Messages

 

Mr bator ,the colts are a good team and there d has been playing great, but your just handing them a victory

 

much to easy.Hell i took the colts over baltimore sat, and to be honest with ya i thought they wouldve won

 

by 2 touchdowns.You can sit here and talk about all the mishaps 4 sd, but at the end of the day they just

 

werent disciplined or coached well enough, and the pats were.

 

green monster ,I KNOW MR BATOR IS A GOOD HANDICAPPER IT WAS JUST A LITTLE TRASH TALKING AND NOTHING MORE,I BELIEVE I EVEN WISHED HIM LUCK EVEN THOUGH WERE

ON OPPOSITE SIDES.I JUST DONT THINK THE COLTS ARE GOING TO WALK AWAY WITH THIS

THING LIKE HE DOES

Hi Mr. Bator,

 

Pinnacle has Chicago -1 (-119) but the rest of the internet books have Chicago - 2.5.  Now that Pinnacle pulled out of US, do you think the new pinnacle lines are going to strip out the public factor?  Might be a good angle here.

 

Tom and Mr.B.............

 

this might be THE BEST and MOST civilized dispute ever in covers history.  Good info while not diminishing each other, thanks for the input and wish you bot the best of luck  this weekend, once again

 

 

 

 

All I can say right now folks is,Colts have stepped up and want to end this bad habbit of losing in the playoffs.They are playing at home and lets stop shaking our heads and looking the the other way on that pats win.PATS GOT LUCKY WITH A BREAK.Colts earned there wins and manning is a due for game to throw 3 touchdowns or more.

Mr B.

 

 

I'm on New England.  There is something to be said for being on a roll.  I don't usually like to use that angle but the shoe fits here.  The Colts are 6-4 since the win in New England.   Brady threw 4 interceptions that night.  The AT Tennessee and AT Jacksonville wins by New England perked my interest in their shot at grabbing it all.  Clearly they were fortunate to get the fumble off the interception against San Diego.  It reminded me of the "tuck" play vs Oakland a few years back.  They are wearing that same crown again. Brady is Joe Montana and the Patriots like the 49er's of the 80's are the team of the 2000-2010 age.  Brady was below par at San Diego and he won't toss 2 stinkers in a row especially knowing what his performance was the last time against the Colts.   Additionally Maroney ran for 5 yards against San Diego and Dillon for 18.  Toss in Faulk's 25 and I don't see another stinker performance by this trio.

 

This  is a difining moment for peyton and if he doesnt win this one , nobodies gonna care about the records until hes retired,theyll just remember the great quarterback that could never beat the new england patriots

in the big game.

 

 

I agree

 

Manning has showed me nothing. I cant see how many people are on the colts. Last week Brady an company  did garbage on o the give up on the run an made Brady try to beat them even when he was off,

 

 

 

 

Ask your self a couple of ?s

 

1.Will Brady play that bad again. At the end of game star are born. Who would you want

2.Will the  be able to run the ball on the Colts

3.Bottomline what whould you take qb, dfense,hc,would you

 

 

 

Also for you die hard Mr Bator fans( I am  on 2)  how many time have you his top picks but yet he hedges almost 50%

so you be the judge

 

 

But I recpest all of you and I want to say thank you and keep up the hard work

and also basher cut that garbage out an grow up

 

 

WE ARE HERE TO MAKE  SO  LETS GET IT

 

 

Dude...  You dont get it do you?  Listen:  MrBator knows so much more than you about betting football.  I've read many posts of his and I think two of yours, and that's already as obvious as saying that Rosie is fat and disgusting.

 

I'm not saying that you cant disagree with someone, even if he does bet $100,000 a game, but bring something to the table if you're going to disagree with him. 

 

Have you seen how much some of these people bet?  Have you tracked how well they do?  Have you read their posts and how they approach their bets and their reasoning behind it all?  These guys, MrB probably above all else, know what they're doing. 

 

Listen to them.  Dont be so quick to disagree.  Do some thinking before you post. 

 

Last but not least... Good luck this weekend. 

 

 

alwayswin, thats a fair point. Therefore the basis between a system thats been "cherry picked", and one which has real merit is to gauge what that system has as it basis.

 

Systems based off of pure betting realities (Team A performs so & so as a 2.5-5.5 Dog when they scored X amount of points in their previous game that was an ATS loss) I personally see as having very little to no merit. These inevitably involve "cherry picking".

However, trends based off of fundamental achievements to do with core realities surrounding a sport (ie, in the NBA - a team's consistent output in a B2B situation off a SU win [here the Spurs are a very recent, solid example] where, in that day-to-day sport, heavy scheduling is identifiably a factor in how well teams do or dont perform) IMO are trends that can be looked to with a level of trust.

 

What Tom C is presenting here holds little value in my eyes. The danger with such *ungrounded* trends is always that there are more grounded, real-time factors (that have nothing to do with betting, but everything to do with the fundamentals of the sport concerned) which are seeing the results go the way they've gone, aspects his ultimately shallow trend simply dont account for, therefore cannot identify when they are absent for a result his system calls for, and when that result his system sees fails to be forthcoming, wonders how it let him down.