Heat only play good after a loss look at last series win loss win loss win loss this series same thing they lost game 1 and then killed game 2 now they'll lose tonight and win game 4 watch
0
Heat only play good after a loss look at last series win loss win loss win loss this series same thing they lost game 1 and then killed game 2 now they'll lose tonight and win game 4 watch
Heat only play good after a loss look at last series win loss win loss win loss this series same thing they lost game 1 and then killed game 2 now they'll lose tonight and win game 4 watch
Good point but that was agaisnt their NEMESIS: the Indiana Pacers, who took 2 of 3 games in the regular season against the Heat ...
Miami matches up well vs San Antonio ... look at the Games 1 and 2 tape ... the eye test doesnt lie ...
0
Quote Originally Posted by basesloaded101:
Heat only play good after a loss look at last series win loss win loss win loss this series same thing they lost game 1 and then killed game 2 now they'll lose tonight and win game 4 watch
Good point but that was agaisnt their NEMESIS: the Indiana Pacers, who took 2 of 3 games in the regular season against the Heat ...
Miami matches up well vs San Antonio ... look at the Games 1 and 2 tape ... the eye test doesnt lie ...
Look at the games charts ... Miami only lost the 4Q of game 1, thats it ...
Spurs also shot 41% in the 1st 2 games. I expect that fg% to go way up at home. They still split on the road and if they win 2 of 3 at home, I'd say it's done 6. Those thinking Miami will win 3 in a row are retarded. There's no reason to think SA can't have a blowout win at home either
0
Quote Originally Posted by alecboyh:
Look at the games charts ... Miami only lost the 4Q of game 1, thats it ...
Spurs also shot 41% in the 1st 2 games. I expect that fg% to go way up at home. They still split on the road and if they win 2 of 3 at home, I'd say it's done 6. Those thinking Miami will win 3 in a row are retarded. There's no reason to think SA can't have a blowout win at home either
Spurs also shot 41% in the 1st 2 games. I expect that fg% to go way up at home. They still split on the road and if they win 2 of 3 at home, I'd say it's done 6. Those thinking Miami will win 3 in a row are retarded. There's no reason to think SA can't have a blowout win at home either
Sentence like this just make me feel better about the Heat ...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kurylyk98:
Spurs also shot 41% in the 1st 2 games. I expect that fg% to go way up at home. They still split on the road and if they win 2 of 3 at home, I'd say it's done 6. Those thinking Miami will win 3 in a row are retarded. There's no reason to think SA can't have a blowout win at home either
Sentence like this just make me feel better about the Heat ...
What's so offensive about the spurs possibly blowing out the heat? It is entirely possible, and vice versa. I think your thinking is a bit bias here, alec.
0
What's so offensive about the spurs possibly blowing out the heat? It is entirely possible, and vice versa. I think your thinking is a bit bias here, alec.
Oh btw, your reasoning that the heat is outplaying the spurs and this will correlate with them winning the series is baseless. The pacers outplayed the heat in the last series for a big majority of the quarters. Yet, the heat still won the series.
0
Oh btw, your reasoning that the heat is outplaying the spurs and this will correlate with them winning the series is baseless. The pacers outplayed the heat in the last series for a big majority of the quarters. Yet, the heat still won the series.
Sentence like this just make me feel better about the Heat ...
How so? If the Heat had won game 2 by 2 or 3 points everyone would be talking about bad of shape they are in the series. You don't think SA can shoot better than 41%? Who cares what happened in the 1st 2 games now. Series is tied and if SA wins 2 of 3 at home, I think Miami will lose this series!
0
Quote Originally Posted by alecboyh:
Sentence like this just make me feel better about the Heat ...
How so? If the Heat had won game 2 by 2 or 3 points everyone would be talking about bad of shape they are in the series. You don't think SA can shoot better than 41%? Who cares what happened in the 1st 2 games now. Series is tied and if SA wins 2 of 3 at home, I think Miami will lose this series!
How so? If the Heat had won game 2 by 2 or 3 points everyone would be talking about bad of shape they are in the series. You don't think SA can shoot better than 41%? Who cares what happened in the 1st 2 games now. Series is tied and if SA wins 2 of 3 at home, I think Miami will lose this series!
IF WOULD... we'll see tonight ... GL ...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kurylyk98:
How so? If the Heat had won game 2 by 2 or 3 points everyone would be talking about bad of shape they are in the series. You don't think SA can shoot better than 41%? Who cares what happened in the 1st 2 games now. Series is tied and if SA wins 2 of 3 at home, I think Miami will lose this series!
Oh btw, your reasoning that the heat is outplaying the spurs and this will correlate with them winning the series is baseless. The pacers outplayed the heat in the last series for a big majority of the quarters. Yet, the heat still won the series.
Let me do a research ... and I will tell you if youre right about that one ...
0
Quote Originally Posted by linewatcher:
Oh btw, your reasoning that the heat is outplaying the spurs and this will correlate with them winning the series is baseless. The pacers outplayed the heat in the last series for a big majority of the quarters. Yet, the heat still won the series.
Let me do a research ... and I will tell you if youre right about that one ...
Oh btw, your reasoning that the heat is outplaying the spurs and this will correlate with them winning the series is baseless. The pacers outplayed the heat in the last series for a big majority of the quarters. Yet, the heat still won the series.
NOT TRUE ...CHECK THIS ...
IN THE INDY SERIES MIAMI WON 15 QUARTERS (INCLUDING OT) OF 29 (INCLUDING OT), WITH 3 TIED QUARTERS AND INDIANA WON 11 ... MIAMI BARELY OUTPLAYED INDY, THATS WHY THE SERIES TOOK 7 GAMES ...
FIRST TWO GAMES IN THE INDY SERIES, MIAMI WON 4 QUARTERS AND THE OT, ONE QUARTER WAS TIED, WHILE INDIANA WON 3 QUARTERS ... WHICH MEANS THEY WERE TOE WITH TOE WITH THE HEAT ...
NOW IN THE FINALS, MIAMI HAS WON 6 QUARTERS, ONE QUARTER TIED, AND ONLY ONE QUARTER WON BY SPURS ... WHICH LUCKILY FOR SAN ANTONIO GOT A WIN BY WINNING THAT ONE QUARTER BY A GOOD MARGIN ... BUT IN THE LONG VIEW, MIAMI HAS OUTPLAYED SAN ANTONIO ...
THE EYE TEST DOESNT LIE ...
THE NUMBERS ARE COLD HARD FACTS ...
MAYBE THIS CAN CHANGE AT SAN ANTONIO ...
BUT MY GUESS IS THAT THE HEAT WILL PREVAIL TONIGHT ...
0
Quote Originally Posted by linewatcher:
Oh btw, your reasoning that the heat is outplaying the spurs and this will correlate with them winning the series is baseless. The pacers outplayed the heat in the last series for a big majority of the quarters. Yet, the heat still won the series.
NOT TRUE ...CHECK THIS ...
IN THE INDY SERIES MIAMI WON 15 QUARTERS (INCLUDING OT) OF 29 (INCLUDING OT), WITH 3 TIED QUARTERS AND INDIANA WON 11 ... MIAMI BARELY OUTPLAYED INDY, THATS WHY THE SERIES TOOK 7 GAMES ...
FIRST TWO GAMES IN THE INDY SERIES, MIAMI WON 4 QUARTERS AND THE OT, ONE QUARTER WAS TIED, WHILE INDIANA WON 3 QUARTERS ... WHICH MEANS THEY WERE TOE WITH TOE WITH THE HEAT ...
NOW IN THE FINALS, MIAMI HAS WON 6 QUARTERS, ONE QUARTER TIED, AND ONLY ONE QUARTER WON BY SPURS ... WHICH LUCKILY FOR SAN ANTONIO GOT A WIN BY WINNING THAT ONE QUARTER BY A GOOD MARGIN ... BUT IN THE LONG VIEW, MIAMI HAS OUTPLAYED SAN ANTONIO ...
THE EYE TEST DOESNT LIE ...
THE NUMBERS ARE COLD HARD FACTS ...
MAYBE THIS CAN CHANGE AT SAN ANTONIO ...
BUT MY GUESS IS THAT THE HEAT WILL PREVAIL TONIGHT ...
NOW IN THE FINALS, MIAMI HAS WON 6 QUARTERS, ONE QUARTER TIED, AND ONLY ONE QUARTER WON BY SPURS ... WHICH LUCKILY FOR SAN ANTONIO GOT A WIN BY WINNING THAT ONE QUARTER BY A GOOD MARGIN ... BUT IN THE LONG VIEW, MIAMI HAS OUTPLAYED SAN ANTONIO ...
________________
Facts are true, but both games were in Miami. You can't leave that piece out.
0
NOW IN THE FINALS, MIAMI HAS WON 6 QUARTERS, ONE QUARTER TIED, AND ONLY ONE QUARTER WON BY SPURS ... WHICH LUCKILY FOR SAN ANTONIO GOT A WIN BY WINNING THAT ONE QUARTER BY A GOOD MARGIN ... BUT IN THE LONG VIEW, MIAMI HAS OUTPLAYED SAN ANTONIO ...
________________
Facts are true, but both games were in Miami. You can't leave that piece out.
NOW IN THE FINALS, MIAMI HAS WON 6 QUARTERS, ONE QUARTER TIED, AND ONLY ONE QUARTER WON BY SPURS ... WHICH LUCKILY FOR SAN ANTONIO GOT A WIN BY WINNING THAT ONE QUARTER BY A GOOD MARGIN ... BUT IN THE LONG VIEW, MIAMI HAS OUTPLAYED SAN ANTONIO ...
________________
Facts are true, but both games were in Miami. You can't leave that piece out.
Suddenly the Spurs will recover their powers and beat the hell out of the Heat just because they are at HOME right ???? .... really??? ... well I learned my lesson in the SA/MEM series, remember that one??, Memphis was supposed to win at home just because there they were supposed to win ... It was clear Spurs were the better team, just as in the Finals the better team is Miami, and oh by the way we are gettin points ... maybe Im wrong, but Im okay with my choice ...
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
NOW IN THE FINALS, MIAMI HAS WON 6 QUARTERS, ONE QUARTER TIED, AND ONLY ONE QUARTER WON BY SPURS ... WHICH LUCKILY FOR SAN ANTONIO GOT A WIN BY WINNING THAT ONE QUARTER BY A GOOD MARGIN ... BUT IN THE LONG VIEW, MIAMI HAS OUTPLAYED SAN ANTONIO ...
________________
Facts are true, but both games were in Miami. You can't leave that piece out.
Suddenly the Spurs will recover their powers and beat the hell out of the Heat just because they are at HOME right ???? .... really??? ... well I learned my lesson in the SA/MEM series, remember that one??, Memphis was supposed to win at home just because there they were supposed to win ... It was clear Spurs were the better team, just as in the Finals the better team is Miami, and oh by the way we are gettin points ... maybe Im wrong, but Im okay with my choice ...
Spurs also shot 41% in the 1st 2 games. I expect that fg% to go way up at home. They still split on the road and if they win 2 of 3 at home, I'd say it's done 6. Those thinking Miami will win 3 in a row are retarded. There's no reason to think SA can't have a blowout win at home either
You were saying alec? Let me guess? Heat in 6 now?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kurylyk98:
Spurs also shot 41% in the 1st 2 games. I expect that fg% to go way up at home. They still split on the road and if they win 2 of 3 at home, I'd say it's done 6. Those thinking Miami will win 3 in a row are retarded. There's no reason to think SA can't have a blowout win at home either
You were saying alec? Let me guess? Heat in 6 now?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.