Messages

Forum Index : College Basketball : Messages Page 3 of 3  1 2 3  
Author: [College Basketball] Topic: no flagrant call on boynton?????
dustyent send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
dustyent
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 182
Location: Wisconsin
#51
Posted: 3/23/2012 2:08:14 AM
yeah. you guys are right. you guys totally made the right call on marquette. down 6 with a minute 15 left. and boyton swung his arm to protect the rebound and almost hit the marquette player which would have resulted in 2 shots for marquette and 2 shot for florida, had he connected,  with marquette getting the ball out of bounds afterwards. you guys got so screwed. you made the right call, just got screwed by the refs, who were out to get you.
quote
iceman67
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
iceman67
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2318
Location: United States
#52
Posted: 3/23/2012 2:08:16 AM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by victornewman:

Teddy just wants to be the center of attention. What a POS!

"TV Teddy V"

quote
FrankT55 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Station |
FrankT55
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 752
Location: Nevada
#53
Posted: 3/23/2012 2:16:16 AM
Thats the only way you could of won this game, Marquette got out played in all areas of this game you needed some bs flagrent call, what happened to Crowder shut shut shut down.  Come on, just say you made a bad bet were on the wrong side for sure, doubled up on the sucker 2nd half line and lost, you will get it back tomorrow.
quote
LockBurger send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
LockBurger
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1121
Location: Massachusetts
#54
Posted: 3/23/2012 2:26:31 AM
i don't understand how stupid some people are. myself and that dude hot route openly stated, multiple times, that the call would not change this game at all. i was on marquette small, and have no problem admitting i was 100% wrong on this game from start to finish. I just think that the flagrant rules are retarded, inconsistent, and improperly called. can't really argue with dusty if he thinks that there was no contact at all on that play unless you were watching on a 4" tv it was pretty obvious contact was made...


quote
dustyent send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
dustyent
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 182
Location: Wisconsin
#55
Posted: 3/23/2012 3:39:33 AM
this is so controversial on this thread, but, you can't find a video on youtube or even a highlight on espn that replays such a "controversial call". it's in your head guys. The call didn't jump out at me, maybe because i was on florida, but i just want to see a replay because i'm pretty sure that he didn't connect with an elbow to the head, which is what the rule, that you guys so adamantly claim happened, says is a flagarant 1. i don't have a 4" tv, actually watched the game in hd on 55 tv. can anybody provide a link to the replay of the elbow to the head? thank you.
quote
dustyent send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
dustyent
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 182
Location: Wisconsin
#56
Posted: 3/23/2012 4:21:04 AM
ok. just saw the replay. and since you guys are trying to take this rule to the letter of the law, boykin did hit him with his forearm to the face, it was about 3 inches below boykin's elbow which you guys claim would have been a flagarant 1 (which reads elbow to the head). i will give you that it was close to an elbow to the head but it was definitely about 3 inches below his elbow, so therefore the right call was made. There is no flagrant call for a forearm to the head.
quote
Forum Index : College Basketball : Messages Page 3 of 3  1 2 3  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.