KC has started out at an insane 8-1 ATS record this year .. rarely in the NFL can teams keep cashing at this pace .. Russell Wilson in his NFL career getting points is 9-1 ATS .. I like this because it tells me Wilson relishes the underdog role and steps up his game when his team is expected to lose .. have to go with Seahawks + 2 .. BOL
KC has started out at an insane 8-1 ATS record this year .. rarely in the NFL can teams keep cashing at this pace .. Russell Wilson in his NFL career getting points is 9-1 ATS .. I like this because it tells me Wilson relishes the underdog role and steps up his game when his team is expected to lose .. have to go with Seahawks + 2 .. BOL
Don;t understand why people use Team results as QB records , Seattle did have a shut down defense that has more to do with their ATS record than Russel Wilson .
They don't have that great defense anymore and their not a very good team on the road , just look at the Carolina game they were lucky to win that game and Carolina could be in a tie with 3 other teams as the worst in the league
Don;t understand why people use Team results as QB records , Seattle did have a shut down defense that has more to do with their ATS record than Russel Wilson .
They don't have that great defense anymore and their not a very good team on the road , just look at the Carolina game they were lucky to win that game and Carolina could be in a tie with 3 other teams as the worst in the league
Lynch is questionable for this one. Seattle's mvp is easily lynch. On the road against a solid chiefs team I would stay away. Wilson will turn the ball over Smith will not. Chiefs in a close one. Charles will relish the role of being the MVP of this game. Also, Seattle's defense isn't nearly as good as last year. Add several key injuries, the fact that it is a road game (at Arrowhead one of the other most difficult places to play), and a lackluster passing attack I would lean chiefs. Best of luck either way.
Lynch is questionable for this one. Seattle's mvp is easily lynch. On the road against a solid chiefs team I would stay away. Wilson will turn the ball over Smith will not. Chiefs in a close one. Charles will relish the role of being the MVP of this game. Also, Seattle's defense isn't nearly as good as last year. Add several key injuries, the fact that it is a road game (at Arrowhead one of the other most difficult places to play), and a lackluster passing attack I would lean chiefs. Best of luck either way.
Kazual I wasn't aware that Lynch is questionable thanks for the update .. I agree without lynch it would be a daunting task but he did practice today so will just wait for more updates on lynch
Kazual I wasn't aware that Lynch is questionable thanks for the update .. I agree without lynch it would be a daunting task but he did practice today so will just wait for more updates on lynch
the chiefs lost Jamaal Charles in the beginning of the first quarter of last year's playoffs against the Colts. I always wonder how that game would have turned out if he played. Just wondering because he is that good of a player. Good luck guys.
the chiefs lost Jamaal Charles in the beginning of the first quarter of last year's playoffs against the Colts. I always wonder how that game would have turned out if he played. Just wondering because he is that good of a player. Good luck guys.
Interesting thing about Seattle is they are on an historical level in combo rushing off and def.
Seahawks ave 5.5 per rush while giving up just 3.2, that is a monster 2.3 differential, that's better than almost every team in the league in ave per pass att diff and certainly could be one of the best ever.
KC aves 4.6 while giving up 4.7, they get out-gained.
Seahawks out rush opp by 91 yards per game compared to KC measly 20 yards per game.
Consider the great 85 Bears and their spectacular defense with Walter Payton ave 4.5 and gave-up 3.7 winning by just .8 and they out-rushed opp by 90 yards per game, Seahawks better in both areas.
Interesting thing about Seattle is they are on an historical level in combo rushing off and def.
Seahawks ave 5.5 per rush while giving up just 3.2, that is a monster 2.3 differential, that's better than almost every team in the league in ave per pass att diff and certainly could be one of the best ever.
KC aves 4.6 while giving up 4.7, they get out-gained.
Seahawks out rush opp by 91 yards per game compared to KC measly 20 yards per game.
Consider the great 85 Bears and their spectacular defense with Walter Payton ave 4.5 and gave-up 3.7 winning by just .8 and they out-rushed opp by 90 yards per game, Seahawks better in both areas.
Interesting thing about Seattle is they are on an historical level in combo rushing off and def.Seahawks ave 5.5 per rush while giving up just 3.2, that is a monster 2.3 differential, that's better than almost every team in the league in ave per pass att diff and certainly could be one of the best ever.KC aves 4.6 while giving up 4.7, they get out-gained.Seahawks out rush opp by 91 yards per game compared to KC measly 20 yards per game.Consider the great 85 Bears and their spectacular defense with Walter Payton ave 4.5 and gave-up 3.7 winning by just .8 and they out-rushed opp by 90 yards per game, Seahawks better in both areas.
These have to be the most irrelevant stats I have ever seen.
Interesting thing about Seattle is they are on an historical level in combo rushing off and def.Seahawks ave 5.5 per rush while giving up just 3.2, that is a monster 2.3 differential, that's better than almost every team in the league in ave per pass att diff and certainly could be one of the best ever.KC aves 4.6 while giving up 4.7, they get out-gained.Seahawks out rush opp by 91 yards per game compared to KC measly 20 yards per game.Consider the great 85 Bears and their spectacular defense with Walter Payton ave 4.5 and gave-up 3.7 winning by just .8 and they out-rushed opp by 90 yards per game, Seahawks better in both areas.
These have to be the most irrelevant stats I have ever seen.
I think KC dink and dunk offense will fall right into Seattle's defense. I think Seattle matches up best with KC style of offense. They feast on plays like those. That's just my two cents though. I'm passing on this play. Best of luck to whatever you guys play
I think KC dink and dunk offense will fall right into Seattle's defense. I think Seattle matches up best with KC style of offense. They feast on plays like those. That's just my two cents though. I'm passing on this play. Best of luck to whatever you guys play
You also contradict yourself when you mention that a reason you dislike KC ATS is because they're 8-1, and teams rarely can keep that up.Yet, on the flip-side Wilson being 9-1 ATS as an underdog is a reason you like him.Hmm… I'm confused.
I think the thought behind that is when a team is doing really well ATS, Vegas always adjusts accordingly, which is why most teams dont end up having a crazy ATS record at season's end. Same holds true with a team's performance against the total. Hence the term "regression to the mean".
The ATS record of Russell Wilson as an underdog, however, is not a stat Vegas adjusts for. So it is actually a pretty telling stat on how he performs in a certain role. 10 isn't a large enough sample size, but he's only played 2.5 seasons. Itd be interesting to see how he performed in an underdog role at Wisconsin. If he still has a great ATS record after that, I'd consider play him as an underdog quite heavily.
Either way, Im on the over. Best of luck to both sides.
You also contradict yourself when you mention that a reason you dislike KC ATS is because they're 8-1, and teams rarely can keep that up.Yet, on the flip-side Wilson being 9-1 ATS as an underdog is a reason you like him.Hmm… I'm confused.
I think the thought behind that is when a team is doing really well ATS, Vegas always adjusts accordingly, which is why most teams dont end up having a crazy ATS record at season's end. Same holds true with a team's performance against the total. Hence the term "regression to the mean".
The ATS record of Russell Wilson as an underdog, however, is not a stat Vegas adjusts for. So it is actually a pretty telling stat on how he performs in a certain role. 10 isn't a large enough sample size, but he's only played 2.5 seasons. Itd be interesting to see how he performed in an underdog role at Wisconsin. If he still has a great ATS record after that, I'd consider play him as an underdog quite heavily.
Either way, Im on the over. Best of luck to both sides.
the chiefs lost Jamaal Charles in the beginning of the first quarter of last year's playoffs against the Colts. I always wonder how that game would have turned out if he played. Just wondering because he is that good of a player. Good luck guys.
I thought the Chiefs were up 900 points without JC???
Oh yea Fat Reid coaches them. Thought it all was a bad dream!!
the chiefs lost Jamaal Charles in the beginning of the first quarter of last year's playoffs against the Colts. I always wonder how that game would have turned out if he played. Just wondering because he is that good of a player. Good luck guys.
I thought the Chiefs were up 900 points without JC???
Oh yea Fat Reid coaches them. Thought it all was a bad dream!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.