After the state’s rainy day fund was decimated by former Gov. Jim Doyle (D-Wi)....
An improving economy has pushed the state’s surplus up to $759.2 million, according to the Wisconsin Department of Administration State Controller’s Office’s Annual Fiscal Report released Monday...
Word of the better-than expected balance, which doesn’t take into account the hundreds of millions of dollars in state structural debt, follows on the heels of last week’s announcement of a proposed $100 million property tax cut, pitched by Gov. Scott Walker and Republican legislative leaders.
What a difference a couple of years make. When Gov.Scott Walker (R-Wi) took office in early 2011, the state faced a $3.6 billion budget shortfall.
“Our latest deposit of $153 million into the state’s rainy day fund is the largest in state history, and the $278 million balance of the fund is also the largest ever,” Walker noted.
A surplus in spite of the cost of the recall fiasco,,simply amazing ..what making tough decisions and leadership can do ..
After the state’s rainy day fund was decimated by former Gov. Jim Doyle (D-Wi)....
An improving economy has pushed the state’s surplus up to $759.2 million, according to the Wisconsin Department of Administration State Controller’s Office’s Annual Fiscal Report released Monday...
Word of the better-than expected balance, which doesn’t take into account the hundreds of millions of dollars in state structural debt, follows on the heels of last week’s announcement of a proposed $100 million property tax cut, pitched by Gov. Scott Walker and Republican legislative leaders.
What a difference a couple of years make. When Gov.Scott Walker (R-Wi) took office in early 2011, the state faced a $3.6 billion budget shortfall.
“Our latest deposit of $153 million into the state’s rainy day fund is the largest in state history, and the $278 million balance of the fund is also the largest ever,” Walker noted.
A surplus in spite of the cost of the recall fiasco,,simply amazing ..what making tough decisions and leadership can do ..
The Wisconson state results are not surprising,, considering that most Americans trust Republican's as the party better able to manage the economy and the government.
The Wisconson state results are not surprising,, considering that most Americans trust Republican's as the party better able to manage the economy and the government.
The Wisconson state results are not surprising,, considering that most Americans trust Republican's as the party better able to manage the economy and the government.
The Wisconson state results are not surprising,, considering that most Americans trust Republican's as the party better able to manage the economy and the government.
Tax revenue increased mainly because of economic recovery. . Not from lower tax rates, less regulations or fewer unions. Government cost control also helped to reduce deficit. According to Wisconsin legislative fiscal bureau, this surplus may become a $500+ million deficit in 2015-2017 because of proposed tax cuts.
Tax revenue increased mainly because of economic recovery. . Not from lower tax rates, less regulations or fewer unions. Government cost control also helped to reduce deficit. According to Wisconsin legislative fiscal bureau, this surplus may become a $500+ million deficit in 2015-2017 because of proposed tax cuts.
Since when did less regulation mean NO regulation?
I don't think anyone ever implied NO regulation and I don't think any repulsican would want NO regulation.
It is a straw man argument.
You are right Bowlslit.. No one said no regulations..it is less regulations ..Saying someone wants no regulations is taking it to the extreme to falsely accuse people not wanting any standards..
In 2011 a nationwide poll reveals that voters want dramatic change in how government regulations affect their lives. A whopping 78% of voters want government regulation to be less intrusive in people's daily choices in their lives and jobs....
Since when did less regulation mean NO regulation?
I don't think anyone ever implied NO regulation and I don't think any repulsican would want NO regulation.
It is a straw man argument.
You are right Bowlslit.. No one said no regulations..it is less regulations ..Saying someone wants no regulations is taking it to the extreme to falsely accuse people not wanting any standards..
In 2011 a nationwide poll reveals that voters want dramatic change in how government regulations affect their lives. A whopping 78% of voters want government regulation to be less intrusive in people's daily choices in their lives and jobs....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.