These two teams either hate playing defense or they just don't care to play it. At one point the Cavs were shooting 70 % & the Pacers 55 % , that's unheard of in playoff basketball . Cavs shot a tad bit over 51 % from the charity stripe , that won't happen tonight . LBJ, Irving , and PG13 can't be stopped, it will be even a higher scoring game tonight then the first game . Both teams give up a high percentage on 3 point shots , two point shot, and paint points. These two teams are where they are because of their offensive capabilities . C.J Miles missed the game winning shot on Saturday , I guarantee you , he got no sleep that night because , he is a pure shooter . If the game wasn't on the line , he would've hit that shot. He will score tonight. The Pacers are kicking themselves for not taking that first game so it's a guarantee that they'll come out looser tonight and play even better on offense . The Cavs on the other hand no they got away with one, and will come firing on all cylinders. This pick is really a no brainer. Both teams haven't played any kind of good defense all year so it won't start tonight. I've see both teams all year long and I believe we see this hitting by middle of the 4th q. Vegas must see something that I don't see, but I doubt it. I hit Vegas up for 5200 last week because, some of there lines are flawed , quite often. On this one for a G to start the new week. Good luck .
These two teams either hate playing defense or they just don't care to play it. At one point the Cavs were shooting 70 % & the Pacers 55 % , that's unheard of in playoff basketball . Cavs shot a tad bit over 51 % from the charity stripe , that won't happen tonight . LBJ, Irving , and PG13 can't be stopped, it will be even a higher scoring game tonight then the first game . Both teams give up a high percentage on 3 point shots , two point shot, and paint points. These two teams are where they are because of their offensive capabilities . C.J Miles missed the game winning shot on Saturday , I guarantee you , he got no sleep that night because , he is a pure shooter . If the game wasn't on the line , he would've hit that shot. He will score tonight. The Pacers are kicking themselves for not taking that first game so it's a guarantee that they'll come out looser tonight and play even better on offense . The Cavs on the other hand no they got away with one, and will come firing on all cylinders. This pick is really a no brainer. Both teams haven't played any kind of good defense all year so it won't start tonight. I've see both teams all year long and I believe we see this hitting by middle of the 4th q. Vegas must see something that I don't see, but I doubt it. I hit Vegas up for 5200 last week because, some of there lines are flawed , quite often. On this one for a G to start the new week. Good luck .
All I need is 52 a q between these two teams that shoot extremely well and hate playing defense to get to 208 , which is highly expected to get a push but, I'm seeing a couple q's in the 60's. Any play I call has a very high probability of getting there or I'm just wasting money and time .
All I need is 52 a q between these two teams that shoot extremely well and hate playing defense to get to 208 , which is highly expected to get a push but, I'm seeing a couple q's in the 60's. Any play I call has a very high probability of getting there or I'm just wasting money and time .
Most players were below their regular score. Irving made just one of the nine attempts on the three-point line. Cleveland scored just 52% of free throws.
The bet on the over points, is actually very good.
Most players were below their regular score. Irving made just one of the nine attempts on the three-point line. Cleveland scored just 52% of free throws.
The bet on the over points, is actually very good.
Shawn I'm looking at the side as well . Haven't capped it yet but, I am going to do so in a little while. Just watching the line first to see a few things .
Shawn I'm looking at the side as well . Haven't capped it yet but, I am going to do so in a little while. Just watching the line first to see a few things .
then why does Vegas set the line 9 points lower than the total ended up last game?
my opinion or guess is they have to account for the zig-zag bettors as well. if the total is set 9 pts higher than game 1, then you'll get more Under money. i think the books usually keep the same lines in game 2 as in game 1 with a slight point difference from what i remember last year. only big changes to the line is if there is a key injury so you can see why the Clippers are 8 now, cuz Gobert is out and the fact that they lost in game 1, everyone is going to be on the Clippers..
then why does Vegas set the line 9 points lower than the total ended up last game?
my opinion or guess is they have to account for the zig-zag bettors as well. if the total is set 9 pts higher than game 1, then you'll get more Under money. i think the books usually keep the same lines in game 2 as in game 1 with a slight point difference from what i remember last year. only big changes to the line is if there is a key injury so you can see why the Clippers are 8 now, cuz Gobert is out and the fact that they lost in game 1, everyone is going to be on the Clippers..
Good point DK. See the thing that Vegas specializes is in fooling & tricking people . Most people out here are novice betters and the ones that's been around the block either are done with this because they can't win or they've found a way to become profitable . I consider myself the latter of the two. I've taking my lumps early on but now, I have figured some things out. You have to know what you're doing and have discipline and patience at the same time with great money management skills. There's a flawed line or two in every sport each day , we just have to know which way to look. You're good DK , we should've hit your Hawks play yesterday, they had the cover. Too many TO's to get it. The over hit so we broke even .
Good point DK. See the thing that Vegas specializes is in fooling & tricking people . Most people out here are novice betters and the ones that's been around the block either are done with this because they can't win or they've found a way to become profitable . I consider myself the latter of the two. I've taking my lumps early on but now, I have figured some things out. You have to know what you're doing and have discipline and patience at the same time with great money management skills. There's a flawed line or two in every sport each day , we just have to know which way to look. You're good DK , we should've hit your Hawks play yesterday, they had the cover. Too many TO's to get it. The over hit so we broke even .
What bout the reverse line movement it opened at 212 and is down to 208 and most bets are on the over. I am not a pro but I thought I saw you the other day talk bout reverse line movement any thoughts thanks. Bc I was leaning under and than saw you on the over.
What bout the reverse line movement it opened at 212 and is down to 208 and most bets are on the over. I am not a pro but I thought I saw you the other day talk bout reverse line movement any thoughts thanks. Bc I was leaning under and than saw you on the over.
Another trick by Vegas cp25. They know this game goes over. They want under money . This thing flies over in my opinion after researching . Looks like Pacers and cover again too but, I'm waiting on the side til 630 EST before I decide on the Pacers or not . If these teams played there best defense of the year , it still goes over. Too much offense here.
Another trick by Vegas cp25. They know this game goes over. They want under money . This thing flies over in my opinion after researching . Looks like Pacers and cover again too but, I'm waiting on the side til 630 EST before I decide on the Pacers or not . If these teams played there best defense of the year , it still goes over. Too much offense here.
What bout the reverse line movement it opened at 212 and is down to 208 and most bets are on the over. I am not a pro but I thought I saw you the other day talk bout reverse line movement any thoughts thanks. Bc I was leaning under and than saw you on the over.
What bout the reverse line movement it opened at 212 and is down to 208 and most bets are on the over. I am not a pro but I thought I saw you the other day talk bout reverse line movement any thoughts thanks. Bc I was leaning under and than saw you on the over.
my opinion or guess is they have to account for the zig-zag bettors as well. if the total is set 9 pts higher than game 1, then you'll get more Under money. i think the books usually keep the same lines in game 2 as in game 1 with a slight point difference from what i remember last year. only big changes to the line is if there is a key injury so you can see why the Clippers are 8 now, cuz Gobert is out and the fact that they lost in game 1, everyone is going to be on the Clippers..
The zig-zag applies to sides. It doesn't apply to totals.
my opinion or guess is they have to account for the zig-zag bettors as well. if the total is set 9 pts higher than game 1, then you'll get more Under money. i think the books usually keep the same lines in game 2 as in game 1 with a slight point difference from what i remember last year. only big changes to the line is if there is a key injury so you can see why the Clippers are 8 now, cuz Gobert is out and the fact that they lost in game 1, everyone is going to be on the Clippers..
The zig-zag applies to sides. It doesn't apply to totals.
The RLM on the total is because of contrarian thinking . Vegas have some of the smartest people in the world collecting pay checks but, are they the only smart people in the world ? Sometimes you just have to read in between these lines. The Cavs are coming out on fire tonight on offense the Pacers know they must keep up and they will.
The RLM on the total is because of contrarian thinking . Vegas have some of the smartest people in the world collecting pay checks but, are they the only smart people in the world ? Sometimes you just have to read in between these lines. The Cavs are coming out on fire tonight on offense the Pacers know they must keep up and they will.
They run computer simulations of the game played, thousands of times and find an average score. Along with expert consensus. Both teams were hot that game. Likely not to happen again as you would think that both teams know what to look out for. 4 less field and you have your under. Pretty tight for it not to change that much. Looks like it can go either way. Remember their strategy is to get equal money on both sides. So based on first game money seems they're playing it safe.
They run computer simulations of the game played, thousands of times and find an average score. Along with expert consensus. Both teams were hot that game. Likely not to happen again as you would think that both teams know what to look out for. 4 less field and you have your under. Pretty tight for it not to change that much. Looks like it can go either way. Remember their strategy is to get equal money on both sides. So based on first game money seems they're playing it safe.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.