Only way I can see is if you wager some on the Celtics +7. You are hoping that the Celtics win outright & worst case scenario, Lakers win but dont cover. Risk $200 on Celtics +7 to brake even if the latter happens. Lakers at -330 moneyline, you would have to wager $990 to win $300 & guaranteed either a $100 profit or a $410 profit.
Only way I can see is if you wager some on the Celtics +7. You are hoping that the Celtics win outright & worst case scenario, Lakers win but dont cover. Risk $200 on Celtics +7 to brake even if the latter happens. Lakers at -330 moneyline, you would have to wager $990 to win $300 & guaranteed either a $100 profit or a $410 profit.
Only way I can see is if you wager some on the Celtics +7. You are hoping that the Celtics win outright & worst case scenario, Lakers win but dont cover. Risk $200 on Celtics +7 to brake even if the latter happens. Lakers at -330 moneyline, you would have to wager $990 to win $300 & guaranteed either a $100 profit or a $410 profit.
My fault, you are receiving $2,800 if the Celtics win, im losing it. I would wager $990 to win $300 on Lakers moneyline, a profit of $100 or a profit of $1,810
Only way I can see is if you wager some on the Celtics +7. You are hoping that the Celtics win outright & worst case scenario, Lakers win but dont cover. Risk $200 on Celtics +7 to brake even if the latter happens. Lakers at -330 moneyline, you would have to wager $990 to win $300 & guaranteed either a $100 profit or a $410 profit.
My fault, you are receiving $2,800 if the Celtics win, im losing it. I would wager $990 to win $300 on Lakers moneyline, a profit of $100 or a profit of $1,810
dont be greedy, hedge it primes way. 100% profit. i personally think the lakers will blow the celts out of the water especeally with no perkins. good luck either way
dont be greedy, hedge it primes way. 100% profit. i personally think the lakers will blow the celts out of the water especeally with no perkins. good luck either way
With your +1400, I really don't understand why you didn't hedge the Lakers series price at -110 before game 6. That would of been a PERFECT hedge.
Yes I know I am talking in hindsight, but with your +1400 that would of been the play whether you thought the Celtics win game 6 or not...
I know, I just figured the price would have been similar for game 7. I didn't think the lake show would be such big favorites. I still like the celtics to win it, so if I didn't have the future bet in play I would probably put some money on them moneyline...so risking 990 on the lakers doesnt make sense to me...
With your +1400, I really don't understand why you didn't hedge the Lakers series price at -110 before game 6. That would of been a PERFECT hedge.
Yes I know I am talking in hindsight, but with your +1400 that would of been the play whether you thought the Celtics win game 6 or not...
I know, I just figured the price would have been similar for game 7. I didn't think the lake show would be such big favorites. I still like the celtics to win it, so if I didn't have the future bet in play I would probably put some money on them moneyline...so risking 990 on the lakers doesnt make sense to me...
i mean if you dont mind letting 200 go then let it ride but I am always so shocked at these threads when the people pose the question and then do not take the for sure money! There is a way to bet where you end up with more money than you started. Isnt that the idea in the long run? You made a great investment and now are in an opportunity to walk away with cash!
i mean if you dont mind letting 200 go then let it ride but I am always so shocked at these threads when the people pose the question and then do not take the for sure money! There is a way to bet where you end up with more money than you started. Isnt that the idea in the long run? You made a great investment and now are in an opportunity to walk away with cash!
I know, I just figured the price would have been similar for game 7. I didn't think the lake show would be such big favorites. I still like the celtics to win it, so if I didn't have the future bet in play I would probably put some money on them moneyline...so risking 990 on the lakers doesnt make sense to me...
Still not sure what I'll do
You thought the game 7 price would be anywhere NEAR -110?
I know, I just figured the price would have been similar for game 7. I didn't think the lake show would be such big favorites. I still like the celtics to win it, so if I didn't have the future bet in play I would probably put some money on them moneyline...so risking 990 on the lakers doesnt make sense to me...
Still not sure what I'll do
You thought the game 7 price would be anywhere NEAR -110?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.