God this makes no sense .not any valid reasons behind this pick .. When your reasoning is because some guys on Covers likes or doesn't like doesn't make much sense . Not dis crediting the names you mentioned and there ability ,but using Covers as a gauge of what people are betting is beyond foolish .The handful of people on this site is a blip on the national radar ..
If you want to use others thought process how about Jon Gruden "the Pats will lose because they wont contain both Wilson and Lynch
How about this for a Covers consensus ...
Seems like the gamblers breaking down the game are on Seahawks the fans ,with no breakdowns are on thePats
Hawks win 27-24
God this makes no sense .not any valid reasons behind this pick .. When your reasoning is because some guys on Covers likes or doesn't like doesn't make much sense . Not dis crediting the names you mentioned and there ability ,but using Covers as a gauge of what people are betting is beyond foolish .The handful of people on this site is a blip on the national radar ..
If you want to use others thought process how about Jon Gruden "the Pats will lose because they wont contain both Wilson and Lynch
How about this for a Covers consensus ...
Seems like the gamblers breaking down the game are on Seahawks the fans ,with no breakdowns are on thePats
Hawks win 27-24
God this makes no sense .not any valid reasons behind this pick .. When your reasoning is because some guys on Covers likes or doesn't like doesn't make much sense . Not dis crediting the names you mentioned and there ability ,but using Covers as a gauge of what people are betting is beyond foolish .The handful of people on this site is a blip on the national radar ..
If you want to use others thought process how about Jon Gruden "the Pats will lose because they wont contain both Wilson and Lynch
How about this for a Covers consensus ...
Seems like the gamblers breaking down the game are on Seahawks the fans ,with no breakdowns are on thePats
Hawks win 27-24
God this makes no sense .not any valid reasons behind this pick .. When your reasoning is because some guys on Covers likes or doesn't like doesn't make much sense . Not dis crediting the names you mentioned and there ability ,but using Covers as a gauge of what people are betting is beyond foolish .The handful of people on this site is a blip on the national radar ..
If you want to use others thought process how about Jon Gruden "the Pats will lose because they wont contain both Wilson and Lynch
How about this for a Covers consensus ...
Seems like the gamblers breaking down the game are on Seahawks the fans ,with no breakdowns are on thePats
Hawks win 27-24
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.