| Author: |
[Sports Lottery] Topic: To all Ontario Proline Players |
|
TheFukster |
 View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 34
Location: |
#1 Posted: 1/2/2009 4:20:30 PM Guys, what happen to this place ?
This was at one time the place to come for great information on Proline Picks.
I am hoping that we can restore what was once the best Proline forum on the planet. I need for some new members here to show a raise of hands and lets try and rebuild this place to the place it was before.
I will be posting each day the Proline odds and trying to hammer out some winners.
Tonight is a great night to start. So heres what I got on tap for you for tonight.
Take New Jersey Devils @ 1.80 to win ( Habs with a ton of injuries)
Take Elias @ 2.00 to beat  Kovalev ( Kovalev to Kovalev , he shoots, he scores,lmao.) Not a chance
Take the OVER 5.5 @ 1.60 in the Flyers Ducks game.
3 - $100 tickets, each paying $576.00
GL tonight boys 
|
|
quote |
|
car |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4981
Location: Nova Scotia |
#2 Posted: 1/3/2009 7:05:15 AM nice picks last night fukster...
|
|
quote |
|
grapegrower |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Location: |
#3 Posted: 1/3/2009 9:04:36 AM Hey Fukster, I took your advice and joined. I'd like to see this site become a proline hot spot. Those olg person take too much of my money, so I agree the more minds involved better chance to take some money from them.  |
|
quote |
|
grapegrower |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Location: |
#4 Posted: 1/3/2009 9:09:41 AM Today I like
PIT/GGTN- Tie/GGTN -2.5
TENN/KANS- Tie
XAV-VIRG- XAV win/-3.5
WKFR/BRYG- Tie |
|
quote |
|
DeTerMiNeD |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2633
Location: Ontario |
#5 Posted: 1/4/2009 3:57:58 PM
My $50 ticket for today:
Baltimore 1.90 - Couldn't see how Dolphins score?! Philly 1.90 - Will shut down AP, and force Jackson to try and beat them with his arm against a quality secondary. Can't see it...?! New Jersey 1.45 - Ottawa playing B2B on the road vs. a hot team USC 1.20 - Double digit favorite, better team, only need a 6 point win UCLA 1.30 - Same as above, but crossing fingers
|
|
quote |
|
|
|
TheFukster |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 34
Location: |
#6 Posted: 1/4/2009 7:16:05 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by DeTerMiNeD:
Welcome back, Fukster! Yeah, it used to be a hotspot, but when you and a bunch of others left, I stopped posting on the sports lottery thread, and looked for dialogue elsewhere. Hopefully we can restore this place to its former glory!
My $50 ticket for today:
Baltimore 1.90 - Couldn't see how Dolphins score?!
Philly 1.90 - Will shut down AP, and force Jackson to try and beat them with his arm against a quality secondary. Can't see it...?!
New Jersey 1.45 - Ottawa playing B2B on the road vs. a hot team
USC 1.20 - Double digit favorite, better team, only need a 6 point win
UCLA 1.30 - Same as above, but crossing fingers
Yes, I do remember you 
What the heck happened over here ? I was at Cappersmall for awhile, but got banned. I just couldn't get along with cptkirk, fuking guy thinks hes god over there,lmao. Its ok for him to be a smart behind and poke fun at people, but when someone calls him out he pounds his chest as if he thinks he king of the castle. I just had enough of his bullshit really.
Hopefully we can restore what was once the best place to come to talk about proline.
|
|
quote |
|
packersbackers |
RSI  |
All-Star
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14342
Location: Ontario |
#7 Posted: 1/5/2009 3:03:12 PM hey fukster...welcome.
i tried my best last season with posting college hoops lines around 1amEDT or so when they came out with their pointspread lines online...sometimes you can really get a game that's off by a few points and take real advantage of line mov'ts and such just before tip off, but i do keep them to only 2 gamers, however the payoff's/odds they give us are truly disgusting.
my advice to you and anyone else in canada or even bordering areas in the states, is to get someone to place bets for you at either Windsor or Niagara Falls casino's...at least they let you play all wagers with a 2 game minimum in proline/over under/pointspread, and they give better odds than regular provincial lotto...however, the sticky part is that you can only place and collect your wagers within the casino, so you really do need an inside guy there to place your bets.
just a few things to think about, i will however try my best to post college hoops lines from OLG's website and my thoughts on where value can be found...take care |
|
quote |
|
packersbackers |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14342
Location: Ontario |
#8 Posted: 1/5/2009 3:08:07 PM obviously betting with a reputable sportsbook is your best option, so that you don't have to be forced to bet parlays, but i know the allure and desire to get that cash the following day by placing bets with OLG.
|
|
quote |
|
poutsaras |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Location: |
#9 Posted: 1/6/2009 10:01:14 AM who remebers about 3 years ago this place had about 100 plus proline players now it's down to about 5 of us wowwww, i blame it on when the props went from the point spread pay out to the odds payout lol im serious |
|
quote |
|
grapegrower |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Location: |
#10 Posted: 1/6/2009 5:24:13 PM Bloody OLG god forbid if you win money, did you hear about the misprinted scratch tickets. Some guy won $100,000 + and they say they can't honour the tickets, cheap person! Not his fault the OLG screwed up. |
|
quote |
|
primetimeblitz |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1382
Location: Canada |
#11 Posted: 1/7/2009 1:36:12 AM willing to add my input to the forum, i hate olg. bunch of friggin person. so close of hitting a nice 5 play parlay. those bloody sharks cost me $689.  |
|
quote |
|
garnabby |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Location: Canada |
#12 Posted: 7/5/2010 10:37:39 AM Anyone remember the name of that fellow a few years back who beat Pro Line out of 100's of thousands?
They later restricted his play to $100 at any one venue, to discourage his play... and then had the taxation office (unsuccessfully) try to hit him up for taxes on it. |
|
quote |
|
wmp66 |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1727
Location: Nova Scotia |
#13 Posted: 7/6/2010 5:57:23 PM |
|
quote |
|
Triballife |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Location: |
#14 Posted: 7/9/2010 1:29:13 AM
Interview from a few years back from elsewhere...
Most proline players who visit the internet
gambling forums are familiar with the names Poindexter and Dilbert.
After playing in the Ottawa area for many years they came to national
attention in 1999 with a $1.7 million dollar win
against the Atlantic Lottery Corporation. This was not their first nor
their last large win against the lottery corporations in Canada. Their
successes in Ontario forced the OLGC to implement counter measures to
protect themselves. These include the $100 max per customer, the $1000
store sales limit, liability limits on certain combinations and the
pulling of games off the proline list if too much money is bet.
Currently
Poindexter and Dilbert are engaged in a legal battle with Revenue
Canada which seems somewhat confused by the fact that lottery winnings
are tax free. While in Ottawa recently to meet with his lawyers, I had
the pleasure of meeting with Poindexter for an afternoon to discuss
Proline sports betting. He agreed to let me tape the meeting and
provide the text of the discussion on this web site.
[Added
note: In December 2006 the Tax Court of Canada handed down its decision
in the case of Crown vs Leblanc. The judge ruled that their winnings of
over $5 million were not considered as taxable income.]
I
encouraged Poindexter to go into some of the more amusing episodes of
their gambling ventures and I hope that I've managed to convey a least
a small part of the afternoon's hiliarity here.
First some background .....
Can you tell us a little about yourself?
I'm 34. Presently living in London, England.
How and when did get started on proline betting?
I've
always been interested in gambling, even as a teenager. Used to go the
race track a lot, off-track betting, and when the proline started I got
interested in sports betting.
I started playing 13 years ago at
the age of 21. I was just barely old enough to buy the tickets. When it
first came out I saw that there was an opportunity there.. I'm a
lifelong addicted gambler. [laughter all around].
Are you a big sports fan or is it just the gambling part that attracted you to proline?
I like sports a lot. Especially watching sports - mostly hockey football and golf.
I'm
curious if you play any other games where someone with your analytical
mind would have an advantage - such as chess or backgammon or poker?
Not
really seriously. I do like chess a lot but I never play it very much.
I just don’t have the time. Any game that involves the mind I like.
Poker I like a lot but play hardly ever. I’d like to start playing
online, but there’s a lot of things to do on my list first.
I first heard about your wins from an article in the Sun which said that there were three partners. Is that accurate?
No,
they got that wrong. Its always just been my brother and I from the
start. Although I live in London now Dilbert takes care of the proline
bets for us here.
Have you done many interviews in the past?
Several
times by various newspapers. About 5 years ago I was interviewed for a
CBC documentary. They did a fair story on the proline situation.
With all your winnings I'm surprised they never used your picture for their games list ...
Dilbert
had his picture taken by the Quebec lottery corporation. They did use
it for advertising. This was before, when they still wanted us to play.
Before they lost and realized that they were going to lose and altered
history to portray a somewhat different version of events than what
happened.
What are your future plans? When you have had enough of beating the Olgc you’ll move on to what?
I
enjoy what I do - If I didn't I wouldn't still be playing. We would
like to get into other gambling related areas at some time.
When
the proline first started I knew a lot of very knowlegeable people who
were into high stakes sports betting and I mentioned to them that this
looked like a great opportunity and I was surprised that everyone
dismissed it as a waste of time because of the high take out (hold)....
Yes.
No-one looked any deeper to see how weak the lines were. I would much
prefer a high takeout with highly inefficient odds as compared to a low
takeout with highly efficient odds. Dilbert and I realized right away
that there were advantage plays to be found by comparing the proline
odds to the bookmaker odds. When we first started we were just using
the lines out of the newspaper every day.
Do you think that the OLGC makes up their own odds or that they buy them from a lines consultant firm?
I
think they make their own odds. They use the offshore numbers to set
their lines but I think they get greedy and try to manipulate the lines
by moving them from where they should be to take advantage of how they
believe the general public is going to bet the game. For example if the
favourite is 6.5 then they might try to raise that to 7.5, or even
higher, believing that most of the public will bet the favourite
anyways. Then when someone like me comes along and takes advantage of
their greed by betting the other side they get all pissed off. |
|
quote |
|
Triballife |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Location: |
#15 Posted: 7/9/2010 1:30:32 AM Isn’t true that to some degree that offshore and Vegas books do the same?
Perhaps in the early days but now it’s not really the general public
that determines the lines but the large bettors that would set the
market. The offshore or Vegas lines are basically the same as any other
type of money market which determines prices. A money market as such
tends to be very efficient at determining the right prices.
Do you bet online yourself?
No I haven’t at all. I’ve always assumed the offshore oddsmakers know what they’re doing so I never really saw any point to it.
Many players long for the early days. Is the potential of winning at proline as good as it used to be?
I think the potential is still there. It could be argued that they're
better at doing their odds now. I’m not sure if I that’s actually true
or not, but the potential is definitely still there. There’s so many
more opportunities because there’s many more games on the list than
there used to be. They seem to be getting very greedy in offering so
many games now. Probably in part because we haven’t been very active in
the past few years.
I've often said
that their greed outruns their common sense. They come up with an idea
to make money and they’re in such a hurry to cash in that nobody takes
the time to think it through properly..
Yes, I agree with
that - they don’t take the time to think anything through. The problems
now are the limits on stores and the liability limits. Now to win a lot
of money you have to work harder, but the opportunities are still there.
Any advice for the average player to be a more skillful player?
It's just a matter of looking at the proline odds and comparing them to
the offshore odds really. Then just hope that the offshore oddsmakers
are right and the proline oddsmakers are wrong. Over time that guess is
usually correct. [laughter by all]
I
know from our previous conversation that you've played at one time or
another in all the lottery areas with the exception of British
Columbia. I'd like to go through the provinces and get the best story
you have from each .....
 Starting
with the Atlantic Provinces - the link at the top is for your win of
$1.7 million on the Nba - can you tell us more about that?
We
were playing proline regularly at a store in Ottawa where the retailer
had a brother who owned a store in Moncton. Through him we set up an
arrangement whereby we would wire the money out there and then phone
our plays in to him.
I remember in a
Sun article at the time it mentions you pacing a hotel room out there
while awaiting the results in the last game ....
No that was
inaccurate. To be honest, in this case the papers got it wrong because
I lied about that. We didn’t want the Atlantic Lottery to know that we
were phoning the plays in to a store there. When my brother and I
realized that night how big our win was, I did arrange to fly out there
on the first morning flight to collect our tickets and redeem them.
 I believe that it was about the same time that you made your first big win in Quebec.
Can you tell us about that?
We
started playing at a store in Quebec and making fairly large, well very
large, wagers. The lottery corporation was all happy at first and they
accomodated us by allowing the store to raise thier limit from the
$25,000 maximum for a half-week period. They did this by getting us to
get letters of credit for $50,000 each and depositing $125,000 in
advance into the Lotto-Quebec bank account. Once that was done we were
allowed a limit of $225,000 for a half-week.
How long did that arrangement continue?
Not
that long.... After the $225,000 limit was put in we connected for $1.7
million and a week later for $1.5 million. Then they no longer allowed
the advance deposits and refused to accept our letters of credit, in
effect bringing us back to $25,000. They also made statements that this
game was not intended for that kind of betting! And they were quoted in
the newspapers as saying that money laundering was one of several
possibilities and that they’d reported us to the Quebec police.
I shouldn’t be laughing because that’s actually getting quite ....
Yes
it getting dirty. That’s the best way to put it, although I can laugh
about it now. To make a long story short they were willing to aid
someone they suspected of money laundering and didn’t care as long as
they thought they were making a profit, but when they lost they decided
to alter their definition of what their game was for and backdate it.
Let's move on to Ontario and the OLGC ......
Can you tell us the story of the garbage bags full of tickets?
For
many years the lottery corporation had no problem with us cashing our
tickets at a one local retailer. The lottery corporation had a policy
with retailers that if you owed them money it had to be paid by the due
date or else they would suspend the terminal. But if the retailer was
owed money because he had used the store money to pay winning tickets,
then this would just remain as a credit that they had to work off with
more sales. That was the general policy, however if the store’s balance
was very large they could phone the lottery corporation and request an
immediate settlement. |
|
quote |
|
Triballife |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Location: |
#16 Posted: 7/9/2010 1:31:00 AM Then one day the OLGC decided that
they no longer wanted us to redeem tickets at the store anymore. They
told the retailer not to cash our tickets for us and that if he did he
would no longer be able to get an immediate settlement for his credit
balance. This would of course lead to him having a balance with the
OLGC that he might never be able to work off. So although it says right
on the ticket that that it can be redeemed at the retailer's, this
apparently didn't apply to us. The reason probably being that they are
required to pay a 2% commission to the retailer for cashing winning
tickets. To avoid this they wanted me to go the head office in Toronto
to cash all my tickets. For a while we tried cashing them a different
stores but some had their lottery terminals closed down for aiding us.
Another retailer was reimbursed for the cash paid out but they refused
to pay the commission, clearly in violation of their contract. But I
guess if you believe that you’re above the law that doesn’t matter.
After
talking to the OLGC, we were told that we had to take all our tickets
to Toronto to cash them. So we did. We actually read the rules and
follow them. It states in the rules that the ticket control number is
the only thing which determines if a ticket is a winner or a loser.
According to this rule there’s no actual way of determining whether a
ticket is a winner without putting it through a terminal. So every
ticket as far as I’m concerned is a possible winner, there’s no way can you can know different. So we got all our possible winning tickets and filled seven garbage bags full of them and went off to Toronto.
Where you standing in the line with these bags of tickets?
I
had my mom with me at the time, she helped me carry in all the bags. As
far as I was concerned I was just another customer who wanted to check
his tickets. We were though getting looks from the other people there.
When I got to the front off the line I told them I’d brought all my
tickets in to check. They told us that we couldn’t do this. I explained
that they were all possible winners and that I was told to
bring all my tickets here for validating because I wasn’t do it at the
retailers. They said that they weren’t going to take the tickets. My
attitude was screw that you have to take them, so I just put them on
the counter and walked out.
A week later we got a letter
from the OLGC saying that they were not going to check the tickets and
that they could make the argument that I had abandoned the tickets and
they could therefore throw them out. I knew that there was no way they
would ever have thrown them out, as they were all possible
winners - they’d leave themselves open to being sued for my estimate of
their value. I know for certain that there were winners in those
tickets. Or let’s say, that some were not only possible winners but even probable winners. We did put in a few thousand dollars of worth of probable
winners just to make sure. I'm almost certain that there would have
been even more winners in the bags aside from the ones we seeded in.
Next
they sent us a letter saying that they were going to courier the
tickets back to us. I then saw my lawyer and we filed a motion in court
seeking to force them to check all the tickets. At this point their
lawyers got in touch with ours and reached a settlement. I don’t know
if I can go into this too much more without checking, as I’m not sure
if the agreement included any confidentiality clause, but I can say for
sure that they did eventually validate all the tickets.
|
|
quote |
|
Triballife |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Location: |
#17 Posted: 7/9/2010 1:31:10 AM That must have taken a while
It
took them six months to do them all. They want to have rules in place
to protect themselves but I see no reason why I can’t use the same
rules to protect myself. I told them their rules clearly state that is
only the control number which matters not what the games listed on the
ticket are. They told me that they didn’t care what the rules say and
that was it.
There have been
numerous cases in the papers where people sued the OLGC over winnings.
Have you ever had to resort to legal measures to get paid?
No, every winning ticket we’ve had has been paid. The only time we’ve
needed to use legal action is to force them to check the garbage bags
full of tickets. In the cases I’ve read about I always felt that the
OLGC were actually right and I’m surprised that they settled. For
example the case of the soccer games were they had the wrong dates. The
definition of a game includes the team names and the date. If those two
teams do not play on that exact date then the way I see it that event
didn’t even occur. I don’t get why they settled on those. I wouldn’t
have even played them. We check the dates on the games ourselves and if
it isn’t correct we don't play. I would fully expect the odds to be
reset to 1.00.
How about the Western Canada Lottery Corporation.
I've heard that the WCLC tried all kinds of measures to stop your playing.
They
were very quick to put in betting limits and pull games off their
lists. Retailers in Calgary told me that they were told by lottery
officials to not take bets from us because we were big drug dealers
from Toronto laundering money in their system. Many of the retailers
had their machines taken out for selling to us.
Once I
phoned the Western Canada lottery corporation and asked why they were
pulling games off the list and they told me that people who they
suspected of being criminal elements were over betting these games.
All these accusations of money laundering confuse me - it just seems a very inefficient way to do it ....
It
actually makes no sense. Especially when you’re up money. How are you
laundering money while winning? It’s just a smokescreen by corrupt
politicians and bureaucrats to cover up their mistakes.
Were you ever actually investigated by any police forces?
I do know that I have been investigated by police forces in Canada several times.
At the prompting of the lottery corporations?
Yes absolutely.. Definitely in both Ontario and Western Canada.
It’s
a shame that the police had to waste their time and efforts to
investigate these accusations from the lottery corporation which was
being spiteful. It never did stop us from playing at all so it’s not
like it really effected us. The Western lottery we found was the worst
of them for using dirty tactics of that nature.
 I
hope you've enjoying this transcript of my conversation with
Poindexter. I found it very difficult to convey the atmosphere of the
afternoon in written form. Much of the time was spent in laughter
recounting our episodes of betting Proline over the years. Meanwhile, a
lot of time was spent on serious discussions of how to gain an edge in
proline plays.
Although our methods are very similiar, I
was almost awed by Poindexter's ability to apply mathematics in
analyzing differing complex betting situations. I was fortunate to
receive some valuable tips on improving my own calculation of player
edges. Some of which have already been implemented for this site, and
others which are still on the drawing board.
Poindexter and Dilbert's picks are posted most days on the ########
Many players have made money consistently over the years just by
following their list of proline combos with a positive player
advantage.
Hope you've all enjoyed it - and many thanks to Poindexter!
|
|
quote |
|
Triballife |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Location: |
#18 Posted: 7/9/2010 1:35:21 AM Then one day the OLGC decided that they no longer wanted us to
redeem tickets at the store anymore. They told the retailer not to cash
our tickets for us and that if he did he would no longer be able to get
an immediate settlement for his credit balance. This would of course
lead to him having a balance with the OLGC that he might never be able
to work off. So although it says right on the ticket that that it can
be redeemed at the retailer's, this apparently didn't apply to us. The
reason probably being that they are required to pay a 2% commission to
the retailer for cashing winning tickets. To avoid this they wanted me
to go the head office in Toronto to cash all my tickets. For a while we
tried cashing them a different stores but some had their lottery
terminals closed down for aiding us. Another retailer was reimbursed
for the cash paid out but they refused to pay the commission, clearly
in violation of their contract. But I guess if you believe that you’re
above the law that doesn’t matter.
After talking to the
OLGC, we were told that we had to take all our tickets to Toronto to
cash them. So we did. We actually read the rules and follow them. It
states in the rules that the ticket control number is the only thing
which determines if a ticket is a winner or a loser. According to this
rule there’s no actual way of determining whether a ticket is a winner
without putting it through a terminal. So every ticket as far as I’m
concerned is a possible winner, there’s no way can you can know different. So we got all our possible winning tickets and filled seven garbage bags full of them and went off to Toronto.
Where you standing in the line with these bags of tickets?
I
had my mom with me at the time, she helped me carry in all the bags. As
far as I was concerned I was just another customer who wanted to check
his tickets. We were though getting looks from the other people there.
When I got to the front off the line I told them I’d brought all my
tickets in to check. They told us that we couldn’t do this. I explained
that they were all possible winners and that I was told to
bring all my tickets here for validating because I wasn’t do it at the
retailers. They said that they weren’t going to take the tickets. My
attitude was screw that you have to take them, so I just put them on
the counter and walked out.
A week later we got a letter
from the OLGC saying that they were not going to check the tickets and
that they could make the argument that I had abandoned the tickets and
they could therefore throw them out. I knew that there was no way they
would ever have thrown them out, as they were all possible
winners - they’d leave themselves open to being sued for my estimate of
their value. I know for certain that there were winners in those
tickets. Or let’s say, that some were not only possible winners but even probable winners. We did put in a few thousand dollars of worth of probable
winners just to make sure. I'm almost certain that there would have
been even more winners in the bags aside from the ones we seeded in.
Next
they sent us a letter saying that they were going to courier the
tickets back to us. I then saw my lawyer and we filed a motion in court
seeking to force them to check all the tickets. At this point their
lawyers got in touch with ours and reached a settlement. I don’t know
if I can go into this too much more without checking, as I’m not sure
if the agreement included any confidentiality clause, but I can say for
sure that they did eventually validate all the tickets.
That must have taken a while
It
took them six months to do them all. They want to have rules in place
to protect themselves but I see no reason why I can’t use the same
rules to protect myself. I told them their rules clearly state that is
only the control number which matters not what the games listed on the
ticket are. They told me that they didn’t care what the rules say and
that was it. |
|
quote |
|
garnabby |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Location: Canada |
#19 Posted: 7/10/2010 11:35:13 AM Thanks to Triballife and wmp66! Saved me a lot of trouble trying to google around it.
I will be putting a link to this page on some of the other gamblng sites i frequent.
Good site. Thanks.
Mark. |
|
quote |
|
ProlineWinner |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 94
Location: |
#20 Posted: 7/18/2010 12:12:24 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by garnabby:
Thanks to Triballife and wmp66! Saved me a lot of trouble trying to google around it.
I will be putting a link to this page on some of the other gamblng sites i frequent.
Good site. Thanks.
Mark.
Your thanks should go to http://www.prolineplayer.com/Articles/Poindexter.php
Don't mind people quoting my stuff but you should credit the source.
Thanks,
PLP
|
|
quote |
|
dj_destroyer |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports | |
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3118
Location: Ontario |
#21 Posted: 7/23/2010 10:57:24 PM |
|
quote |
|
garnabby |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Location: Canada |
#22 Posted: 7/24/2010 7:42:00 PM |
|
quote |
|
Terryo |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 379
Location: Ontario |
#23 Posted: 8/16/2010 9:38:09 AM
been many months since i have been in this forum or any forum.
Good luck to all.
|
|
quote |
|
Terryo |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 379
Location: Ontario |
#24 Posted: 8/16/2010 9:47:39 AM
|
|
quote |
|
Terryo |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 379
Location: Ontario |
#25 Posted: 8/16/2010 10:30:12 AM
|
|
quote |