while i may think that stl is due for a cover, the thought that they are worth a whole bankroll bet is as ridiculous as ppl who bet on the lions last week
this week nothing is worth that much bro, not at all
worst card of the year....wait til next week and ill give u a better answer
0
Quote Originally Posted by iizontheprize:
STl it is a good situational game..
while i may think that stl is due for a cover, the thought that they are worth a whole bankroll bet is as ridiculous as ppl who bet on the lions last week
this week nothing is worth that much bro, not at all
worst card of the year....wait til next week and ill give u a better answer
while i may think that stl is due for a cover, the thought that they are worth a whole bankroll bet is as ridiculous as ppl who bet on the lions last week
this week nothing is worth that much bro, not at all
worst card of the year....wait til next week and ill give u a better answer
As I agree with you here Youngone,he did say if you had to this sunday..
0
Quote Originally Posted by YoungOne:
while i may think that stl is due for a cover, the thought that they are worth a whole bankroll bet is as ridiculous as ppl who bet on the lions last week
this week nothing is worth that much bro, not at all
worst card of the year....wait til next week and ill give u a better answer
As I agree with you here Youngone,he did say if you had to this sunday..
RIGHT, even if stl covers, you cant make the play of the week on a team that has shown no signs of life at all so far. if u like the rams and wanna put $100 on them, go ahead. but as the play of the week, come on man, eitehr take the az over or just wait til next week.
again......THIS CARD SUCKS!
0
RIGHT, even if stl covers, you cant make the play of the week on a team that has shown no signs of life at all so far. if u like the rams and wanna put $100 on them, go ahead. but as the play of the week, come on man, eitehr take the az over or just wait til next week.
GOT to give Chagers their revenge play this week I would bet a larger % of MY bankroll on this game BUT never all of it unless i had system play in hand that i knew was 100% foolproof
LIKE fading Bengals and radiers two weeks ago both fell into 100% system play against plays I hammered both for $1000 each and thought for sure that Chagers were going down but system held raiders did it again played not to lose in 2nd half only score a FG Cahgers ran amok in 4th qtrt put up 25 pints won by 10 points !
that ws half of my account only those two games BET
Interesting theory on the Pats...............BUT they stayed on the West Coast.
0
Quote Originally Posted by butcher134:
have to go against team making second trip west
PATRIOTS 6000 miles traveled
GOT to give Chagers their revenge play this week I would bet a larger % of MY bankroll on this game BUT never all of it unless i had system play in hand that i knew was 100% foolproof
LIKE fading Bengals and radiers two weeks ago both fell into 100% system play against plays I hammered both for $1000 each and thought for sure that Chagers were going down but system held raiders did it again played not to lose in 2nd half only score a FG Cahgers ran amok in 4th qtrt put up 25 pints won by 10 points !
that ws half of my account only those two games BET
Interesting theory on the Pats...............BUT they stayed on the West Coast.
while i may think that stl is due for a cover, the thought that they are worth a whole bankroll bet is as ridiculous as ppl who bet on the lions last week
this week nothing is worth that much bro, not at all
worst card of the year....wait til next week and ill give u a better answer
that was me thanks for the reminder
0
Quote Originally Posted by YoungOne:
while i may think that stl is due for a cover, the thought that they are worth a whole bankroll bet is as ridiculous as ppl who bet on the lions last week
this week nothing is worth that much bro, not at all
worst card of the year....wait til next week and ill give u a better answer
If you had to put your whole bankroll on a game this sunday/monday.......what would you put it on and why?
With a gun to my head to bet all my money on one game, I would wrestle the gun away, pistol whip the other person, then force that person to give me their entire bankroll at gunpoint -- while verbally abusing them. We should all be that strong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SBlazinX69:
If you had to put your whole bankroll on a game this sunday/monday.......what would you put it on and why?
With a gun to my head to bet all my money on one game, I would wrestle the gun away, pistol whip the other person, then force that person to give me their entire bankroll at gunpoint -- while verbally abusing them. We should all be that strong.
Well, this is a silly thread but if I had to do it. My entire life savings and retirement - I guess I would lay -700 on the moneyline with the Redskins. Now that's just crazy but it would be my play.
0
Well, this is a silly thread but if I had to do it. My entire life savings and retirement - I guess I would lay -700 on the moneyline with the Redskins. Now that's just crazy but it would be my play.
The Giants. Everyon one this board is talking about how the Giants haven't played anyone so far and that Cleveland is going to come outy a give them the game of their life.
Not sure if anyone has noticed but Cleveland sucks. No running game, the quarterback is not that good despite the year he had last year and he's showing it. The secondarty is non existent, the Defensive line is pathetic. So far their wide recievers are a joke. Stallworth hasn't played yet, Edwards is dropping passes they way he did in year one and two, which allows the defense to double cover Winslow all day.
Last week everyone was on Detroit because they were "due" to win. This week everyone is against the Gianst because they are "due" to lose.
I'll take the Giants, the superbowl team that is playing once on Monday night against Cleveland, who didn't even make the playoffs and are on Monday night 3 times this year. Seems to me that is more then enough motivation for the 4-0 Superbowl champs agains the 1-3 Brownies.
0
The Giants. Everyon one this board is talking about how the Giants haven't played anyone so far and that Cleveland is going to come outy a give them the game of their life.
Not sure if anyone has noticed but Cleveland sucks. No running game, the quarterback is not that good despite the year he had last year and he's showing it. The secondarty is non existent, the Defensive line is pathetic. So far their wide recievers are a joke. Stallworth hasn't played yet, Edwards is dropping passes they way he did in year one and two, which allows the defense to double cover Winslow all day.
Last week everyone was on Detroit because they were "due" to win. This week everyone is against the Gianst because they are "due" to lose.
I'll take the Giants, the superbowl team that is playing once on Monday night against Cleveland, who didn't even make the playoffs and are on Monday night 3 times this year. Seems to me that is more then enough motivation for the 4-0 Superbowl champs agains the 1-3 Brownies.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.