I believe the number that most books use is 33%.
Fair enough, but when the play was refused it was 13 and 41.5, which equals a little over 31%.
Fair enough, but when the play was refused it was 13 and 41.5, which equals a little over 31%.
Fair enough, but when the play was refused it was 13 and 41.5, which equals a little over 31%.
I'm not going to argue with you guys, so this is my last post on this topic. They would accept any combination on this game, EXCEPT Atlanta and OV. They would allow JAX/UN, JAX/OV, or ATL/UN, just not ATL/OV.
I'm not going to argue with you guys, so this is my last post on this topic. They would accept any combination on this game, EXCEPT Atlanta and OV. They would allow JAX/UN, JAX/OV, or ATL/UN, just not ATL/OV.
I don't think that is entirely true.....single bets maybe, but parlays we are talking about here...how not accepting parlays be rewarding? You don't lose taking parlays if you base this on quarterly. There's gotta be more to it.
Although the thread could be positive...I am being negative and I am trying to figure out why. Thanks for the clarification.
I don't think that is entirely true.....single bets maybe, but parlays we are talking about here...how not accepting parlays be rewarding? You don't lose taking parlays if you base this on quarterly. There's gotta be more to it.
Although the thread could be positive...I am being negative and I am trying to figure out why. Thanks for the clarification.
Just risk more on a single play either the Ov or side which you wanted originally and get the same win amount from(parlay) if you felt that confident of it hitting anyhow.....
Just risk more on a single play either the Ov or side which you wanted originally and get the same win amount from(parlay) if you felt that confident of it hitting anyhow.....
Thanks to you guys who understood what I was trying to share with everyone and posted supportive comments. I hope you cashed in just like I did.
For the record, the fact that books weren't accepting that combination in a parlay didn't keep me from using the info to hit the side and the total straight up, along with 2 teasers (ATL/OV & ATL/UN). I understand what correlated parlays are and why they are sometimes refused by books, but as I attempted to explain, that wasn't the reason this play was refused. It was refused because of the amount of sharp money that had been taken in on ATL by the books. I don't mean to sound rude, but I really don't know how to say this and not sound that way......if you don't understand what I'm trying to say then you don't understand the way books work and how they control their exposure on certain plays. I don't have any interest in debating anyone on here about this topic or any other so I'm not going to go back and forth with people about it. The people who understood what the info I was sharing meant and appreciated it. That's all I really care about.
Thanks to you guys who understood what I was trying to share with everyone and posted supportive comments. I hope you cashed in just like I did.
For the record, the fact that books weren't accepting that combination in a parlay didn't keep me from using the info to hit the side and the total straight up, along with 2 teasers (ATL/OV & ATL/UN). I understand what correlated parlays are and why they are sometimes refused by books, but as I attempted to explain, that wasn't the reason this play was refused. It was refused because of the amount of sharp money that had been taken in on ATL by the books. I don't mean to sound rude, but I really don't know how to say this and not sound that way......if you don't understand what I'm trying to say then you don't understand the way books work and how they control their exposure on certain plays. I don't have any interest in debating anyone on here about this topic or any other so I'm not going to go back and forth with people about it. The people who understood what the info I was sharing meant and appreciated it. That's all I really care about.
It's a good angle to play and also it seems when there is extra juice on a play that should not be there, it's a hint too.
It's a good angle to play and also it seems when there is extra juice on a play that should not be there, it's a hint too.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.