NFL_Sharp Week 15 Picks, Rankings, and Projections (32-14-2 Sides YTD, 69.6%)

Forum: NFL Betting Page 2 of 3  1 2 3  
Author: [NFL Betting] Topic: NFL_Sharp Week 15 Picks, Rankings, and Projections (32-14-2 Sides YTD, 69.6%)
RDTTKA12 PM RDTTKA12
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 260
 
RDTTKA12
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 9:12:02 AM
Looking good yet another week Sharp, thanks for all the info!  BOL
BigUnit PM BigUnit
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 19394
Nevada
 
BigUnit
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 10:00:52 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by NFL_Sharp:


My plays are made based on the stats that generate these projections, not the projections themselves.  I don't bet simply based on these projections, they are just interesting and helpful tools in my opinion.  As I said last week, sometimes the game flow will lead to anomalous outcomes, as the projections are based on averages across the underlying stats.  Most of the time, game flow will be near enough to the projected values that the projections will be fairly accurate.  Sometimes, it won't.  Adding up across the stat projections will prove inaccurate in these occurrences.  The underlying stats are better predictors of this, and that's why they're used by the system instead of the projections.

So flip a coin?

Teaser78 PM Teaser78
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13412
New Jersey
 
Teaser78
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 11:55:25 AM
How and in what world are the bears ranked #1? please explain? they suck
hammer22 PM hammer22
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9033
Michigan
 
hammer22
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 1:35:20 PM
In your predictions you don't have a single team this week scoring over 29 pts? And the highest scoring team is Miami with 29. Why is that?
Thaistix PM Thaistix
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1451
California
 
Thaistix
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 2:12:48 PM

I dont get how Seattle can be next to dead last (31) on defense when they just shut out Cards 58-0 ?

I think Seattle Defense is top 8..!

 

bet2winagain PM bet2winagain
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 612
California
 
bet2winagain
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 2:18:58 PM
5dollarunit PM 5dollarunit
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 30
 
5dollarunit
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 2:22:33 PM
Seattle at 32 who gave 0 points to Arizona last week. Don't understand this ranking.
Posted using a mobile device.
sharpshooter5 PM sharpshooter5
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 12
 
sharpshooter5
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 3:23:01 PM
mp5070 PM mp5070
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5188
 
mp5070
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 3:26:40 PM
RDTTKA12 PM RDTTKA12
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 260
 
RDTTKA12
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 3:46:43 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by 5dollarunit:

Seattle at 32 who gave 0 points to Arizona last week. Don't understand this ranking.


this is perhaps why we aren't the guy clipping at 70%......
keepitstrict PM keepitstrict
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 11113
District of
              Columbia
 
keepitstrict
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 4:58:40 PM
Stevedore PM Stevedore
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 472
California
 
Stevedore
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 6:49:51 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by tuco:



perhaps these rankings show the strength of play (ATS) for this particular week, not the rankings in their usual sense.

in this case, i agree, the bears will beat packers this week, SU.
Based on what? Gut instinct?  GB has dominated this series and have won every BIG game against Chicago.  It's for the division and against the Bears, GB won't come out flat.

Only way the Bears win is if GB gifts the game to the Bears by turnovers or it's a flag fest against GB like 3 years ago; big if's if you ask me.
NFL_Sharp PM NFL_Sharp
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 179
 
NFL_Sharp
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 10:36:13 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by hammer22:

In your predictions you don't have a single team this week scoring over 29 pts? And the highest scoring team is Miami with 29. Why is that?

My model accounts for turnovers, but only minimally.  And in the case where they could still be overweighted based on recent performances, there is an even greater limit put on them.  Turnovers are impossible to predict, and these often lead to quick, easy points (either by pick sixes, short field, etc).  Similarly, my model does not account for special teams at all - so a great punt return setting up a score, or a blocked punt, etc, are not included whatsoever in the model.  I feel completely justified in doing this, as picking the team with bad turnovers leading to points or big special teams plays would be a losing battle, by a long shot (even if the most turnover-prone team were to play the defense that forced the most).  So, I'm sure that my model understates scores to a certain degree.  That's why I've said that overs perform a bit better than unders in my model (which they do, based on past results).  But there are also cases where a turnover in the opponent's redzone can take points off the board, and there are certainly a large percentage of games without a key turnover or special teams play leading directly to points that otherwise were not "earned" through efficient offensive football.  So overall, while there is a certain factor that cannot be accounted for and inevitably accounts for an underweighting of scores, the significance is not by any means enormous, and I'm confident these projections are very accurate.

Plugging in the actual stats from last week's Ari/Sea game into the model gives a score of 34-1 Seattle.  A lot of points taken off the board for Seattle - directly as a result of the effects of the 8 turnovers (my model limits these).  Without a limit, the score would be projected 45-0.  But how often does a team turn the ball over 8 times in a game - this is clearly an outlier and no cause for alarm.

Good luck this week.   
Petex99 PM Petex99
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 627
United States
 
Petex99
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 10:41:18 PM
good luck
NFL_Sharp PM NFL_Sharp
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 179
 
NFL_Sharp
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 10:50:35 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Thaistix:

I dont get how Seattle can be next to dead last (31) on defense when they just shut out Cards 58-0 ?

I think Seattle Defense is top 8..!


I agree - for the entire season I think Seattle definitely has a top 8 defense.  But not over the past 3 weeks, efficiency wise.  Certainly a shutout improves their ranking, but how much of the shutout was due to turnovers - and the system also takes SOS into account - how impressive is it for a top caliber defense to give up minimal points to a bottom dwelling offense (with the benefit of 8 turnovers no less).  The previous week, the far below average offense of the Bears was very efficient (9 YPA, 4YPR, no sacks allowed, etc, etc), and the week before that, a below average Miami offense performed similarly (9.5 YPA, 6.8 YPR, etc, etc).  This is where my model excels - in the face of bias (I'm not trying to insult you or anyone else at all - humans are biased - I'm the same way).  On the outside, everyone sees a 58-0, 8 forced turnover massacre of the Cardinals and thinks Seattle's defense is playing at an elite level.  They fail to remember the previous two weeks against inferior (even compared to the average) offenses, where that same defense allowed an average YPA over 9 (very high) and average YPR over 5 (very high) to go along with other poor defensive stats. 

I don't disagree that Seattle has a top level defense.  But I only care about how they're playing now.  And "now" doesn't mean the previous game that can be filled with almost entirely random noise (like 8 turnovers).  In my model, now means the previous three weeks, where Seattle has performed poorly, even if they had been facing above average offenses.  The fact that the two were far below average only drops them further in the rankings.  A shutout of one of, if not the worst offense in the league, helps their ranking, but isn't near enough to dig them out of the hole dug by their previous two showings against below average offenses.

I truly wasn't trying to sound arrogant or condescending, if I came across that way.  Good luck this week sir.

NFL_Sharp PM NFL_Sharp
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 179
 
NFL_Sharp
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 10:52:20 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by 5dollarunit:

Seattle at 32 who gave 0 points to Arizona last week. Don't understand this ranking.

See the above post.  Good luck this week.
NFL_Sharp PM NFL_Sharp
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 179
 
NFL_Sharp
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 11:01:15 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Teaser78:

How and in what world are the bears ranked #1? please explain? they suck

Defense has performed with a high efficiency the past three weeks.  The offense played very efficiently against a good Seattle defense, and turnovers have plagued their efficiency in the previous two vs Minnesota - neither of which were terrible performances.  My model limits the effect turnovers have as they are unpredictable.  Chicago's top ranking is based in large part to them being above average on both sides of the ball, over the past three, SOS adjusted.  Most teams are significantly deficient on one side or the other, which brings their overall ranking down.  The Bears previous three have been solid on both sides.  Most will look at the scores, see a 1-2 record against Seattle at home and Minnesota twice and call the Bears awful.  Efficiency stats (best suited to beat the spread over the long run, in my opinion) say otherwise.

Good luck this week sir.
NFL_Sharp PM NFL_Sharp
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 179
 
NFL_Sharp
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/13/2012 11:01:57 PM
Thanks for all the good luck everyone else.  Best of luck to you all this week.  
ROCKON PM ROCKON
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 174
Ontario
 
ROCKON
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/14/2012 2:51:56 AM
Good luck sharp  Keep doing what your doing budDo you use the same system for you in the playoffs?
phixer PM phixer
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4174
 
phixer
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/14/2012 3:52:27 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by bobafett:

imma give myself credit for bein "sharp"....im on all ya plays cept TB and the jets total....(not that i dont agree...they just dont standout to me some of the others).....
like anybody gives a flying sh  i t what you agree and what you don't. You also came into my thread which had more or less same plays and called them bulls i t. Get some life!
phixer PM phixer
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4174
 
phixer
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/14/2012 3:54:22 AM
and bobafett -learn to read - NFL_Sharp did not give Jets total - I did pick over you confused idiot
phixer PM phixer
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4174
 
phixer
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/14/2012 3:56:22 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by bobafett:

imma give myself credit for bein "sharp


He's giving himself a credit. Why credit - pay yourself
bigkaptain PM bigkaptain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1121
Nevada
 
bigkaptain
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/14/2012 3:57:06 AM
juliansorrel PM juliansorrel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 268
Quebec
 
juliansorrel
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/14/2012 4:43:55 AM
808rushem PM 808rushem
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
 
808rushem
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/14/2012 5:02:05 AM
sharing any type of system, or info is always welcomed. win, or lose. its up to all of us to tread on it
Forum: NFL Betting Page 2 of 3  1 2 3  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.