| Author: |
[Politics] Topic: Santorum is a fuckin nutjob |
|
FriedShrimp |
 View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20685
Location: United States |
#76 Posted: 2/11/2012 1:13:08 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by rooster010:
you dont really want to talk "values" Mr. Shrimp
Values are strong............. and I'm not even running for President. |
|
quote |
|
FriedShrimp |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20685
Location: United States |
#77 Posted: 2/11/2012 1:13:46 PM |
|
quote |
|
rooster010 |
RSI  |
All-Star
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 10899
Location: Mongolia |
#78 Posted: 2/11/2012 1:31:57 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by FriedShrimp:
Values are strong............. and I'm not even running for President.
dont worry buddy,
i can love the player, and hate the game
and my dad always taught me that actions speak louder than words |
|
quote |
|
FriedShrimp |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20685
Location: United States |
#79 Posted: 2/11/2012 2:32:42 PM The political game is screwed up.
That Supreme Court ruling allowing unlimited campaign money was a big one. I don't think we really noticed it at the time cuz were to pre-occupied with bashing Obama but that was a big one.
Marketing is powerful and money = marketing. |
|
quote |
|
FriedShrimp |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20685
Location: United States |
#80 Posted: 2/11/2012 2:35:48 PM If ask me............ the most important thing a Prez does is get involved with Supreme Court decisions.
Everything else is minor compared to that. |
|
quote |
|
|
|
Peppershooter |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 41
Location: Maryland |
#81 Posted: 2/11/2012 2:47:06 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by esplanade: Strong response 
Your comment doesn't obligate any response much less a compelling one. How old are you?
 Your personality.
Tool.
|
|
quote |
|
dl36 |
RSI  |
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22404
Location: United States |
#82 Posted: 2/13/2012 5:50:43 PM |
|
quote |
|
djbrow |
RSI  |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11854
Location: United States |
#83 Posted: 2/13/2012 5:58:10 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by esplanade:
He looks great compared to the sack of garbage in the WH. Worst president ever.
Do you consider the current state of the stock market to be an indication of the worst president ever?  |
|
quote |
|
dl36 |
RSI |
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22404
Location: United States |
#84 Posted: 2/13/2012 6:54:06 PM
covers knows
|
|
quote |
|
dl36 |
RSI |
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22404
Location: United States |
#85 Posted: 2/15/2012 3:19:15 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by FriedShrimp: If ask me............ the most important thing a Prez does is get involved with Supreme Court decisions.
Everything else is minor compared to that.
huge effect on the judicial branch tho... those supreme court appointments last for many years after their presidency...
|
|
quote |
|
dl36 |
RSI |
Hall of Fame
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22404
Location: United States |
#86 Posted: 2/15/2012 3:20:38 AM
|
|
quote |
|
KOAJ |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 66698
Location: New Jersey |
#87 Posted: 2/15/2012 8:00:37 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by dl36:
why don't we vote for supreme court justices? or is a that a part of checks and balances in terms of the executive over the judicial branch?
article 2 section 2
Impeachment.
concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with
the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public
Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of
the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for,
and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the
Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President
alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
|
|
quote |
|
be easy |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
MVP
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15377
Location: Pennsylvania |
#88 Posted: 2/15/2012 10:07:16 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by djbrow:
Do you consider the current state of the stock market to be an indication of the worst president ever?
depends
who benefits from high stock valuations (hyper devalued dollars)
Odd that the dems pretend to champion and help the little guy, and then also pat themselves on the back for making everything more expensive, while at the same time rah rah'ing about affordability. Do the little guys wages increase under dem rule?
When i gauge a presidency, i favor lower prices and higher wages, but that's just me. I know i have the back-asswards view on affordability 
|
|
quote |
|
djbrow |
RSI |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11854
Location: United States |
#89 Posted: 2/15/2012 10:26:55 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by be easy:
depends
who benefits from high stock valuations (hyper devalued dollars)
Odd that the dems pretend to champion and help the little guy, and then also pat themselves on the back for making everything more expensive, while at the same time rah rah'ing about affordability. Do the little guys wages increase under dem rule?
When i gauge a presidency, i favor lower prices and higher wages, but that's just me. I know i have the back-asswards view on affordability
I agree with this.
And I don't think the President should be judged on the state of the stock market, for many reasons (the most being the very small number of people that actually make the market go).
But there is a very good reason why I asked Esplanade this question and I am presuming he is avoiding a response. |
|
quote |
|
ClubDirt |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
MVP
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16630
Location: United States |
#90 Posted: 2/15/2012 10:50:42 AM |
|
quote |