I am taking the Lions +9, however risky it may be. We'll be without a few players for off season stupidity, but it'll be a pivotal jump start for the Lions. Not to mention, it'll be at Ford Field. Coming from someone who went to almost every home game last year, including Monday Night Football, it will make a difference.
Away game at SF during Week 2, however......
I am taking the Lions +9, however risky it may be. We'll be without a few players for off season stupidity, but it'll be a pivotal jump start for the Lions. Not to mention, it'll be at Ford Field. Coming from someone who went to almost every home game last year, including Monday Night Football, it will make a difference.
Away game at SF during Week 2, however......
New Orleans +1 Houston +3.5 and Chi +0.5 Sounds great
New England terrible on Defense. I know they are winning machines just not comfortable with them until I see they have approved on Defense.
New Orleans +1 Houston +3.5 and Chi +0.5 Sounds great
New England terrible on Defense. I know they are winning machines just not comfortable with them until I see they have approved on Defense.
Totally disagree with your Rams pick. In Detroit? Lions have proved that they can SCORE. Rams wont even put up 21. Lions will definately win game 1 and more than likely will cover that DD spread fairly easily.
Totally disagree with your Rams pick. In Detroit? Lions have proved that they can SCORE. Rams wont even put up 21. Lions will definately win game 1 and more than likely will cover that DD spread fairly easily.
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
"If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy?
That means the players not playing are not worth a line change."
I meant that lines won't change significantly if the key player is active. For instance, when Lynch's suspension is handed down, I expect the Seahawks to become at least a 3 point dog. Those who prematurely bet Seattle in their opener or OVER in season wins total will probably wish they hadn't.
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
"If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy?
That means the players not playing are not worth a line change."
I meant that lines won't change significantly if the key player is active. For instance, when Lynch's suspension is handed down, I expect the Seahawks to become at least a 3 point dog. Those who prematurely bet Seattle in their opener or OVER in season wins total will probably wish they hadn't.
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
"If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy?
That means the players not playing are not worth a line change."
I meant that lines won't change significantly if the key player is active. For instance, when Lynch's suspension is handed down, I expect the Seahawks to become at least a 3 point dog. Those who prematurely bet Seattle in their opener or OVER in season wins total will probably wish they hadn't.
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy? That means the players not playing are not worth a line change. |
"If lines don't change then why does it even matter who's healthy?
That means the players not playing are not worth a line change."
I meant that lines won't change significantly if the key player is active. For instance, when Lynch's suspension is handed down, I expect the Seahawks to become at least a 3 point dog. Those who prematurely bet Seattle in their opener or OVER in season wins total will probably wish they hadn't.
You are wrong. Week 1 lines change a lot, look at last year.
There's always two sides, what about all those who bet UNDER on season wins???
Take a game early depends which side you like and you can't predict line movement. Lynch is not worth many points anyway.
They will change very little before preseason in august as I stated. At least while in training camp, players have a shorter leash where they can't get in as much trouble. Some of you just have to get money down in June/July because that "sure" thing is available.
Take a game early and you're at the risk of being shafted by an irresponsible player. There are many who would disagree with your assessment of Lynch's value. He appears to be the focal point of the Hawks offense.
You are wrong. Week 1 lines change a lot, look at last year.
There's always two sides, what about all those who bet UNDER on season wins???
Take a game early depends which side you like and you can't predict line movement. Lynch is not worth many points anyway.
They will change very little before preseason in august as I stated. At least while in training camp, players have a shorter leash where they can't get in as much trouble. Some of you just have to get money down in June/July because that "sure" thing is available.
Take a game early and you're at the risk of being shafted by an irresponsible player. There are many who would disagree with your assessment of Lynch's value. He appears to be the focal point of the Hawks offense.
I totally agree with you , going ot be a blow out.
I am putting a 1k parlay on eagles and bears to cover for week one. It is going to pay 3,862. ÉASY MONEY!!!!! What everyone think?
I totally agree with you , going ot be a blow out.
I am putting a 1k parlay on eagles and bears to cover for week one. It is going to pay 3,862. ÉASY MONEY!!!!! What everyone think?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.