11/6/2009 11:01:01 PM Nice job  |
|
quote |
|
Lippsman |
RSI |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 55392
Location: Zimbabwe |
#16 Posted: 11/6/2009 11:08:50 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by 4seasons:
Nice job
Thanks
It was the only nice job I had tonight.  |
|
quote |
|
westcoastexpres |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sports Interaction |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 59
Location: British
Columbia |
#17 Posted: 11/6/2009 11:46:26 PM
Because Canes were missing some of their top scorers, hadn't won in 10 games. Leafs had lost in OT or SO in their last 5...a couple against respectable teams and was very hungry for a win. This was my game of the night, cashed in. Saying that, I vow right now that I will not bet on the Maple Laughs to win anymore this year.
GL in the future mate! |
|
quote |
|
Jason316 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2572
Location: |
#18 Posted: 11/7/2009 6:23:38 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by westcoastexpres: "First of all I want to say, why in the hell would anyone put a wager on the Leafs/Canes game ???"
Because Canes were missing some of their top scorers, hadn't won in 10 games. Leafs had lost in OT or SO in their last 5...a couple against respectable teams and was very hungry for a win. This was my game of the night, cashed in. Saying that, I vow right now that I will not bet on the Maple Laughs to win anymore this year.
GL in the future mate!
|
|
quote |