Sure, might be a fluke, but for some reason im tied for 1st in the playoffs contest, hehe.
Anyways, take the Pack -7, and Chargers, Patriots havent covered since beating pitsburgh, and have only covered 1 in last 7 games. The line came out because of the injuries of LT and PR. I thought the colts would win, but not cover, and same in this game. It should also be snowy and cold, and pats only have a passing game, Chargers showed the colts passing game some D and won outright.
TAKE +14 and UNDER 49
30-17 Final Score
--------------------------------------
Wow, the packers, after watching that game, should have been 42-6... Those two TD's by the seahawks were handed to them by ryan grant, without those, seattle was up 14-0... You know the rest... GB defense is awesome and their offense is just as good.
NO WAY NY covers this game... I had NY last week, simply because Dallas was rusty and TO iffy.
Just my thoughts... good luck all.
GB -7 and OVER 42
35-13 Final Score
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Sure, might be a fluke, but for some reason im tied for 1st in the playoffs contest, hehe.
Anyways, take the Pack -7, and Chargers, Patriots havent covered since beating pitsburgh, and have only covered 1 in last 7 games. The line came out because of the injuries of LT and PR. I thought the colts would win, but not cover, and same in this game. It should also be snowy and cold, and pats only have a passing game, Chargers showed the colts passing game some D and won outright.
TAKE +14 and UNDER 49
30-17 Final Score
--------------------------------------
Wow, the packers, after watching that game, should have been 42-6... Those two TD's by the seahawks were handed to them by ryan grant, without those, seattle was up 14-0... You know the rest... GB defense is awesome and their offense is just as good.
NO WAY NY covers this game... I had NY last week, simply because Dallas was rusty and TO iffy.
Just my thoughts... good luck all.
GB -7 and OVER 42
35-13 Final Score
One more detail, Chargers have covered 8 straight games... 8 straight covers, vs 4 straight losses covers with the patriots.
Id go with that trend anyday.
0
One more detail, Chargers have covered 8 straight games... 8 straight covers, vs 4 straight losses covers with the patriots.
Id go with that trend anyday.
Brava: Awesome playoff record. Congrats! Leaning
the same way with Green Bay and San Diego although
it wouldn't surprise me if New England covers this
week. Both totals are dropping fast. Do you still like the N.E./S.D. under?
0
Brava: Awesome playoff record. Congrats! Leaning
the same way with Green Bay and San Diego although
it wouldn't surprise me if New England covers this
week. Both totals are dropping fast. Do you still like the N.E./S.D. under?
Considering they held the COLTS to 24 points and managed to score 28 with their injuries. I kinda see a low scoring game this time. Especially with the weather. Just like that game vs the JETS (20-10). Chargers defense is working, offense is iffy. So they might well lose, but not by 14...
Thats my view.
0
Considering they held the COLTS to 24 points and managed to score 28 with their injuries. I kinda see a low scoring game this time. Especially with the weather. Just like that game vs the JETS (20-10). Chargers defense is working, offense is iffy. So they might well lose, but not by 14...
Thats my view.
Your predicted score will hit the OVER 46.5. San Diego's defense did NOT play well in my opinion against the Colts. Indy let them off the hook. They were moving the ball with ease on the Chargers. I think NE will execute much better, and score into the 30's. I am not positive NE will cover the spread because I dont trust NE defense, especially after giving up 22 first downs to the Jags. But the Pats SHOULD have covered that spread.
Like the GB alot. They are very good...
GL
0
Your predicted score will hit the OVER 46.5. San Diego's defense did NOT play well in my opinion against the Colts. Indy let them off the hook. They were moving the ball with ease on the Chargers. I think NE will execute much better, and score into the 30's. I am not positive NE will cover the spread because I dont trust NE defense, especially after giving up 22 first downs to the Jags. But the Pats SHOULD have covered that spread.
Like the GB alot. They are very good...
GL
Well I have 49 and Under... Hope it hits, all I have to risk is losing the prize on wagerlines NFL contest, lol.
$500 would be nice, the audio system doesnt sound convincing.
0
Well I have 49 and Under... Hope it hits, all I have to risk is losing the prize on wagerlines NFL contest, lol.
$500 would be nice, the audio system doesnt sound convincing.
tdjets you rite i had jaggs but ne shouldve cover cant blame ne defence 3 key plays 1-missed field goal 2-drop pass on 15 yard line wide open 3-the defence face mask 15yder witch gave jaggs a score dont think this shit gonna happen again colts gave sd the game period ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
tdjets you rite i had jaggs but ne shouldve cover cant blame ne defence 3 key plays 1-missed field goal 2-drop pass on 15 yard line wide open 3-the defence face mask 15yder witch gave jaggs a score dont think this shit gonna happen again colts gave sd the game period ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
From all the reports so far, the wind will be a big factor by game time. If that's the case, it's definitely going under and could be close to that N.E./JETS score. (20-10)
0
From all the reports so far, the wind will be a big factor by game time. If that's the case, it's definitely going under and could be close to that N.E./JETS score. (20-10)
From all the reports so far, the wind is going to be a big factor by game time. If that's the case, it's definitely going under and we could see a scorelike the N.E./JETS game. (20-10)
0
From all the reports so far, the wind is going to be a big factor by game time. If that's the case, it's definitely going under and we could see a scorelike the N.E./JETS game. (20-10)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.