| Author: |
[NBA Betting] Topic: Here's a serious problem |
|
SuperSlapem |
 View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2751
Location: |
#1 Posted: 2/12/2013 9:31:41 PM
Play Over when there are key injuries in the first game with those key injuries. Then we all make money. I'd say this is true 80-90 percent of the time unless you can prove otherwise. |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
LookKaPyPy |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
Location: |
#2 Posted: 2/12/2013 9:34:21 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by SuperSlapem:
I'd say this is true 80-90 percent of the time unless you can prove otherwise.
I say that stat is bullshit unless you can prove it isn't.
|
|
quote |
|
SuperSlapem |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2751
Location: |
#3 Posted: 2/12/2013 9:39:11 PM
How is it the possible the books catch a middle on both the total and the spread in the same game.
The spread went from Den -2 to Tor -2.
The total from 208 to 206 or something like that. This makes me think the refs are still involved in fixing games. |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
MrBator |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Legend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42644
Location: Nevada |
#4 Posted: 2/12/2013 9:45:52 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by SuperSlapem:
And I'm not one to scream fixed when I lose but......
How is it the possible the books catch a middle on both the total and the spread in the same game.
The spread went from Den -2 to Tor -2.
The total from 208 to 206 or something like that. This makes me think the refs are still involved in fixing games.
109 + 108 = 207
Well, I'll be darned! You're right! You are, like, SO on to these freakin' crooks!!
|
|
quote |
|
MrBator |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Legend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42644
Location: Nevada |
#5 Posted: 2/12/2013 9:46:17 PM 
Just kiddin' ya.
|
|
quote |
|
|
|
SuperSlapem |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2751
Location: |
#6 Posted: 2/12/2013 9:48:50 PM
If I went back to every game you'd be amazed. Here's a few. When Curry went down for GS both times he was injured the first game went Over. When Duncan went down the first game went Over. When CP3 went down the first game went over. When Rondo went down the first game went Over. When Iguadala and Gallinari went down first game went over which was today. Shall I go further? The point is the public likes to throw large amounts of money on Unders when there are key injuries. Then the games are fixed to go Over. All it takes is a whistle happy ref to send you to the free throw line 50 times or a ref who will let you run back and forth without blowing the whistle as often as long as the points keep piling up. Trust me. I've been monitoring this situation closely and its kinda fishy. |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
Theone324 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
MVP
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 15480
Location: New York |
#7 Posted: 2/12/2013 9:50:38 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by MrBator:
109 + 108 = 207
Well, I'll be darned! You're right! You are, like, SO on to these freakin' crooks!!
|
|
quote |
|
CaliSurferDude |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 88
Location: |
#8 Posted: 2/12/2013 9:52:02 PM
|
|
quote |
|
SuperSlapem |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2751
Location: |
#9 Posted: 2/12/2013 10:01:03 PM
Take heed to what I'm saying fellas.
You will burn money playing Unders because of key injuries. The oddsmakers have already adjusted the totals with these injuries in mind plus they have the refs on their side. |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
LookKaPyPy |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
Location: |
#10 Posted: 2/12/2013 10:03:03 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by SuperSlapem:
@Lookkapypy
If I went back to every game you'd be amazed....Trust me. I've been monitoring this situation closely and its kinda fishy.
No need, I am keeping my amazement for something truly amazing. As for games going over, there is nothing fishy about that. What you have is a reaction of the market (that part is true) which moves the line down. On the game side, you get an open spot for someone to step up, the team moves the ball better (Rondo, Cp -> Bledsoe), there is worse defense being played from someone who is used to playing 20mins vs 2nd units and now has to go 35 vs 1st...and so on...
DWill was out vs Pacers yesterday, that one went under after an OT...when you have a team like Nets that run very slow pace and a ton of bad ISO, doesn't matter who is out.
|
|
quote |
|
SuperSlapem |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2751
Location: |
#11 Posted: 2/12/2013 10:06:25 PM
That is true but at the end of the day all of these games have gone Over. If you got under 208 good for you or whoever. You got lucky.
This is a very interesting trend any good capper or cappers who are interested in patterns, this pattern has a long trail. |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
SuperSlapem |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2751
Location: |
#12 Posted: 2/12/2013 10:12:23 PM
You're talking about 1 BK vs Indi game(two of the lowest scoring teams in the NBA and probably two of the best defenses in the NBA). This is a rare situation. And I didn't say it happens 100% of the time. I said 80-90%. And I think I'm still right about that so if you're making an attempt to prove me wrong then do it. It would take you all night just to figure out what I'm saying holds true. |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
LookKaPyPy |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
Location: |
#13 Posted: 2/12/2013 10:35:12 PM
First game Wes Matthews (and Batum) missed for Blazers ? 92-74 loss to Raptors.
LMA missed one vs Nets, a loss and under @98-85 |
|
quote |
|
SuperSlapem |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2751
Location: |
#14 Posted: 2/12/2013 10:54:48 PM
Seems like you're not getting the point anyway. All I'm saying is that the first game of games with key injuries go Over at a significantly higher rate than Under. |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
Riceboi |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4460
Location: |
#15 Posted: 2/12/2013 11:41:47 PM 
|
|
quote |
|
HiHoldem |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2509
Location: Texas |
#16 Posted: 2/12/2013 11:45:04 PM i like lakers, rockets (will not play), and both unders
bol
|
|
quote |
|
LookKaPyPy |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
Location: |
#17 Posted: 2/13/2013 5:50:20 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by SuperSlapem:
For every game you come up with I'll probably find 4.
Seems like you're not getting the point anyway. All I'm saying is that the first game of games with key injuries go Over at a significantly higher rate than Under.
You are the one not getting the point. I don't mind the angle (which I have explained), but I do mind your way of throwing out nonsensical stats not supported by nor based on any kind of known reality.
Do the homework and show me statistics for the last 5-10 years. Wouldn't that be worth investing your time in, if it's that significant difference?
|
|
quote |