Messages

Forum Index : NFL Betting : Messages Page 13 of 28 «  11 12 13 14 15   »
Author: [NFL Betting] Topic: Ive created a football program that ive tested and want to share
RDTTKA12 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
RDTTKA12
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 244
Location:
#301
Posted: 12/10/2012 3:53:14 PM
AFN,

Hell of job this weekend bud, you cleaned house!  Perhaps we could get a little MNF preview with some numbers for the HOU @ NE game tonight?
My lean is Pats -3 from my local
quote
aKaGeeMan send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
aKaGeeMan
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 613
Location: New Jersey
#302
Posted: 12/10/2012 4:49:15 PM
Gotta love you morons posting plays in someone else's thread, losers
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
AFNfootballnerd send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
AFNfootballnerd
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 913
Location:
#303
Posted: 12/10/2012 6:49:39 PM
Houston 18% NE 24% overall efficiency matchup

Houston 7% NE 18% offense

Houston -18% NE 1% defense

Houston behind in offense but a huge differential in defense numbers...

Pick Houston +5.5 and Houston ML
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
RxMang17 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
RxMang17
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 16
Location:
#304
Posted: 12/11/2012 7:13:53 AM
Firstly, AFN, I have been very impressed with this system!

However, did last night's game expose a flaw? Specifically, my question is: how exactly does the system quantify recent play vs play over the whole season? I know you've mentioned that it weights recent play heavier than historical play, but what defines "recent?" I have noticed (more from a fantasy football perspective) that HOU D/ST has been bad since Week 11, whereas NE D/ST has been looking pretty good since Week 11. Essentially, I was surprised by the defensive differential (i.e., -18% vs average) the system computed. 

Also, does it take into account when players (especially those who are directly involved in many play outcomes) are out for the game? I know your program records every play, but does it record the players involved affecting the outcomes? Quantifying injury-induced effects on expected performance would be BAWSE!

Thanks again for your work! Have a good one. 
quote
JAl239
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
JAl239
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 167
Location:
#305
Posted: 12/11/2012 12:08:43 PM
You ogininally posted NE-3. Awesome job on the other picks.
quote
CanadaCup
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
CanadaCup
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8122
Location: Canada
#306
Posted: 12/11/2012 12:14:45 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:




13-6 overall for low spreads 8 and under....

13-9 with those 3 double digit spread games (Pitt, arizona, raiders)

So its official no more double digit spreads as its not profitable in the long run... but 13-6  so far on 8 and under spreads not bad +700 units so far

quote
jerry18 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
jerry18
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 84
Location: Slovenia
#307
Posted: 12/11/2012 2:57:42 PM
nice job AFN! I have one small request :) could you please post your plays a little bit earlier, beacuse i am from Europe and time difference is quite big :) if not no problem :)
quote
AFNfootballnerd send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
AFNfootballnerd
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 913
Location:
#308
Posted: 12/11/2012 5:08:42 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by JAl239:

You ogininally posted NE-3. Awesome job on the other picks.

Yes I did...have a confession...and absolutely will not do it again! I had better numbers for NE but my bias got in the way and I altered the numbers to make it look better for Texans because I wanted Brady and patriots to lose...buddy of mine got into it about patriots will win the Super Bowl and I took it personal and tried to fade him  will not let bias do that again apoligizes to whoever tailed MNF 
quote
AFNfootballnerd send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
AFNfootballnerd
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 913
Location:
#309
Posted: 12/11/2012 5:12:17 PM
So should be 14-6 if sticking by program but 13-8 on moronic bias decision...need to just stick to the PROGRAM! 
quote
suitcase_tommy
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
suitcase_tommy
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Location: California
#310
Posted: 12/11/2012 5:46:51 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:

So should be 14-6 if sticking by program but 13-8 on moronic bias decision...need to just stick to the PROGRAM! 

Awesome job AFNfootballnerd!!! Keep it up and thanks a ton for posting! Please let us know when you start posting your NBA plays. Thanks again!

 

quote
AFNfootballnerd send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
AFNfootballnerd
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 913
Location:
#311
Posted: 12/11/2012 9:27:43 PM
NBA Bulls ML
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
johnpolino04 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: bet365 |
johnpolino04
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 324
Location: New York
#312
Posted: 12/11/2012 10:23:30 PM
No money ball pall Tom bradley is not approved of system specially if you playing on MA home.... good luck next time
quote
johnpolino04 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: bet365 |
johnpolino04
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 324
Location: New York
#313
Posted: 12/11/2012 11:32:54 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:

NBA Bulls ML

u didnt recommend the bulls common hamilton is out thats make then even lower to scored no roses and hamilton now kirk hinrich just recover for hes injury not on hes 100% 
quote
byonusho send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
byonusho
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 448
Location: Nevada
#314
Posted: 12/12/2012 12:13:43 AM

We all have our formulas and I took my Clippers to the bank.
Also, I don't use any bias or listen to others. Everyone should do their own homework and make their own money, but definitely be open to other great ideas to make us all stronger and more profitable.

509-LAC510-CHI
94.2 -3.5
90.7 185.0

 

 

 

quote
henrytran send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
henrytran
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 35
Location:
#315
Posted: 12/12/2012 12:17:39 AM
what is your pick for week 15?? Can you please post it before thursday if you can. thanks alot. Btw very good system.. Nice job 
quote
harps2084 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
harps2084
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4
Location:
#316
Posted: 12/12/2012 12:38:55 AM
good information
quote
iBETnWIN
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
iBETnWIN
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2101
Location: United States
#317
Posted: 12/12/2012 12:47:15 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:


Yes I did...have a confession...and absolutely will not do it again! I had better numbers for NE but my bias got in the way and I altered the numbers to make it look better for Texans because I wanted Brady and patriots to lose...buddy of mine got into it about patriots will win the Super Bowl and I took it personal and tried to fade him  will not let bias do that again apoligizes to whoever tailed MNF 


Haha, that was solid! Appreciate the honesty *salute*

"Maybe I could change the formula and alter the occurrences of real life in my favor with skewed variables!"

Imagine it worked?! The power...THE POWER!!!

Keep up the good work. Very enticing stuff...
quote
AFNfootballnerd send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
AFNfootballnerd
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 913
Location:
#318
Posted: 12/12/2012 3:02:05 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by iBETnWIN:



Haha, that was solid! Appreciate the honesty *salute*

"Maybe I could change the formula and alter the occurrences of real life in my favor with skewed variables!"

Imagine it worked?! The power...THE POWER!!!

  Haha yea....and if u noticed i put Texans ML which i never do....I looked back on my post and can see the bias as i typed Texans ML what an idiot

Keep up the good work. Very enticing stuff...
quote
AFNfootballnerd send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
AFNfootballnerd
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 913
Location:
#319
Posted: 12/12/2012 3:19:44 AM
Ok sticking to the program would have went 5-0 last week if i stayed away from Double digit (arizona) spread and my bias for patriots to win the superbowl

STICK TO THE PROGRAM!

Week 15 picks...

Cincy -4
Denver -2.5
Giants +2
Dallas +2
Carolina +3

1 Unit parlay Cincy Denver Carolina Giants


quote
austintx11 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
austintx11
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1728
Location: Texas
#320
Posted: 12/12/2012 3:23:12 AM
13-6 overall for low spreads 8 and under....

13-9 with those 3 double digit spread games (Pitt, arizona, raiders)

So its official no more double digit spreads as its not profitable in the long run..

so a 22 game sample size is the long run LMAO dumbfucks at covers
quote
AFNfootballnerd send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
AFNfootballnerd
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 913
Location:
#321
Posted: 12/12/2012 3:48:06 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by austintx11:

13-6 overall for low spreads 8 and under....

13-9 with those 3 double digit spread games (Pitt, arizona, raiders)

So its official no more double digit spreads as its not profitable in the long run..

so a 22 game sample size is the long run LMAO dumbfucks at covers


not sure what your referring to but 22 games has been a decent run so far?
quote
iBETnWIN
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
iBETnWIN
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2101
Location: United States
#322
Posted: 12/12/2012 3:54:44 AM
Wild. Take it easy. Why are you getting upset for? There's no reason for that. This guy Jonah Hill is pretty much including the forums in a beta-testing of his program.

The majority finds it at least interesting. No one is holding a gun to anyone's head and forcing them to wager on what the program says. It's just another factor you should take into consideration.

It's, frankly, too early to base any conclusions off the validity of the program. He's simply providing data that he has. Eventually, they'll be sufficient power to make a decision on what it could be used for.

Stay positive! It's good for the bank roll...
quote
AFNfootballnerd send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
AFNfootballnerd
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 913
Location:
#323
Posted: 12/12/2012 4:07:02 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by iBETnWIN:

Wild. Take it easy. Why are you getting upset for? There's no reason for that. This guy Jonah Hill is pretty much including the forums in a beta-testing of his program.

The majority finds it at least interesting. No one is holding a gun to anyone's head and forcing them to wager on what the program says. It's just another factor you should take into consideration.

It's, frankly, too early to base any conclusions off the validity of the program. He's simply providing data that he has. Eventually, they'll be sufficient power to make a decision on what it could be used for.

Stay positive! It's good for the bank roll...


Not trying to be a tout or covering up my loses as touts do..Its been confusing with my human element and double digit spread picks...i guess its the degenerate and me being human with my bias pick on Texans....I am  testing this program to see if it is profitble with money management and boy have i learned alot so far.....The program is 14-6 if ive strictly stuck with the program...

If the program continues to be profitable till the end of the season then this program has promise....
quote
EricAnderson
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
EricAnderson
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 211
Location:
#324
Posted: 12/12/2012 4:29:52 AM
Patriots are winning the Super Bowl bro. As long as its not giants vs patriots again. Giants = patriots kryptonite
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
BigUnit
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
BigUnit
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 17095
Location: Nevada
#325
Posted: 12/12/2012 8:30:24 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:


Yes I did...have a confession...and absolutely will not do it again! I had better numbers for NE but my bias got in the way and I altered the numbers to make it look better for Texans because I wanted Brady and patriots to lose...buddy of mine got into it about patriots will win the Super Bowl and I took it personal and tried to fade him  will not let bias do that again apoligizes to whoever tailed MNF 

quote
Forum Index : NFL Betting : Messages Page 13 of 28 «  11 12 13 14 15   »
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.