Why do people ask questions that have obvious answers? Yet as easy as this is to compute, we still have one poster say +900? He obviously has no clue on how to compute statistical probabilities.
Kosmos, your answer was the correct one even though you did not do the math all the way through to get to the exact line of +110 (based on your estimated odds which will end up being pretty close). While I do think that GS should not be such a massive favorite game by game, Vegas is telling you what they think. I would expect, in the event of a Memphis game 4 victory, that the GS odds would drop ever so slightly. In effect, this might push the series price to +150 max.
Why do people ask questions that have obvious answers? Yet as easy as this is to compute, we still have one poster say +900? He obviously has no clue on how to compute statistical probabilities.
Kosmos, your answer was the correct one even though you did not do the math all the way through to get to the exact line of +110 (based on your estimated odds which will end up being pretty close). While I do think that GS should not be such a massive favorite game by game, Vegas is telling you what they think. I would expect, in the event of a Memphis game 4 victory, that the GS odds would drop ever so slightly. In effect, this might push the series price to +150 max.
Why do people ask questions that have obvious answers? Yet as easy as this is to compute, we still have one poster say +900? He obviously has no clue on how to compute statistical probabilities.
Kosmos, your answer was the correct one even though you did not do the math all the way through to get to the exact line of +110 (based on your estimated odds which will end up being pretty close). While I do think that GS should not be such a massive favorite game by game, Vegas is telling you what they think. I would expect, in the event of a Memphis game 4 victory, that the GS odds would drop ever so slightly. In effect, this might push the series price to +150 max.
Why do people ask questions that have obvious answers? Yet as easy as this is to compute, we still have one poster say +900? He obviously has no clue on how to compute statistical probabilities.
Kosmos, your answer was the correct one even though you did not do the math all the way through to get to the exact line of +110 (based on your estimated odds which will end up being pretty close). While I do think that GS should not be such a massive favorite game by game, Vegas is telling you what they think. I would expect, in the event of a Memphis game 4 victory, that the GS odds would drop ever so slightly. In effect, this might push the series price to +150 max.
Why do people ask questions that have obvious answers? Yet as easy as this is to compute, we still have one poster say +900? He obviously has no clue on how to compute statistical probabilities.
Kosmos, your answer was the correct one even though you did not do the math all the way through to get to the exact line of +110 (based on your estimated odds which will end up being pretty close). While I do think that GS should not be such a massive favorite game by game, Vegas is telling you what they think. I would expect, in the event of a Memphis game 4 victory, that the GS odds would drop ever so slightly. In effect, this might push the series price to +150 max.
Why do people ask questions that have obvious answers? Yet as easy as this is to compute, we still have one poster say +900? He obviously has no clue on how to compute statistical probabilities.
Kosmos, your answer was the correct one even though you did not do the math all the way through to get to the exact line of +110 (based on your estimated odds which will end up being pretty close). While I do think that GS should not be such a massive favorite game by game, Vegas is telling you what they think. I would expect, in the event of a Memphis game 4 victory, that the GS odds would drop ever so slightly. In effect, this might push the series price to +150 max.
Agreed!
But how great would it be it be able to gamble in a theoretical world where Vegas was run by risktaker? We could all bet GS +900 and then bet Memphis on the spread and ML every game. We wouldn't need real jobs until Vegas went bankrupt!
Agreed!
But how great would it be it be able to gamble in a theoretical world where Vegas was run by risktaker? We could all bet GS +900 and then bet Memphis on the spread and ML every game. We wouldn't need real jobs until Vegas went bankrupt!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.