line matchups having home ice should suit the ducks. would love to see the wings advance as they are perceived to be the best team in the nhl, but the ducks have won the cup with possibly a better roster today than b4.
if u cap from last game this should be all chicago. i think the books should have opened this line at -170 based on that perception. with injuries to the nucks i can't see the light thru the forrest either. i think we see a rough and dirty game and would not be surprised to see some more injuries after this war tonight. a war would suit these bad boy canucks more. i'll take the rougher team gimme van again
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
ducks +117 van + 135
line matchups having home ice should suit the ducks. would love to see the wings advance as they are perceived to be the best team in the nhl, but the ducks have won the cup with possibly a better roster today than b4.
if u cap from last game this should be all chicago. i think the books should have opened this line at -170 based on that perception. with injuries to the nucks i can't see the light thru the forrest either. i think we see a rough and dirty game and would not be surprised to see some more injuries after this war tonight. a war would suit these bad boy canucks more. i'll take the rougher team gimme van again
ur insane. I do nto care that they split in van couver there is no way in heck chicago be -170 vs a good nucks team. Maybe if this was tampa bay lightning perhaps:)
gl thou
0
lol
did u seriosuly say chicago -170 vs nucks?? LOL
ur insane. I do nto care that they split in van couver there is no way in heck chicago be -170 vs a good nucks team. Maybe if this was tampa bay lightning perhaps:)
ur insane. I do nto care that they split in van couver there is no way in heck chicago be -170 vs a good nucks team. Maybe if this was tampa bay lightning perhaps:)
gl thou
lines are based on perception and where the books can take a side rather than vig. the betting public has been on chi on every game hence they should have set this at -170 the fact it is this 'low' to me gives canucks a chance
0
Quote Originally Posted by msu09:
lol
did u seriosuly say chicago -170 vs nucks?? LOL
ur insane. I do nto care that they split in van couver there is no way in heck chicago be -170 vs a good nucks team. Maybe if this was tampa bay lightning perhaps:)
gl thou
lines are based on perception and where the books can take a side rather than vig. the betting public has been on chi on every game hence they should have set this at -170 the fact it is this 'low' to me gives canucks a chance
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.