| Author: |
[College Football] Topic: *** Season Long Challenge Week 6 *** |
|
tiasman |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2977
Location: |
#51 Posted: 10/4/2012 5:42:29 PM Tideman, I hope they prove me wrong! |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
badlands |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 40112
Location: Rhode Island |
#52 Posted: 10/4/2012 5:46:34 PM 10. n. carolina -3.5 9. utah +138. texas -7 7. florida +3 6. purdue +3 5. maryland -4 4 penn state -2.5 3. oklahoma -4 2. south carolina -2.5 1. nebraska +5 |
|
quote |
|
-29- |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2878
Location: Virginia |
#53 Posted: 10/4/2012 7:27:08 PM 10- South Carolina
9- North Carolina
8- Louisiana State
7- Northwestern
6- Syracuse
5- West Virginia
4- Maryland
3- Texas Tech
2- Nebraska
1- Utah |
|
quote |
|
Vegasbuster |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1926
Location: Louisiana |
#54 Posted: 10/5/2012 4:15:25 PM
10. USC (taking loss) 9. LSU 8. Ohio St 7. VT 6. WVU 5. Georgia 4. UCLA 3. Michigan 2. Texas Tech 1. USF |
|
quote |
|
Boom_Boom |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

All-Star
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 14965
Location: South Carolina |
#55 Posted: 10/5/2012 4:34:06 PM Vegas buster.... I know your not gonna like this and I apologize. But as stated several times on here when the plays are posted, everyone has until the kickoff of the first game to post there plays. If you dont post before the first game is played you take a -55 point loss for the week. Im not being a smart behind or trying to be hard to get along with, but everyone has had ALL week to post there plays.
It's the same rules as last year and it's the same penalty that was given to those who didn't post there plays in time.
You and Bibendi have to take the -55 point loss for the week
Guys, you know im sorry. If I didn't do this, it wouldn't be fair to everyone else. 
|
|
quote |
|
|
|
Vegasbuster |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1926
Location: Louisiana |
#56 Posted: 10/6/2012 10:07:57 AM Meh.
Fairest way to do it was just like I did. Since a game had already played from the list, that guy gets -10. If two had already started from the list: -19.
..but I guess this is a way to reduce contestants with a chance to win because you know someone will miss a deadline; not everyone lives on Covers 24/7. |
|
quote |
|
Boom_Boom |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

All-Star
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 14965
Location: South Carolina |
#57 Posted: 10/6/2012 10:18:20 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by Vegasbuster: Meh.
Fairest way to do it was just like I did. Since a game had already played from the list, that guy gets -10. If two had already started from the list: -19.
..but I guess this is a way to reduce contestants with a chance to win because you know someone will miss a deadline; not everyone lives on Covers 24/7. The rules are and were stated. We cant change them because you think it should. Why is hard to follow simple rules? Nobody said to be on covers 24/7....you just needed to be on covers ONCE in a four day stretch Not hard if you ask me.
|
|
quote |
|
bibendi23 |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Bellagio | |

MVP
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16680
Location: Maryland |
#58 Posted: 10/6/2012 10:31:05 AM Yeah I deserve it
I completely forgot about this this week  |
|
quote |
|
Vegasbuster |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1926
Location: Louisiana |
#59 Posted: 10/6/2012 2:03:26 PM I'm not saying change the rules now, but having it work the way I stated is a much better system than handing out -55 before 99% of the games have even kicked off. |
|
quote |
|
PapaShango |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

All-Star
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12299
Location: |
#60 Posted: 10/7/2012 3:59:34 AM +31 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kro3Caums2c
|
|
quote |