| Author: |
[NFL Betting] Topic: Crazy Irishman's "bet your wife and mother in law" bets WEEK 14 |
|
Mick960 |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Caesars Palace | |

Prospect
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 368
Location: New York |
#126 Posted: 12/9/2012 7:17:06 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:
Goes to show- ya dont never know. JG Well, that approach applies to any aspect of life my philosophical friend. At the same time, there's not such a thing as you never know. What you know is not gonna always hit 100% - that's the truth. You count the money at the stairs (if it's an ok neighborhood of course) |
|
quote |
|
Mick960 |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Caesars Palace | |

Prospect
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 368
Location: New York |
#127 Posted: 12/9/2012 7:59:05 PM So far: Vikings - Bears Under 39.5 1100$ to win 1000$Pats - Texans Under 52 1100$ to win 1000$ Bears -3 (+100) 2000$ to win 2000$ Giants -5 2200$ to win 2000 Bills -3 1150$ to win 1000$ Bengals -3 2400$ to win 2000$ Packers - Lions Under 51 1100$ to win 1000$ Raiders - Broncos Over 47 1100$ to win 1000$ Ravens +3 1300$ to win 1000$
|
|
quote |
|
Mick960 |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Caesars Palace | |

Prospect
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 368
Location: New York |
#128 Posted: 12/9/2012 11:50:04 PM Feels good to be on a right side of a fix. UNDER. It was a "ridiculous" decision on Detroit with 12 seconds left to kick in the FG. But I have no problem with that!!!
So far: Vikings - Bears Under 39.5 1100$ to win 1000$ = 2100$Pats - Texans Under 52 1100$ to win 1000$ =? Bears -3 (+100) 2000$ to win 2000$ =0 Giants -5 2200$ to win 2000 = 4200$ Bills -3 1150$ to win 1000$ =0 Bengals -3 2400$ to win 2000$ =0 Packers - Lions Under 51 1100$ to win 1000$ = 2100$ Raiders - Broncos Over 47 1100$ to win 1000$ =0 Ravens +3 1300$ to win 1000$ = 1300$
|
|
quote |
|
Mick960 |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Caesars Palace | |

Prospect
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 368
Location: New York |
#129 Posted: 12/10/2012 12:14:13 AM Ok, now, after recovering 9700$, we have an Under play on MNF.Last week we hit the Grand Parlay playing with last 3500$ ending up collecting 13045$. First of all - I'm adding another 3300$ on Under 51 to collect 6300$ and will weigh parlay during the day. So - added play (we already have Under 52 Pats - Texans for 1100$ to win 1000$) is Under 51 Pats - Texans 3300$ to win 3000$ GL |
|
quote |
|
consiSTence |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 139
Location: |
#130 Posted: 12/10/2012 7:32:00 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:
Ravens record this year is better w/o Lewis, just as it was last time he was out.
Which is why the first game Lewis was out they got whooped by Houston right? And the wins coming after were all off sub-par teams, excluding pittsburgh, but that game was without Roethlisberger.
Not saying it has deep impact, but it takes time to cope and adapt. |
|
quote |
|
|
|
tinoker55 |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |

MVP
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 18222
Location: Jamaica |
#131 Posted: 12/10/2012 9:18:46 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by Mick960: Feels good to be on a right side of a fix. UNDER. It was a "ridiculous" decision on Detroit with 12 seconds left to kick in the FG. But I have no problem with that!!!
So far:
Vikings - Bears Under 39.5 1100$ to win 1000$ = 2100$
Pats - Texans Under 52 1100$ to win 1000$ =?
Bears -3 (+100) 2000$ to win 2000$ =0
Giants -5 2200$ to win 2000 = 4200$
Bills -3 1150$ to win 1000$ =0
Bengals -3 2400$ to win 2000$ =0
Packers - Lions Under 51 1100$ to win 1000$ = 2100$
Raiders - Broncos Over 47 1100$ to win 1000$ =0
Ravens +3 1300$ to win 1000$ = 1300$
Why was it a FIX when they needed 10 points to tie...doesnt matter field goal 1st or touchdown 1st, you still need 10 points.. |
|
quote |
|
phixer |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Rookie
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 561
Location: |
#132 Posted: 12/10/2012 11:29:31 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by tinoker55: Why was it a FIX when they needed 10 points to tie...doesnt matter field goal 1st or touchdown 1st, you still need 10 points..
I wasn't on Under like Ole Mick. I had over parlayed with other 3 picks that all won. Ask me if that was not a fix. May be fix is a rude word - let's say - the teams avoided going over. They could first score a TD and then worry about the FG. But no - they chose to score FG first which left them 7 seconds to try on side kick, recover it and also score a TD. Dies it make sense? So kneel altogether, but don't bull garbage us with FG and TD hopes later! |
|
quote |
|
Wizerguy |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

All-Star
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10493
Location: Florida |
#133 Posted: 12/10/2012 7:21:17 PM Top of the evening to ya mate !...my season went to ireland many moons ago lad. However, I still fight the good fight because Ive been playing the house for years.....cherio !  |
|
quote |
|
Mick960 |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Caesars Palace | |

Prospect
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 368
Location: New York |
#134 Posted: 12/10/2012 10:05:05 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Wizerguy: Top of the evening to ya mate !...my season went to ireland many moons ago lad. However, I still fight the good fight because Ive been playing the house for years.....cherio !
Slainte ole mate!  I love the poetry in your words, makes me sad and happy at the same time! Cherio! |
|
quote |
|
Mick960 |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Caesars Palace | |

Prospect
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 368
Location: New York |
#135 Posted: 12/10/2012 10:06:39 PM Those two 4th down "attempts" were a testimony to what I've been saying all this time. UNDER!!! |
|
quote |
|
BET THE HOOK |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com | |

Rookie
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 862
Location: Florida |
#136 Posted: 12/10/2012 11:35:00 PM Ouch!! |
|
quote |
|
binger1 |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 489
Location: Missouri |
#137 Posted: 12/10/2012 11:41:03 PM  |
|
quote |
|
Mick960 |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Caesars Palace | |

Prospect
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 368
Location: New York |
#138 Posted: 12/10/2012 11:50:54 PM That was hideous turnover by a stupid kid who wanted the get the fame in a garbage time. But I'm a man and will take it as a man. No complains. If there is a thing called bad luck - this was it. It was all Under and anyone saying otherwise is full of s h i t. Lost 4400$ on this play. |
|
quote |
|
phixer |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Rookie
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 561
Location: |
#139 Posted: 12/11/2012 1:13:30 AM Painful. Even Mk was on Under and lost. Get your s..t together and cap the next week. GL carzy irishman! |
|
quote |
|
bigslickk |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Rookie
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 932
Location: Ontario |
#140 Posted: 12/11/2012 2:49:08 PM This thread is  |
|
quote |