*** Season Long Challenge Week 6 ***

Forum: College Football Page 3 of 3  1 2 3  
Author: [College Football] Topic: *** Season Long Challenge Week 6 ***
tiasman PM tiasman
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3723
 
tiasman
Participation Meter
Veteran
Posted: 10/4/2012 5:42:29 PM
Tideman, I hope they prove me wrong!
Posted using a mobile device.
badlands PM badlands
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 54774
 
badlands
Participation Meter
Legend
Posted: 10/4/2012 5:46:34 PM
10. n. carolina -3.5
9.  utah +13
8.  texas  -7
7.  florida +3
6.  purdue  +3
5. maryland -4
4  penn state  -2.5
3.  oklahoma  -4
2.  south carolina -2.5
1.  nebraska +5
-29- PM -29-
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3304
 
-29-
Participation Meter
Veteran
Posted: 10/4/2012 7:27:08 PM

10- South Carolina

  9- North Carolina

  8- Louisiana State

  7- Northwestern

  6- Syracuse

  5- West Virginia

  4- Maryland

  3- Texas Tech

  2- Nebraska

  1- Utah

Vegasbuster PM Vegasbuster
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1950
 
Vegasbuster
Participation Meter
Veteran
Posted: 10/5/2012 4:15:25 PM

10. USC (taking loss)
9. LSU
8. Ohio St
7. VT
6. WVU
5. Georgia
4. UCLA
3. Michigan
2. Texas Tech
1. USF
Boom_Boom PM Boom_Boom
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 17054
 
Boom_Boom
Participation Meter
MVP
Posted: 10/5/2012 4:34:06 PM
Vegas buster.... I know your not gonna like this and I apologize. But as stated several times on here when the plays are posted, everyone has until the kickoff of the first game to post there plays. If you dont post before the first game is played you take a -55 point loss for the week. Im not being a smart behind or trying to be hard to get along with, but everyone has had ALL week to post there plays.

It's the same rules as last year and it's the same penalty that was given to those who didn't post there plays in time.


You and Bibendi have to take the -55 point loss for the week




Guys, you know im sorry. If I didn't do this, it wouldn't be fair to everyone else.



Vegasbuster PM Vegasbuster
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1950
 
Vegasbuster
Participation Meter
Veteran
Posted: 10/6/2012 10:07:57 AM
Meh.

Fairest way to do it was just like I did. Since a game had already played from the list, that guy gets -10. If two had already started from the list: -19. 

..but I guess this is a way to reduce contestants with a chance to win because you know someone will miss a deadline; not everyone lives on Covers 24/7.
Boom_Boom PM Boom_Boom
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 17054
 
Boom_Boom
Participation Meter
MVP
Posted: 10/6/2012 10:18:20 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Vegasbuster:

Meh.

Fairest way to do it was just like I did. Since a game had already played from the list, that guy gets -10. If two had already started from the list: -19. 

..but I guess this is a way to reduce contestants with a chance to win because you know someone will miss a deadline; not everyone lives on Covers 24/7.
The rules are and were stated. We cant change them because you think it should. Why is hard to follow simple rules? Nobody said to be on covers 24/7....you just needed to be on covers ONCE in a four day stretch Not hard if you ask me.
bibendi23 PM bibendi23
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16886
 
bibendi23
Participation Meter
MVP
Posted: 10/6/2012 10:31:05 AM
Yeah I deserve it



I completely forgot about this this week
Vegasbuster PM Vegasbuster
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1950
 
Vegasbuster
Participation Meter
Veteran
Posted: 10/6/2012 2:03:26 PM
I'm not saying change the rules now, but having it work the way I stated is a much better system than handing out -55 before 99% of the games have even kicked off.
PapaShango PM PapaShango
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 23004
 
PapaShango
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Posted: 10/7/2012 3:59:34 AM
+31


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kro3Caums2c
Forum: College Football Page 3 of 3  1 2 3  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.