doubting it, they will come out with numbers tomorrow, looked like a lot of late money on SF, total opened 52 and was bet down to 47.5 or 48 so they didn't take a bath there...with all the props, parlays and all that crap who knows..
0
doubting it, they will come out with numbers tomorrow, looked like a lot of late money on SF, total opened 52 and was bet down to 47.5 or 48 so they didn't take a bath there...with all the props, parlays and all that crap who knows..
A bath? As if they LOST? You are clueless as f*ck if you think Vegas EVER loses money. Juice is made to make money EVERY TIME,...unless the MONETARY VALUE is UNEVEN so that they don't have enought to pay the winning bets with the losing bets.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pipedoctor:
Am I right?? I'm thinking so
A bath? As if they LOST? You are clueless as f*ck if you think Vegas EVER loses money. Juice is made to make money EVERY TIME,...unless the MONETARY VALUE is UNEVEN so that they don't have enought to pay the winning bets with the losing bets.
doubting it, they will come out with numbers tomorrow, looked like a lot of late money on SF, total opened 52 and was bet down to 47.5 or 48 so they didn't take a bath there...with all the props, parlays and all that crap who knows..
Totals opened at 48, went down to 47 1/2 for a brief time after a couple huge bets on the under and climbed after that. The over took a bath and there was more money on Raven ML then imagined so it will be interesting to see how the props lined up.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ezcomeezgo:
doubting it, they will come out with numbers tomorrow, looked like a lot of late money on SF, total opened 52 and was bet down to 47.5 or 48 so they didn't take a bath there...with all the props, parlays and all that crap who knows..
Totals opened at 48, went down to 47 1/2 for a brief time after a couple huge bets on the under and climbed after that. The over took a bath and there was more money on Raven ML then imagined so it will be interesting to see how the props lined up.
Vegas would never take a bath on single game as big as the SB. They are way too smart to have more money on one side or the other. Not counting juice, they would have bettors' money on either side..
0
Vegas would never take a bath on single game as big as the SB. They are way too smart to have more money on one side or the other. Not counting juice, they would have bettors' money on either side..
I'm sure Vegas lost money on this one. With the safety, they are going to have to pay the safety prop and also all those Niners teases. Balti ML was super popular. Anytime the game goes over, it's not good for them. Especially since I'm sure most of the 2nd half bets were on the Niners and over.
0
I'm sure Vegas lost money on this one. With the safety, they are going to have to pay the safety prop and also all those Niners teases. Balti ML was super popular. Anytime the game goes over, it's not good for them. Especially since I'm sure most of the 2nd half bets were on the Niners and over.
Over hurt them, but I think the love on the game was for the Niners. My local got a ton of action just from people saying Ray Lewis should be in jail.....
0
Over hurt them, but I think the love on the game was for the Niners. My local got a ton of action just from people saying Ray Lewis should be in jail.....
Every book in Vegas got hurt on the Over and Ravens ML. Lots of late money on the 49ers helped.
I'm just going to give you a lesson here...."ticket counts" have NOTHING to do with the AMOUNT OF MONEY ON EACH SIDE.
The amount of money on each side is nealy EQUAL, but within the "juice window" so they make money EVERYTIME from the JUICE.
If 60% were on Niners and 74% on the Over, all that is saying is the PERCENTAGE OF TICKETS THAT CAME IN ONE EACH SIDE.
If 60% of the "tickets" were on the Niners, that means that the 40% on the Ravens were BIGGER. If 74% of the "tickets" were on the Over, that means that the 26% of the Unders were Less Bets, but Bigger Amounts.
Vegas and the books make juice on the JUICE on even amounts of money on each side so they can pay off the winners with the losers and juice they made EVERYTIME, NOT THE AMOUNT OF TICKETS.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:
Ticket counts: 60% 49er, 74% Over
Every book in Vegas got hurt on the Over and Ravens ML. Lots of late money on the 49ers helped.
I'm just going to give you a lesson here...."ticket counts" have NOTHING to do with the AMOUNT OF MONEY ON EACH SIDE.
The amount of money on each side is nealy EQUAL, but within the "juice window" so they make money EVERYTIME from the JUICE.
If 60% were on Niners and 74% on the Over, all that is saying is the PERCENTAGE OF TICKETS THAT CAME IN ONE EACH SIDE.
If 60% of the "tickets" were on the Niners, that means that the 40% on the Ravens were BIGGER. If 74% of the "tickets" were on the Over, that means that the 26% of the Unders were Less Bets, but Bigger Amounts.
Vegas and the books make juice on the JUICE on even amounts of money on each side so they can pay off the winners with the losers and juice they made EVERYTIME, NOT THE AMOUNT OF TICKETS.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.