That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
what michaelino985 is saying is absolutely correct, dummy. The key word is COVERED both games. So going by this trend, indy should win and COVER.
That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
what michaelino985 is saying is absolutely correct, dummy. The key word is COVERED both games. So going by this trend, indy should win and COVER.
the 32-3 is bullshit. I just looked up 2 seasons (01 & 02) and found 3 revenge losses immediately (To Pats, Tenny & Miami). Not checking his other 9 completed seasons when I know there'll be more revenge losses in them.
the 32-3 is bullshit. I just looked up 2 seasons (01 & 02) and found 3 revenge losses immediately (To Pats, Tenny & Miami). Not checking his other 9 completed seasons when I know there'll be more revenge losses in them.
That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
That trend is absolutely ridiculous because the Colts have won every damn game except for the one played this year. I could easily manipulate your trend to say:
Indianapolis always failed to cover at least one game in the season series against Houston since 2004.
See how I did that?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.