Messages
Forum Index : Systems & Strategies : Messages
Author: [Systems & Strategies] Topic: Shouldn't we just FADE?
oilcountry99 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
oilcountry99
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 382
Location: Ontario
#1
Posted: 12/29/2012 10:20:27 PM
if 90% of sports bettors lose over the long term would it not be profitable to fade peoples systems or plays instead of trying to find the winning combination? Or maybe just fade your own system?
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
jaime2309
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
jaime2309
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1774
Location: California
#2
Posted: 12/30/2012 12:24:54 AM
Lol good theory....
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
curly1973 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetOnline.ag |
curly1973
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 22
Location: Kentucky
#3
Posted: 12/30/2012 10:30:49 PM
90% of all systems go 50% long term.  Most betters are terrible with money management though.  They raise their bets after a winning day and lower their bets after losing days.  It should be the other way around.  You can make consistent money only hitting 50%.  And like I said, any system that you use will go 50% long haul.
quote
oilcountry99 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
oilcountry99
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 382
Location: Ontario
#4
Posted: 12/30/2012 10:45:35 PM
What type of money management would you suggest assuming a system with a 50% win rate?

We know we need a win rate of 53.8% I believe to break even flat betting.
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
Forum Index : Systems & Strategies : Messages
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.