SA backers. Tonights game is in question?

Question

There is plenty of value on LA here. Take a look at SA on back ro backs. Most of them been losses and the games they did win were awfully close. Only a couple of games they won by more than 8 points on a back 2 back. Check it out yourself. I'm not making this up. It should take you no more than 60 sec to see all of this.

followmylead · Answer

There is plenty of value on LA here. Take a look at SA on back ro backs. Most of them been losses and the games they did win were awfully close. Only a couple of games they won by more than 8 points on a back 2 back. Check it out yourself. I'm not making this up. It should take you no more than 60 sec to see all of this.

budwiser · Answer

i see it but what makes you think the clippers haven&#x27;t started thinking about the offseason vacation....

followmylead · Answer

The only time SA layed this number was either at home or against non playoff teams or teams that were plagued with injuries.

followmylead · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;That&#x27;s possible but the feeling of being swept has got to be eatin em up inside. They know they&#x27;re no match. I still think they give it all they got. -7.5 is a lot.

budwiser · Answer

alrite man.  what&#x27;s eating them up inside is not getting swept but getting their asses kicked today after a 22 point lead.  just a day to think about iti have no official play i gotta go through my checks tomorrow

followmylead · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;GL tomorrow

followmylead · Answer

SA team totals&#xD;&#xA;108 game1&#xD;&#xA;105 game 2&#xD;&#xA;96 game 3&#xD;&#xA;? game 4  &#xD;&#xA;b2b -7.5 and the numbers are moving the wrong way. This might be a dumb play but everything points towards a Clippers cover.

stevenp · Answer

utah lost, but covered game four versus the spurs-- the line was 8, i believe.

followmylead · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;Who&#x27;s the better team? Utah or LA? I&#x27;d say Utah is the smarter team. LA can put more numbers up when they get hot.

crown_prince27 · Answer

coz in the regular season Pop rested his starters on a b2b, this time i think his starters will play

followmylead · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;It wasn&#x27;t always b2b&#x27;s. I think he rested them against teams he knew they could beat.

stevenp · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by followmylead]  &#xD;&#xA;Who&#x27;s the better team? Utah or LA? I&#x27;d say Utah is the smarter team. LA can put more numbers up when they get hot.  [/Quote]50-50 utah-clips.  can&#x27;t touch this game.  clips could fold easy.

dankenkit · Answer

San Antonio covered the Utah game easily though. So thinking spurs 1h. Also don&#39;t see san Antonio putting up an 11 point quarter again, and if u think clippers will keep it close maybe the over is a better bet since the spurs will score their points anyway, just a matter how much the clips score. Just my thoughts.

dankenkit · Answer

Oops meant to say san Antonio covered game 4s first half against Utah in earlier comment.

sniper777 · Answer

some valid points for the clipps but you have to believe the clippers heart was ripped out today as was the heart of the other Los angeles team. Both teams are done and may not win again! Good luck either way!

jkrazy2020 · Answer

spurs will destroy thme first half by 20 and than seconed half in the fourth they will slowly let them get closer to 8 and than at the end when game is about to be over some dumbass from clippers willl hit the three to cover so the ones that bought the point on spurs wont win either  clips 7-5 trap

followmylead · Answer

could care less if clippers win. only lookin at the numbers &#x2B;7.5 &#xD;&#xA;I want a KG/TD match

BetCrimes1984 · Answer

SAS is 24-0-1 ATS the last 25 games they&#x27;ve scored at least 90 pts in.

followmylead · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;nice trend. i&#x27;ll keep that in mind. SA numbers have gone down since game 1 but to say they won&#x27;t score 90 is pushin it a bit.

shigzx · Answer

C&#x27;mon man, utah game 4 was the past, SA flinched with disgust back then when they where up 21 at 7mins(i think) left in the 4th and let the benchwarmers play through out coz they thought it was a done game, then when the lead was blown pop needed the big 3 to play AGAIN to close out the game.. I just dont see SA doing the same dumb mistake AGAIN, besides they need all the rest they can for OKC coz i dont think okc/lal gonna go 6..

215Hustler · Answer

Wowwww, some valid points in this thread. My opinion is, this is what the SPURS have been preparing for. 7.5 is nothing for them to cover, if you have been watching them during the series, anytime they have a lead and the bench is in, if the lead is brought down to around 10ish, he will put his starters back in quickly. The SPURS mean business, they want to win this tonite with a nice lead, and then go back home and rest and see who they play next. CLIPS mental has to be shot after yesterday, they gave their all, just to come up short. Its time for their vacation, and BLAKES needs to work on his inside game over the summer.

shigzx · Answer

SA cant afford to take a risk at this point and let LAC cover that means giving up leads to single digit that can very well mean a momentum change, then worst case scenario lose the game.. But as we all know anything can happen in this league like some crazy juju sh*t that almost all people believe and take LAC +7.5, but imma be on the logical side this time and take SAS -7.5

dennisback · Answer

almost the same as the mia@nyk g4 where mia was -8 or sas@uta g4 where sas was also -8 and both times home team covered. but seeing their run after 1Q u would have to think spurs can cover easy, laying this one off

mightiestmojo · Answer

I don&#x27;t think Clips are motivated by the idea of not getting swept. They just want it done. The Knicks won largely due to Amare wanting to make a statement after his stupid hand incident and Jazz game SA let up to let them cover don&#x27;t think Clips have motivation or complacent SA going for them. GL.

buffalo11 · Answer

please don&#x27;t compare the heat to the spurs, it&#x27;s not even close

SA backers. Tonights game is in question?

Hot Forum Topics