Bum,
It may be Al Sharpton on one hand (not your, quote unquote, Robert Redford of good looks) but on the other, it is the most beautiful avatar in the world to me. And it will give me a hell of a good laugh until Cinco De Mayo.
BWS - United Negro College Fund donation
GimmeeMoney - Al Sharpton avatar
And now we must finish off the three amigos with Hugh Jorgan.
What's in store for him? He'll have his day in the sun. This I promise every member here. Every single one!
Bum,
It may be Al Sharpton on one hand (not your, quote unquote, Robert Redford of good looks) but on the other, it is the most beautiful avatar in the world to me. And it will give me a hell of a good laugh until Cinco De Mayo.
BWS - United Negro College Fund donation
GimmeeMoney - Al Sharpton avatar
And now we must finish off the three amigos with Hugh Jorgan.
What's in store for him? He'll have his day in the sun. This I promise every member here. Every single one!
Of course it did BB. Just like Gobert going down helped the Jazz steal game 1.
I don't want to take away from what the Jazz did right in this game because they played as good as you could have to come away with a win. I was incredibly impressed, shocked actually, at the end of the first quarter.
But how often are you going to get what is in the top 5 of the best first quarters in playoff history with Hayward's 21 points?
How often does that happen? 1 in 500 first quarters for him? 1 in 1,000?
You can't depend on that as a Jazz backer but you got all if it to open that game.
And even at that, they still lost. So ya take what you get with all-world performances as a Jazz backer and you take the rallying point from Griffin's injury and just smile if you are a Clippers backer and a win to the win column.
And I am very worried for that parlay as you noted because of Rondo's injury obviously. They could have lost last night by 40. If you have any spare bankroll, it's time to work your magic.
Of course it did BB. Just like Gobert going down helped the Jazz steal game 1.
I don't want to take away from what the Jazz did right in this game because they played as good as you could have to come away with a win. I was incredibly impressed, shocked actually, at the end of the first quarter.
But how often are you going to get what is in the top 5 of the best first quarters in playoff history with Hayward's 21 points?
How often does that happen? 1 in 500 first quarters for him? 1 in 1,000?
You can't depend on that as a Jazz backer but you got all if it to open that game.
And even at that, they still lost. So ya take what you get with all-world performances as a Jazz backer and you take the rallying point from Griffin's injury and just smile if you are a Clippers backer and a win to the win column.
And I am very worried for that parlay as you noted because of Rondo's injury obviously. They could have lost last night by 40. If you have any spare bankroll, it's time to work your magic.
Well I was within the spread for 47 and a half minutes in the Kings Lakers game and lost that one and no one gave me a gold star for it.
So I'll take this one. Simple as that.
Well I was within the spread for 47 and a half minutes in the Kings Lakers game and lost that one and no one gave me a gold star for it.
So I'll take this one. Simple as that.
Silent observer.... And Ante too.
We will make money together.
Silent observer.... And Ante too.
We will make money together.
Pendi Juice funky dumped david venez cold
22-25. We are inching closer to chance. And then we'll move forward like a bullet train run with nitrous oxide.
Pendi Juice funky dumped david venez cold
22-25. We are inching closer to chance. And then we'll move forward like a bullet train run with nitrous oxide.
And this is why you have to always worry about series bets, particularly parlays.
At the end of the season, these guys are on their last legs.
Last year, Whiteside going down was the difference between winning and losing my Heat series bet last year. Griffin is a big loss but there are still pieces here to win you this series. It's crazy I have to say this but you need Austin Rivers back as an addition to help you win it.
And this is why you have to always worry about series bets, particularly parlays.
At the end of the season, these guys are on their last legs.
Last year, Whiteside going down was the difference between winning and losing my Heat series bet last year. Griffin is a big loss but there are still pieces here to win you this series. It's crazy I have to say this but you need Austin Rivers back as an addition to help you win it.
It doesn't matter how much of a game you are behind. The game is played 48 mins as we saw with cavs/indy yesterday.
If you are on the winning side, it was the right pick. Clippers was the right pick in this one. Utah already stole one in LA they aren't going to give a stranglehold on the series by giving up this much needed game. Now they got home court advantage back!
I think LA wins this series. Utah would be too boring to watch in the next round.
Thanks.
I think you have to reread what you wrote above. Those are two contradictory statements.
The right side is not always the winning side.
And a simple comparison comes from poker.
Fish who suck out with 7/2 off-suit did not have the right hand because they had the winning hand.
In many ways, the NBA is similar. These games play out like flops, turns and rivers and each street has to be analyzed in accordance with the betting therein.
If you had the Pacers up 26 and leading almost the entire game, even though the Cavs won by 5 after a melt-down, the Pacers were more of the right side. Why? You have to wait more than a almost THREE QUARTERS OF A CENTURY for 26 point comebacks to happen in the playoffs (the last being a 25 pt comeback in 1948). The wheels just came off to end the game. That's all. But in the long-run, if you make plays like the Pacers in Game 3, you will be a profitable gambler far more than the one who collected the cash ONCE time with the Cavs.
It doesn't matter how much of a game you are behind. The game is played 48 mins as we saw with cavs/indy yesterday.
If you are on the winning side, it was the right pick. Clippers was the right pick in this one. Utah already stole one in LA they aren't going to give a stranglehold on the series by giving up this much needed game. Now they got home court advantage back!
I think LA wins this series. Utah would be too boring to watch in the next round.
Thanks.
I think you have to reread what you wrote above. Those are two contradictory statements.
The right side is not always the winning side.
And a simple comparison comes from poker.
Fish who suck out with 7/2 off-suit did not have the right hand because they had the winning hand.
In many ways, the NBA is similar. These games play out like flops, turns and rivers and each street has to be analyzed in accordance with the betting therein.
If you had the Pacers up 26 and leading almost the entire game, even though the Cavs won by 5 after a melt-down, the Pacers were more of the right side. Why? You have to wait more than a almost THREE QUARTERS OF A CENTURY for 26 point comebacks to happen in the playoffs (the last being a 25 pt comeback in 1948). The wheels just came off to end the game. That's all. But in the long-run, if you make plays like the Pacers in Game 3, you will be a profitable gambler far more than the one who collected the cash ONCE time with the Cavs.
That kinda went over my head. What is the difference between a good bet and the right side?
Do you mean value bet? Cavs were a huge value bet at the half. The ML Was also definitely worth it. I think the ML was a great bet, paid and was a lock to win. So in that case, I don't see Indy FG as a good bet. This is the playoffs, so a lot of capping goes out the window and predicting the script is the best way. Just imagine how much people could have made, if they predicted CLE would still win the game at the half.
I made my theory why cavs might sweep Indy before the game, I have picked Cavs ML in every game so far. I said the reason they won't let Indy win the first 3 games, is because Cavs are such a lock in this series, they don't want anyone getting a better price on the series.
But now that the series is all but done, they surely may allow Indy to win game 4, because that won't affect the price much now. IT's basaically unbeatable now, unless you are rich.
I actually lean Indy game 4 because the perception has changed that this will be a sweep to the public. Indy up 25+ and still couldn't win. But I think Indy will win game 4 to be honest. So I don't see a sweep now I see a 4-1 series win for the cavs.
A good bet ideally is a game that plays out like you capped it. Not exactly but on many of your points. If you get moosed by a basket at the buzzer you grin and bear it. You weren't wrong but you collect nothing.
So, for example, I've struggled this year. But a nice chunk of the bets in that record only lost by a single point, a moose at the buzzer or because of an injury (The Bills season win total being the worst of the worst).
And because of that I know I'm still the same capper just hitting a rough patch with games that simply don't go my way because of bad luck. The games I'm winning are not really all that close or contested wins for the most part. This Clippers win was unusual. They were getting their as* handed to them, rallied around an injury, but the Jazz also got a deity-like performance from Gobert which simply can't be capped. I wouldn't really know how to classify this win, good or bad given that.
But the luck will even out, also come your way and then the good capping will come to the surface.
The trolls here won't agree, but you can have a great cap and still lose.
And you can have a horrendous cap and still win.
There's a huge capping graveyard on this site.
In fact, the site used to have a graveyard as an avatar when you were banned.
Anyone remember that!?
If you had the Cavs full game in Game 3, that was a terrible cap. But you won money. But if you don't understand why you won, and make adjustments to avoid such caps, you will lose in the long-run.
And then disappear completely. Like most cappers here!
That kinda went over my head. What is the difference between a good bet and the right side?
Do you mean value bet? Cavs were a huge value bet at the half. The ML Was also definitely worth it. I think the ML was a great bet, paid and was a lock to win. So in that case, I don't see Indy FG as a good bet. This is the playoffs, so a lot of capping goes out the window and predicting the script is the best way. Just imagine how much people could have made, if they predicted CLE would still win the game at the half.
I made my theory why cavs might sweep Indy before the game, I have picked Cavs ML in every game so far. I said the reason they won't let Indy win the first 3 games, is because Cavs are such a lock in this series, they don't want anyone getting a better price on the series.
But now that the series is all but done, they surely may allow Indy to win game 4, because that won't affect the price much now. IT's basaically unbeatable now, unless you are rich.
I actually lean Indy game 4 because the perception has changed that this will be a sweep to the public. Indy up 25+ and still couldn't win. But I think Indy will win game 4 to be honest. So I don't see a sweep now I see a 4-1 series win for the cavs.
A good bet ideally is a game that plays out like you capped it. Not exactly but on many of your points. If you get moosed by a basket at the buzzer you grin and bear it. You weren't wrong but you collect nothing.
So, for example, I've struggled this year. But a nice chunk of the bets in that record only lost by a single point, a moose at the buzzer or because of an injury (The Bills season win total being the worst of the worst).
And because of that I know I'm still the same capper just hitting a rough patch with games that simply don't go my way because of bad luck. The games I'm winning are not really all that close or contested wins for the most part. This Clippers win was unusual. They were getting their as* handed to them, rallied around an injury, but the Jazz also got a deity-like performance from Gobert which simply can't be capped. I wouldn't really know how to classify this win, good or bad given that.
But the luck will even out, also come your way and then the good capping will come to the surface.
The trolls here won't agree, but you can have a great cap and still lose.
And you can have a horrendous cap and still win.
There's a huge capping graveyard on this site.
In fact, the site used to have a graveyard as an avatar when you were banned.
Anyone remember that!?
If you had the Cavs full game in Game 3, that was a terrible cap. But you won money. But if you don't understand why you won, and make adjustments to avoid such caps, you will lose in the long-run.
And then disappear completely. Like most cappers here!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.