Oh well I'm sure Quick would rather have the Cup and a ring over the Vezina lol
If this is true then how do you justify it based on the following Regular Season stats:
Games Played Quick - 69 Hank - 62
GAA Quick - 1.95 Hank - 1.97
Save % Quick - .929 Hank - .930
Shutouts Quick - 10 Hank - 8
Wins Quick - 35 Hank - 39
Not disagreeing that Hank deserved it, but not sure he deserved it more than Quick (based on reg. season numbers). Both were equal IMO (although stats show otherwise) and it could have gone either way. However, LA's offense was atrocious for more than half the season so Quick had no goal support and still got 35 wins on a team that average 2.29 GPG (2nd worst in the league while NYR averaged 2.71 GPG (11th best in the league).
If this is true then how do you justify it based on the following Regular Season stats:
Games Played Quick - 69 Hank - 62
GAA Quick - 1.95 Hank - 1.97
Save % Quick - .929 Hank - .930
Shutouts Quick - 10 Hank - 8
Wins Quick - 35 Hank - 39
Not disagreeing that Hank deserved it, but not sure he deserved it more than Quick (based on reg. season numbers). Both were equal IMO (although stats show otherwise) and it could have gone either way. However, LA's offense was atrocious for more than half the season so Quick had no goal support and still got 35 wins on a team that average 2.29 GPG (2nd worst in the league while NYR averaged 2.71 GPG (11th best in the league).
1. terrific regular season (1st-place finish)
2. strong pedigree/resume
3. tough place to play
4. consistency: 6 str yrs 35+ Ws...
IMO hank is a deserving winner...
quick's time will come
1. terrific regular season (1st-place finish)
2. strong pedigree/resume
3. tough place to play
4. consistency: 6 str yrs 35+ Ws...
IMO hank is a deserving winner...
quick's time will come
1. terrific regular season (1st-place finish)
2. strong pedigree/resume
3. tough place to play
4. consistency: 6 str yrs 35+ Ws...
IMO hank is a deserving winner...
quick's time will come
1. terrific regular season (1st-place finish)
2. strong pedigree/resume
3. tough place to play
4. consistency: 6 str yrs 35+ Ws...
IMO hank is a deserving winner...
quick's time will come
Uh.... REALLY? BOTH had great regular seasons BUT I can make an argument that Quick was more important to the Kings than Lundqvist to the Rangers because for most of the regular season the Kings couldn't SCORE.
hard to argue with either one, thought and I'm sure "Johannas Schnell" will take his Stanley Cup ring and Conn Smythe trophy as "consolation prizes"
Uh.... REALLY? BOTH had great regular seasons BUT I can make an argument that Quick was more important to the Kings than Lundqvist to the Rangers because for most of the regular season the Kings couldn't SCORE.
hard to argue with either one, thought and I'm sure "Johannas Schnell" will take his Stanley Cup ring and Conn Smythe trophy as "consolation prizes"
Uh.... REALLY? BOTH had great regular seasons BUT I can make an argument that Quick was more important to the Kings than Lundqvist to the Rangers because for most of the regular season the Kings couldn't SCORE.
hard to argue with either one, thought and I'm sure "Johannas Schnell" will take his Stanley Cup ring and Conn Smythe trophy as "consolation prizes"
Uh.... REALLY? BOTH had great regular seasons BUT I can make an argument that Quick was more important to the Kings than Lundqvist to the Rangers because for most of the regular season the Kings couldn't SCORE.
hard to argue with either one, thought and I'm sure "Johannas Schnell" will take his Stanley Cup ring and Conn Smythe trophy as "consolation prizes"
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.