Stats don't mean garbage when ur in a division with anemic offenses the likes of Arizona and St. Louis. darn if the saints played those garbage teams twice a year each they'd have a top 5 d
Does containing QB's like Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers mean anything to you? Just curious.....
Stats don't mean garbage when ur in a division with anemic offenses the likes of Arizona and St. Louis. darn if the saints played those garbage teams twice a year each they'd have a top 5 d
Does containing QB's like Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers mean anything to you? Just curious.....
Yea sf won but they blew a 31-3 lead in the 2nd hslf and got a lucky td off a punt return to win 38-31. They're d is soft as garbage
you have to understand, the reason why niners blew a 31-3 lead is justin smith got injured. also when they were in the lead niners rushed only 3 knowing that brady was going to throw on everydown. brady with time is dangerous, but for you to say niners D is soft? you must have lost a lot of money and been drunkk to say that.
Yea sf won but they blew a 31-3 lead in the 2nd hslf and got a lucky td off a punt return to win 38-31. They're d is soft as garbage
you have to understand, the reason why niners blew a 31-3 lead is justin smith got injured. also when they were in the lead niners rushed only 3 knowing that brady was going to throw on everydown. brady with time is dangerous, but for you to say niners D is soft? you must have lost a lot of money and been drunkk to say that.
Stats don't mean garbage when ur in a division with anemic offenses the likes of Arizona and St. Louis. darn if the saints played those garbage teams twice a year each they'd have a top 5 d
Stats don't mean garbage when ur in a division with anemic offenses the likes of Arizona and St. Louis. darn if the saints played those garbage teams twice a year each they'd have a top 5 d
Yea sf won but they blew a 31-3 lead in the 2nd hslf and got a lucky td off a punt return to win 38-31. They're d is soft as garbage
What's that have to do with anything, the 49ers still won the game, that's what is important.
Your completely dismissing the 49ers blew the Pats away building a 31-3 lead, and when the Pats came-back you seem to be suggesting that come-back somehow is more important then the fact the 49ers blew-the Pats away 31-3.
It's not and never will be because when push came-to-shove it was the 49ers who took over the game and won it, not the Pats...........................................................
Yea sf won but they blew a 31-3 lead in the 2nd hslf and got a lucky td off a punt return to win 38-31. They're d is soft as garbage
What's that have to do with anything, the 49ers still won the game, that's what is important.
Your completely dismissing the 49ers blew the Pats away building a 31-3 lead, and when the Pats came-back you seem to be suggesting that come-back somehow is more important then the fact the 49ers blew-the Pats away 31-3.
It's not and never will be because when push came-to-shove it was the 49ers who took over the game and won it, not the Pats...........................................................
People saying sf has soft d sound stupid. Niners d is one of the most physical and aggressive defenses in the league. Yes they almost let the pats come back 2nd half but for the most part they wrre in prevent d just trying to stop the big play and brady was tearing yhem up with short passes. In the endtniners got the w anyway... in new england... in a primetime game.
People saying sf has soft d sound stupid. Niners d is one of the most physical and aggressive defenses in the league. Yes they almost let the pats come back 2nd half but for the most part they wrre in prevent d just trying to stop the big play and brady was tearing yhem up with short passes. In the endtniners got the w anyway... in new england... in a primetime game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.