Posted: 4/14/2012 2:42:24 AM
Dont you find it the least bit disturbing that you are the only one on your side? Everybody else CANT be wrong. That means you are having delusions of grandeur.
The very same day you made this post, someone was agreeing with me about balance in these forums in another thread. Looks like I'm not the only one. Now what? Is two good? Jay agrees with me. Is three sufficient? OGMike has called out the posters advocating racism too. Four good? Should I go on? No. If I came up with 400 you'd say there were 40,000 members who disagree and that pales in comparison. No use really arguing this. Proving you wrong on the 'only' bit was though.
How to you know Trayvon wasnt into drugs or robbery? Its IMPOSSIBLE for you to be 100% certain. Please admit that it is at least a possibility. Can you at least do that?
No. Because it will have no outcome on this case and justifies nothing, especially not a murder. It also feeds into the mass racial stereotype that all blacks are drug dealers and 'thugs' as you willfully embrace along with the idiot OP. It also gives whites a reason to 'suspect' Trayvon of wrongdoing on a walk home just like Zimmerman did WHICH LEAD TO THE SHOOTING. Watch who you are siding with before you type.
And also, where does this 100% certain requirement come in? Court cases are NEVER decided by 100% certainty. That is why I would find it very dangerous that you are a potential jury member for any case in your county.
Then you put words in Apaches mouth. He never said the media shouldnt focus on Trayvons case, he merely pointed out that a black man killed and raped an 85 year old white woman but it never made national attention because the whites in Tulsa didnt threaten to riot.
I did? He said a lot more about Trayvon Martin including all the slurs promoted by Neo-Nazi groups (all of which were false). He also said the rape 'never got much attention' which was referring to the MEDIA in relation to the Trayvon case (which was 'stirring up garbage'), which was his lead in in his post. He wasn't referring to the 'attention' at his local friggin cafe where he has a cup of joe among the other dopes he rubs shoulders with.
READ a POST AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN before typing something that makes little sense and wastes my time.
Apache is a good dude, he was simply trying to state that this case has been retardedly magnified when there are much more heinous crimes being committed out there, including the 2 white snipers. See, its not just about race with me, it the crime as a whole.
Well I think he's an idiot, along with yourself. Would you not agree, if you read both stories and didnt know races, that 2 elderly people being raped and killed would be worse than a 17 year old being shot on the street?
No, I wouldn't and neither would anyone else who was reasonable because the ONLY REASON this case made national news was because THERE WAS NO ARREST and it called into question a 'Stand Your Ground' which allows one person to kill another when they feel threatened (which is lunacy in itself).
The combination of the two caused the national controversy coupled with a non-black/black murder (originally reported in the police report, also botched, as a white on black crime) coupled with a botched police case as whole. That goes far beyond a 'rape' which happens thousands of times every year in this country no matter how heinous you think it is.