If in fact .........Alexis acquired an assault weapon from the federal security guards at the Navy Yard after shooting them ...
Than the Obama administration would be the ones who unwittenly supplied the shooter with the assault weapon..
If in fact .........Alexis acquired an assault weapon from the federal security guards at the Navy Yard after shooting them ...
Than the Obama administration would be the ones who unwittenly supplied the shooter with the assault weapon..
If in fact .........Alexis acquired an assault weapon from the federal security guards at the Navy Yard after shooting them ...
Than the Obama administration would be the ones who unwittenly supplied the shooter with the assault weapon..
Brows... Sly, Ricochet, and Villan keep responding with the same old crap excuses. Saying..Oh he couldn't get a AR-15 in D.C. la, la, la. !
You, at least, have some sense of understanding of the overall problem. But, to say that it was a failure in the system does not get to the root cause. Could security get better ?, of course. BUT the man still had those weapons ! Where did he get them is at the heart of the matter, and what Meds was he on ?
These are two issues the country must deal with. Drugs, Assault weapons,the Party of NO, and their followers...Rush, Levin, Hannity, Sly, Ricochet, Villan. Etc.
Brows... Sly, Ricochet, and Villan keep responding with the same old crap excuses. Saying..Oh he couldn't get a AR-15 in D.C. la, la, la. !
You, at least, have some sense of understanding of the overall problem. But, to say that it was a failure in the system does not get to the root cause. Could security get better ?, of course. BUT the man still had those weapons ! Where did he get them is at the heart of the matter, and what Meds was he on ?
These are two issues the country must deal with. Drugs, Assault weapons,the Party of NO, and their followers...Rush, Levin, Hannity, Sly, Ricochet, Villan. Etc.
These are two issues the country must deal with. Drugs, Assault weapons,the Party of NO, and their followers...Rush, Levin, Hannity, Sly, Ricochet, Villan. Etc.
Two issues .. .......lets count them :
Drugs... = 1
Assault weapons ... = 2
the Party of No .........= 3
and their followers...= 4
Don, it looks like you and Joe "three letter word J-O-B-S " Biden have a little math problem..
LMGO and ROLF....
These are two issues the country must deal with. Drugs, Assault weapons,the Party of NO, and their followers...Rush, Levin, Hannity, Sly, Ricochet, Villan. Etc.
Two issues .. .......lets count them :
Drugs... = 1
Assault weapons ... = 2
the Party of No .........= 3
and their followers...= 4
Don, it looks like you and Joe "three letter word J-O-B-S " Biden have a little math problem..
LMGO and ROLF....
But, to say that it was a failure in the system does not get to the root cause. Could security get better ?, of course. BUT the man still had those weapons ! Where did he get them is at the heart of the matter, and what Meds was he on ?
Your original conclusion to these kind of shootings has been that we need stricter "gun control " laws..as the solution.
But now the fact, that the shooter had mental problems and had been treated by the VA for psychological issues including “hearing voices” in his head .we see you are adding a little caveat to your weapons grab scenario- -check his Meds-.......too funny ..Don..
But, to say that it was a failure in the system does not get to the root cause. Could security get better ?, of course. BUT the man still had those weapons ! Where did he get them is at the heart of the matter, and what Meds was he on ?
Your original conclusion to these kind of shootings has been that we need stricter "gun control " laws..as the solution.
But now the fact, that the shooter had mental problems and had been treated by the VA for psychological issues including “hearing voices” in his head .we see you are adding a little caveat to your weapons grab scenario- -check his Meds-.......too funny ..Don..
These are two issues the country must deal with. Drugs, Assault weapons,the Party of NO, and their followers...Rush, Levin, Hannity, Sly, Ricochet, Villan. Etc.
These are two issues the country must deal with. Drugs, Assault weapons,the Party of NO, and their followers...Rush, Levin, Hannity, Sly, Ricochet, Villan. Etc.
i'll sleep just fine tonight. Thanks Don
if you change your mind...
https://www.cabelas.com/product/Bushmaster-Firearms-AR-Rifles/1143590.uts
i'll sleep just fine tonight. Thanks Don
if you change your mind...
https://www.cabelas.com/product/Bushmaster-Firearms-AR-Rifles/1143590.uts
Two issues .. .......lets count them :
Drugs... = 1
Assault weapons ... = 2
the Party of No .........= 3
and their followers...= 4
Don, it looks like you and Joe "three letter word J-O-B-S " Biden have a little math problem..
LMGO and ROLF....
His meds make him a little loopy.
Two issues .. .......lets count them :
Drugs... = 1
Assault weapons ... = 2
the Party of No .........= 3
and their followers...= 4
Don, it looks like you and Joe "three letter word J-O-B-S " Biden have a little math problem..
LMGO and ROLF....
His meds make him a little loopy.
there are so many children dying these days i can't keep up with it. Are we talking about the children the nobel peace prize winner is killing in yemen, pakistan and afghanistan?? Or are we talking about the deaths of the children in syria that some say was done by the usa backed fsa rebels? Damn these times are confusing.
there are so many children dying these days i can't keep up with it. Are we talking about the children the nobel peace prize winner is killing in yemen, pakistan and afghanistan?? Or are we talking about the deaths of the children in syria that some say was done by the usa backed fsa rebels? Damn these times are confusing.
there are so many children dying these days i can't keep up with it. Are we talking about the children the nobel peace prize winner is killing in yemen, pakistan and afghanistan?? Or are we talking about the deaths of the children in syria that some say was done by the usa backed fsa rebels? Damn these times are confusing.
there are so many children dying these days i can't keep up with it. Are we talking about the children the nobel peace prize winner is killing in yemen, pakistan and afghanistan?? Or are we talking about the deaths of the children in syria that some say was done by the usa backed fsa rebels? Damn these times are confusing.
I just can't make the leap of logic from being a responsible law abiding gun owner..... to child killer.
It does not compute.
It is like saying that because I enjoy Bacon and eggs for breakfast, I am responsible for people dying of heart disease.
Or that I am responsible for drunk driving because I drink, and I own a car.
Or I killed OJ's wife because I own knives.
I just can't make the leap of logic from being a responsible law abiding gun owner..... to child killer.
It does not compute.
It is like saying that because I enjoy Bacon and eggs for breakfast, I am responsible for people dying of heart disease.
Or that I am responsible for drunk driving because I drink, and I own a car.
Or I killed OJ's wife because I own knives.
Notice the last 3 deflections away from all of the children ?
PrivateJohn67 is referring to foreign children.
Villan.. is talking about some of the children.
Ricochet.. says he's a responsible gun owner. He didn't say ASSAULT WEAPONS owner.
I win this thread by a mile.. Someday you'll smarten up, when tragedy hits close to home. I hope not, but don't tempt fate.
Notice the last 3 deflections away from all of the children ?
PrivateJohn67 is referring to foreign children.
Villan.. is talking about some of the children.
Ricochet.. says he's a responsible gun owner. He didn't say ASSAULT WEAPONS owner.
I win this thread by a mile.. Someday you'll smarten up, when tragedy hits close to home. I hope not, but don't tempt fate.
don juan | |
Veteran Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 4027 Location: Florida | #7 Posted: 9/16/2013 2:44:07 PMQUOTE Originally Posted by djbrow: Is there any evidence that an assault weapon was used or are you suggesting that all guns are assault weapons. According to the Washington Post. Two law enforcement officials said one shooter, the dead one, had an assault weapon, shot gun, and a hand gun. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/police-search-for-active-shooter-on-grounds-of-washington-navy-yard-in-southeast-dc/2013/09/16/b1d72b9a-1ecb-11e3-b7d1-7153ad47b549_story.html |
don juan | |
Veteran Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 4027 Location: Florida | #7 Posted: 9/16/2013 2:44:07 PMQUOTE Originally Posted by djbrow: Is there any evidence that an assault weapon was used or are you suggesting that all guns are assault weapons. According to the Washington Post. Two law enforcement officials said one shooter, the dead one, had an assault weapon, shot gun, and a hand gun. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/police-search-for-active-shooter-on-grounds-of-washington-navy-yard-in-southeast-dc/2013/09/16/b1d72b9a-1ecb-11e3-b7d1-7153ad47b549_story.html |
Per almost every issue with liberals "it's for the children". Most liberals cannot win an argument on facts and a rational discussion so they have to bring in the children card. Just look at Obama and the leading Dems on Syria. It's all because children are dying on the cold hospital floors (as if dying on a warm floor is better?) after being gassed (allegedly).
Haven't watched any news on this shooting but I'd be willing to bet some Dems are out there running their mouth saying things like "how many more children must die due to gun violence"? It is for the children afterall because in Dem lala land a child's life can be exploited far more than an adult life.
Per almost every issue with liberals "it's for the children". Most liberals cannot win an argument on facts and a rational discussion so they have to bring in the children card. Just look at Obama and the leading Dems on Syria. It's all because children are dying on the cold hospital floors (as if dying on a warm floor is better?) after being gassed (allegedly).
Haven't watched any news on this shooting but I'd be willing to bet some Dems are out there running their mouth saying things like "how many more children must die due to gun violence"? It is for the children afterall because in Dem lala land a child's life can be exploited far more than an adult life.
Isn't that the truth Danrules,
Did you catch the last part of President Obama's speech last week on why we should bomb Syria ?
"America is not the world's policeman. Terrible things happen across the globe, and it is beyond our means to right every wrong, but when with modest effort and risk we can stop children from being gassed to death and thereby make our own children safer over the long run, I believe we should act. " said Obama .
We need to bomb Syria for the children...............
Isn't that the truth Danrules,
Did you catch the last part of President Obama's speech last week on why we should bomb Syria ?
"America is not the world's policeman. Terrible things happen across the globe, and it is beyond our means to right every wrong, but when with modest effort and risk we can stop children from being gassed to death and thereby make our own children safer over the long run, I believe we should act. " said Obama .
We need to bomb Syria for the children...............
No sly, I'm calling for assault weapons control.
Don, serious question: If I allow that there is really need for assault rifles and they are banned, does this emotion get turned toward the next weapon of choice?
I guess my contention is that most people are this emotional because of the amount of people that can be killed so quickly with an assault rifle. My question: is why does this matter? What if there is only one person killed and it is done by a lunatic with a baseball bat? Isn't this swerving the real issue of how to control/spot/treat lunatics?
What if people were free to have assault rifles but for whatever reason lunatics chose to use steak knives? Does it make that big a difference because they are only able to kill 2-3 people at a time before being stopped?
I would like your seriouos thoughts on this. Thanks.
No sly, I'm calling for assault weapons control.
Don, serious question: If I allow that there is really need for assault rifles and they are banned, does this emotion get turned toward the next weapon of choice?
I guess my contention is that most people are this emotional because of the amount of people that can be killed so quickly with an assault rifle. My question: is why does this matter? What if there is only one person killed and it is done by a lunatic with a baseball bat? Isn't this swerving the real issue of how to control/spot/treat lunatics?
What if people were free to have assault rifles but for whatever reason lunatics chose to use steak knives? Does it make that big a difference because they are only able to kill 2-3 people at a time before being stopped?
I would like your seriouos thoughts on this. Thanks.
Notice the last 3 deflections away from all of the children ?
PrivateJohn67 is referring to foreign children.
Villan.. is talking about some of the children.
Ricochet.. says he's a responsible gun owner. He didn't say ASSAULT WEAPONS owner.
I win this thread by a mile.. Someday you'll smarten up, when tragedy hits close to home. I hope not, but don't tempt fate.
Are "foreign" children's lives worth less?
Notice the last 3 deflections away from all of the children ?
PrivateJohn67 is referring to foreign children.
Villan.. is talking about some of the children.
Ricochet.. says he's a responsible gun owner. He didn't say ASSAULT WEAPONS owner.
I win this thread by a mile.. Someday you'll smarten up, when tragedy hits close to home. I hope not, but don't tempt fate.
Are "foreign" children's lives worth less?
Are "foreign" children's lives worth less?
Absolutely NOT.. but what WE can do here is to take care of our children. We cannot control what happens in China.
Are "foreign" children's lives worth less?
Absolutely NOT.. but what WE can do here is to take care of our children. We cannot control what happens in China.
Don, serious question: If I allow that there is really need for assault rifles and they are banned, does this emotion get turned toward the next weapon of choice?
I guess my contention is that most people are this emotional because of the amount of people that can be killed so quickly with an assault rifle. My question: is why does this matter? What if there is only one person killed and it is done by a lunatic with a baseball bat? Isn't this swerving the real issue of how to control/spot/treat lunatics?
What if people were free to have assault rifles but for whatever reason lunatics chose to use steak knives? Does it make that big a difference because they are only able to kill 2-3 people at a time before being stopped?
I would like your seriouos thoughts on this. Thanks.
Wow, some people just don't get it !
Okay, Let's take it to a higher level then. What if we allowed every individual to have a small nuclear bomb ? Shall we say, oh, they only blew up Rhode Island or Oklahoma, it's not hurting us here in Texas.
Don, serious question: If I allow that there is really need for assault rifles and they are banned, does this emotion get turned toward the next weapon of choice?
I guess my contention is that most people are this emotional because of the amount of people that can be killed so quickly with an assault rifle. My question: is why does this matter? What if there is only one person killed and it is done by a lunatic with a baseball bat? Isn't this swerving the real issue of how to control/spot/treat lunatics?
What if people were free to have assault rifles but for whatever reason lunatics chose to use steak knives? Does it make that big a difference because they are only able to kill 2-3 people at a time before being stopped?
I would like your seriouos thoughts on this. Thanks.
Wow, some people just don't get it !
Okay, Let's take it to a higher level then. What if we allowed every individual to have a small nuclear bomb ? Shall we say, oh, they only blew up Rhode Island or Oklahoma, it's not hurting us here in Texas.
Absolutely NOT.. but what WE can do here is to take care of our children. We cannot control what happens in China.
WE could demand that our president not bomb children in countries that we are not at war with.
If you think that Obama has not directly targeted children through his executive Kill List, you might want to read up on the American Child that Obama droned, at the same time he was crying alligator tears for Treyvon.
https://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-death-10470891
Absolutely NOT.. but what WE can do here is to take care of our children. We cannot control what happens in China.
WE could demand that our president not bomb children in countries that we are not at war with.
If you think that Obama has not directly targeted children through his executive Kill List, you might want to read up on the American Child that Obama droned, at the same time he was crying alligator tears for Treyvon.
https://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-death-10470891
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.