Messages

Originally Posted by Bodisattva:

Hi Mike, I'm sure you have to constantly deal with getting new people up to speed, but I'm looking hard at this system trying to figure out the angles.  Progressive betting has been growing on me, as it seems like it can be a very powerful tool when used with the right filter (I'm just about finished up with a NBA 2Q chase system I came up with and am posting across the street that has gone 64-0 this year). 
Any chance to get something of a historical breakdown on the two system's performances?  If I play both sides, it basically means I have to drop everything else I'm doing with MLB to avoid conflicts, so I'd like to have a solid idea of what the risk reward is.  Cisco and TerribleCapper (now across the street again) both have some well constructed systems, but the sheer volume of your system means possibly a higher end return, as long as the number of system losses is contained (15% of BR). 
I'll shoot you a friend request if you'd prefer to answer that way. 

Originally Posted by jv040:

bos was a mistake. mn didn't have a line this morning. sf opened at 100 this morning according to book maker, didn't include phi becuase when a team opens at 100 then there opponent would most likely be under -105 favored. wich would make philly a no play.