Messages
Forum Index : Covers NBA Betting : Messages
Author: [NBA Betting] Topic: why even review that last shot by jackson?
Messier-11
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Messier-11
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9114
Location:
#1
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:34:58 AM
I had no money on the 2nd half line so I don't give a garbage, but it just seems really odd that they would even review it. It had zero impact on the game. The game is over. The call on the floor whether good or no good should be the end of it and everyone moves on to the next game. When the refs go back and review things just for the sake gambling lines it really makes you wonder. Even the announcers were mentioned it. Very fishy imo....not the right message being sent by the NBA after that whole tim donaghy scandal
quote
what_it_do send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
what_it_do
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 525
Location: California
#2
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:36:11 AM
VEGAS
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
troylex300 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
troylex300
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17564
Location: Florida
#3
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:39:44 AM
It's all about the benjamin, money corrupt every thing
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
LawsonJames
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
LawsonJames
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 29017
Location: California
#4
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:39:44 AM
Mess, it would have been fishy if they didnt review it imo.

I did not have a wager on that game but for the sake of consistency they need to review all buzzer beaters regardless if its the 1st quarter, 2nd quarter etc....
quote
UPNTHAPORT send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BookMaker |
UPNTHAPORT
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1346
Location: Louisiana
#5
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:40:21 AM

I had no bet on the 2nd Hald Either, But I agree it was called a 3 pointer on the Floor which had no implication on the Game and to go back and review it just to reverse the call was not a good look for the NBA...

Sorry to all that Fell Victim to that Call..
quote
UPNTHAPORT send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BookMaker |
UPNTHAPORT
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1346
Location: Louisiana
#6
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:42:23 AM

By the way the shot was good after further Review...
quote
football_007
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetDSI |
football_007
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 21512
Location: United States
#7
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:43:20 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by LawsonJames:

Mess, it would have been fishy if they didnt review it imo.

I did not have a wager on that game but for the sake of consistency they need to review all buzzer beaters regardless if its the 1st quarter, 2nd quarter etc....



I disagree with you here. If the shot change the outcome of the game, then review it. Like he said above that it has zero impact on the game, then why need to review it.
quote
KobezKing send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
KobezKing
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7100
Location:
#8
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:44:05 AM
shot was good reviewed it about 30 times with my cousin and in no way was shot not good. was off fingertips there was 0 eveidence to overturn that
quote
budwiser send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
budwiser
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4821
Location:
#9
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:44:40 AM
EXACTLY there is NO REASON to "review" a meaningless shot if it doesn't affect the game

the ONLY reason is because Vegas called and they wanted to cash
quote
budwiser send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
budwiser
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4821
Location:
#10
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:45:18 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by KobezKing:

shot was good reviewed it about 30 times with my cousin and in no way was shot not good. was off fingertips there was 0 eveidence to overturn that




it was absolute utter BULLSH!T that is the nba for ya
quote
CalBear send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
CalBear
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16634
Location: California
#11
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:45:40 AM
Im w/you...whats the purpose of reviewing. Same thing happened in chargers/steelers game in 2008. Steelers scored meaningles td to cover spread w/zero time remaining...refs literally took 10 min to review...they made up some bull garbage to over turn the call...and then immediately after when score was official admitted they made an error and td should of counted. 75% of bets on pitt that game...conspiracy ha. Still cannot believe there was no investigation into this game in which SD was called for 1 penalty/5 yds and pitt called for 13-15/100+ yds.
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
KobezKing send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
KobezKing
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7100
Location:
#12
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:47:51 AM

if the shot was no good i dont have a problem with it bein reviewed and not counting it. the problem i have is the shot was good from every review i did and them overturning it. Thats my problem.  Is there any way the league office looks at this and overturns it back
quote
Messier-11
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Messier-11
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9114
Location:
#13
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:49:56 AM
i didn't bother rewinding it and looking at any replays. Are you guys sure it was good and the reversed it anyway? Sometimes the game clock and shot clock are a little off from each other. That's the only explanation I can think of besides the refs just fixing the game for betting purposes. The plot thickens....
quote
SirJohnDrake send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
SirJohnDrake
Participation Meter
All-Star
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 12204
Location: United States
#14
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:51:05 AM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by Messier-11:

I had no money on the 2nd half line so I don't give a garbage, but it just seems really odd that they would even review it. It had zero impact on the game. The game is over. The call on the floor whether good or no good should be the end of it and everyone moves on to the next game. When the refs go back and review things just for the sake gambling lines it really makes you wonder. Even the announcers were mentioned it. Very fishy imo....not the right message being sent by the NBA after that whole tim donaghy scandal

Cmon don't be so naive...you really don't know why?...lol
quote
P4P send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
P4P
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8813
Location: British
              Columbia
#15
Posted: 6/5/2012 12:52:47 AM
They didn't review Danny Green's shot at the end of game 4. I'm not sure that was good either.
quote
KobezKing send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
KobezKing
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7100
Location:
#16
Posted: 6/5/2012 1:00:58 AM
messier i reveiwed it countless times now and i watched the clock and the red light on backboard and shot was clearly off fingertips from evrything i could see it was close but imo no way u could overturn it.  Bfor they overturned it i went back and looked cuz i knew it was close and wanted too check for myself and both me and my cuzin watchin game said it was good
quote
LawsonJames
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
LawsonJames
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 29017
Location: California
#17
Posted: 6/5/2012 1:01:19 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by P4P:

They didn't review Danny Green's shot at the end of game 4. I'm not sure that was good either.

hmmmmmm 

you are right did they review Danny Green's shot? Does anybody know?

Anyway I found this: Officials in the National Collegiate Athletic Association, National Basketball Association, Serie A (Italy), and Euroleague (Final Four series only, effective 2006) are required to use instant replay to assess whether a basket made at the end of a period was in fact before the game clock expired. Since 2002, the NBA also has mandated duplicate light strips on both the backboard and on the scorer's table for the purpose of identifying the end of period.

Seriously they should having friggin reviewed Green's shot if they didnt then something is fishy here? 
quote
P4P send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
P4P
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8813
Location: British
              Columbia
#18
Posted: 6/5/2012 1:12:14 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by LawsonJames:


hmmmmmm 

you are right did they review Danny Green's shot? Does anybody know?

Anyway I found this: Officials in the National Collegiate Athletic Association, National Basketball Association, Serie A (Italy), and Euroleague (Final Four series only, effective 2006) are required to use instant replay to assess whether a basket made at the end of a period was in fact before the game clock expired. Since 2002, the NBA also has mandated duplicate light strips on both the backboard and on the scorer's table for the purpose of identifying the end of period.

Seriously they should having friggin reviewed Green's shot if they didnt then something is fishy here? 


Lol you're telling me, I had Thunder -7 (live). Given the fact that Pop was SCREAMING at Ginobli not to foul when OKC was up 8 and the shot clock turned off and he did anyway, then Harden misses a free throw, followed by that iffy 3 at the buzzer I haven't had a beat that bad in ages.
quote
Forum Index : Covers NBA Betting : Messages
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.