Messages

Forum Index : Politics : Messages Page 4 of 4  1 2 3 4  
Author: [Politics] Topic: Santorum is a fuckin nutjob
FriedShrimp send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
FriedShrimp
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20685
Location: United States
#76
Posted: 2/11/2012 1:13:08 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by rooster010:

you dont really want to talk "values" Mr. Shrimp

Values are strong............. and I'm not even running for President.

quote
FriedShrimp send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
FriedShrimp
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20685
Location: United States
#77
Posted: 2/11/2012 1:13:46 PM
Just a voter........... with one vote.
quote
rooster010 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
rooster010
Participation Meter
All-Star
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 10899
Location: Mongolia
#78
Posted: 2/11/2012 1:31:57 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by FriedShrimp:

Values are strong............. and I'm not even running for President.

dont worry buddy,

i can love the player, and hate the game

and my dad always taught me that actions speak louder than words

quote
FriedShrimp send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
FriedShrimp
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20685
Location: United States
#79
Posted: 2/11/2012 2:32:42 PM

The political game is screwed up.

That Supreme Court ruling allowing unlimited campaign money was a big one.  I don't think we really noticed it at the time cuz were to pre-occupied with bashing Obama but that was a big one.

Marketing is powerful and money = marketing.

quote
FriedShrimp send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
FriedShrimp
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20685
Location: United States
#80
Posted: 2/11/2012 2:35:48 PM

If ask me............ the most important thing a Prez does is get involved with Supreme Court decisions.

Everything else is minor compared to that.

quote
Peppershooter
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Peppershooter
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 42
Location: Maryland
#81
Posted: 2/11/2012 2:47:06 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by esplanade:



Strong response


Your comment doesn't obligate any response much less a compelling one.  How old are you?

   Your personality.



Tool.
quote
dl36 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dl36
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 23542
Location: United States
#82
Posted: 2/13/2012 5:50:43 PM
quote
djbrow
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BookMaker |
djbrow
Participation Meter
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13383
Location: United States
#83
Posted: 2/13/2012 5:58:10 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by esplanade:

He looks great compared to the sack of garbage in the WH. Worst president ever.

Do you consider the current state of the stock market to be an indication of the worst president ever?

quote
dl36 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dl36
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 23542
Location: United States
#84
Posted: 2/13/2012 6:54:06 PM
espalande is always talking out of his behind.. I wouldnt expect a logical response..

covers knows
quote
dl36 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dl36
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 23542
Location: United States
#85
Posted: 2/15/2012 3:19:15 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by FriedShrimp:

If ask me............ the most important thing a Prez does is get involved with Supreme Court decisions.

Everything else is minor compared to that.



huge effect on the judicial branch tho...  those supreme court appointments last for many years after their presidency... 
quote
dl36 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dl36
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 23542
Location: United States
#86
Posted: 2/15/2012 3:20:38 AM
why don't we vote for supreme court justices?  or is a that a part of checks and balances in terms of the executive over the judicial branch?
quote
KOAJ send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
KOAJ
Participation Meter
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 66698
Location: New Jersey
#87
Posted: 2/15/2012 8:00:37 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by dl36:

why don't we vote for supreme court justices?  or is a that a part of checks and balances in terms of the executive over the judicial branch?


article 2 section 2

Impeachment.

concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.


quote
be easy send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
be easy
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15412
Location: Pennsylvania
#88
Posted: 2/15/2012 10:07:16 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by djbrow:

Do you consider the current state of the stock market to be an indication of the worst president ever?



depends

who benefits from high stock valuations (hyper devalued dollars)


Odd that the dems pretend to champion and help the little guy, and then also pat themselves on the back for making everything more expensive, while at the same time rah rah'ing about affordability.  Do the little guys wages increase under dem rule?

When i gauge a presidency, i favor lower prices and higher wages, but that's just me. I know i have the back-asswards view on affordability
quote
djbrow
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BookMaker |
djbrow
Participation Meter
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13383
Location: United States
#89
Posted: 2/15/2012 10:26:55 AM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by be easy:



depends

who benefits from high stock valuations (hyper devalued dollars)


Odd that the dems pretend to champion and help the little guy, and then also pat themselves on the back for making everything more expensive, while at the same time rah rah'ing about affordability.  Do the little guys wages increase under dem rule?

When i gauge a presidency, i favor lower prices and higher wages, but that's just me. I know i have the back-asswards view on affordability

I agree with this.

And I don't think the President should be judged on the state of the stock market, for many reasons (the most being the very small number of people that actually make the market go).

But there is a very good reason why I asked Esplanade this question and I am presuming he is avoiding a response.

quote
ClubDirt send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ClubDirt
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20246
Location: United States
#90
Posted: 2/15/2012 10:50:42 AM
"The S&P 500 has now gone 29 days without trading in negative territory for the year. That makes it the 14th-longest such feat since 1928."
quote
Forum Index : Politics : Messages Page 4 of 4  1 2 3 4  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.