Messages

Forum Index : Systems & Strategies : Messages Page 3 of 4  1 2 3 4  
Author: [Systems & Strategies] Topic: SUPERBOWL system for Frauds 100%
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#51
Posted: 1/1/2013 7:40:58 AM
Here are the numbers...

AFC
Denver +107.125 / -1 TO
New England +54.625 / +25 TO
Houston +48.812 / +12 TO
Cincy +13 / +4 TO
Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO
Colts -11.812 / -12 TO

NFC
San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO
Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO
ATL +26.062 / +13 TO
GB +22.687 / +7 TO
Wash +5.5 / +17 TO
Minn -13.437 / -1 TO
quote
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#52
Posted: 1/1/2013 7:42:07 AM
Where can I find the Total Defense scoring rankings??
quote
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#53
Posted: 1/1/2013 7:47:14 AM
The playoff seeding kind of coincides with these rankings...
quote
Tuneman send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Tuneman
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 85
Location: United States
#54
Posted: 1/5/2013 11:26:20 AM
Thanks for picking up on this! I was hoping someone would jump in.
quote
DegenGamble send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
DegenGamble
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: New Jersey
#55
Posted: 1/5/2013 6:38:38 PM
So does this mean it will most likely be Denver vs San Fran?
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
Pendo
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Wynn Las Vegas |
Pendo
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 932
Location: Nevada
#56
Posted: 1/23/2013 3:25:00 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by VegasSB:

Here are the numbers...

AFC
Denver +107.125 / -1 TO
New England +54.625 / +25 TO
Houston +48.812 / +12 TO
Cincy +13 / +4 TO
Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO
Colts -11.812 / -12 TO

NFC
San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO
Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO
ATL +26.062 / +13 TO
GB +22.687 / +7 TO
Wash +5.5 / +17 TO
Minn -13.437 / -1 TO

So by dawniedawgs' system, SF Vs. Denver, then NE; thus the Ravens.
quote
sfg8 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
sfg8
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 285
Location:
#57
Posted: 1/26/2013 2:46:46 PM
not so sure about the system but 9ers will win and cover the 3.5 in 2013...bol
quote
Pendo
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Wynn Las Vegas |
Pendo
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 932
Location: Nevada
#58
Posted: 8/13/2013 1:55:55 AM
Once again,
system works for year '13
quote
Tuneman send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Tuneman
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 85
Location: United States
#59
Posted: 12/19/2013 2:55:32 AM
Well....is anyone following this system this year?
quote
breezeyo send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
breezeyo
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 101
Location:
#60
Posted: 12/24/2013 7:41:26 AM
Just curious how this own last year?  Balt was the worst afc team with regards to ypg?
quote
Pendo
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Wynn Las Vegas |
Pendo
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 932
Location: Nevada
#61
Posted: 12/26/2013 4:21:22 PM
System's up for '13
quote
breezeyo send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
breezeyo
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 101
Location:
#62
Posted: 12/26/2013 4:34:29 PM
I thought it was a Super Bowl system?
quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#63
Posted: 12/26/2013 5:29:41 PM
How did system win last year when they were a pathetic +1.562? The turnovers were decent but they need to be +45 or more yards ahead, on average for each opponent through 16weeks. Confused on that 
quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#64
Posted: 12/26/2013 5:31:55 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by VegasSB:

Here are the numbers...

AFC
Denver +107.125 / -1 TO
New England +54.625 / +25 TO
Houston +48.812 / +12 TO
Cincy +13 / +4 TO
Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO
Colts -11.812 / -12 TO

NFC
San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO
Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO
ATL +26.062 / +13 TO
GB +22.687 / +7 TO
Wash +5.5 / +17 TO
Minn -13.437 / -1 TO

According to this, it should of been Patriots vs Niners. Baltimore didn't even qualify!
quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#65
Posted: 12/27/2013 9:38:37 PM
I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:

Super Bowl 2014

===
AFC
===

DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +94.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 8
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (-1)

CINCINNATI: 
Yards vs opponent average: +55.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+2)

NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +13yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -27.6yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+17)

SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.6
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-3)

====
NFC - (+35yd avg to qualify)
====

NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +88.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-1)

PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +28.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

ARIZONA:
Yards vs opponent average: +24yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 7/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)

SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.1yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 26
Turnover +/-: (+18)

SAN FRANCISCO: 
Yards vs opponent average: +14.4yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.5yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)
quote
breezeyo send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
breezeyo
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 101
Location:
#66
Posted: 12/27/2013 9:47:03 PM
Look at the SOS at the afc teams as a whole.   
quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#67
Posted: 12/27/2013 10:07:15 PM
I would say front runners as of Week 16 are:

AFC:
Cincinnati - leads AFC in TD's, impressive yds vs opponent, decent ratio, and tough schedule.
New England (if they manage to increase yds in Week 17)
Denver - negative in turnovers

NFC:
New Orleans has chance but negative in turnovers
Seattle if they increase their yds vs opponent
Arizona has tougher schedule than Philly plus more scores.

Thoughts anyone???
quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#68
Posted: 12/27/2013 10:10:03 PM
I'm liking Carolina over SF too. More yards, toughest schedule, better ratio, more INT's.
quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#69
Posted: 12/27/2013 11:43:37 PM
Ill just pick up this thread to see how it does since I'm tracking it now lol. I love to handicap games so I will provid good opinion and summaries when the season wraps up. Together, I'm sure we can predict which two teams will for sure be in the SB for 2014! Update to come.....
Posted using a mobile device.
quote
supergoku send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
supergoku
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28
Location:
#70
Posted: 12/30/2013 8:38:02 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Deano-:

I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:

Super Bowl 2014

===
AFC
===

DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +94.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 8
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (-1)

CINCINNATI: 
Yards vs opponent average: +55.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+2)

NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +13yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -27.6yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+17)

SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.6
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-3)

====
NFC - (+35yd avg to qualify)
====

NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +88.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-1)

PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +28.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

ARIZONA:
Yards vs opponent average: +24yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 7/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)

SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.1yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 26
Turnover +/-: (+18)

SAN FRANCISCO: 
Yards vs opponent average: +14.4yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.5yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)


Do you have updated numbers ??? TIA
quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#71
Posted: 12/30/2013 1:53:49 PM
I will by tonight my friend 
quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#72
Posted: 12/30/2013 2:14:50 PM
Only thing that concerns me is last years results. No one has chimed in to verify why Balt was the play last year. They were only 1yd better than their opponents??? I'm going to analyze each team and make logical decisions based on the systems parameters... 
quote
breezeyo send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
breezeyo
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 101
Location:
#73
Posted: 12/30/2013 2:45:05 PM

Of those that are +35yds, only Cincinnati has a + TO ratio.  That doesn't mean I would pick them at all.    I don't see how you can bet against Seattle to win it all, based on these numbers. 

Would you pick Denver or New Orleans based on their offensive numbers...and terrible defense?   I wouldn't.  

I will be awaiting the updated numbers to see if anything stands out, but as of now my picks are Denver/Cincinatti and Seattle/Green Bay.

quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#74
Posted: 12/30/2013 10:25:47 PM
Super Bowl 2014

====
AFC
====

DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +101.3
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 9
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: Flat
ST Rank: 21

CINCINNATI: 
Yards vs opponent average: +62.9
Defensive Touchdowns: 6
Games vs Playoff Teams: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)
ST Rank: 12

NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +11.4
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
Games vs Playoff Teams: 4
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+9)
ST Rank: 2

KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -30.5
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
Games vs Playoff Teams: 6
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 21
Turnover +/-: (+18)
ST Rank: 1

SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +26.8 
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-4)
ST Rank: 15

INDIANAPOLIS:
Yards vs opponent average: -15.3
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 30/32 .471%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 15
Turnover +/-: +13
ST Rank: 17






quote
Deano- send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.ag |
Deano-
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
Location: United States
#75
Posted: 12/30/2013 10:28:53 PM

====
NFC 
====

NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +93.7
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
Games vs Playoff Teams: 6
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 12
Turnover +/-: flat
ST Rank: 24

PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.1
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
Games vs Playoff Teams: 5
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)
ST Rank: 25

GREENBAY:
Yards vs opponent average: +28
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
Games vs Playoff Teams: 3
SOS Ranking: 6/32 .533%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: -3
ST Rank: 19

SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +65.4 
Defensive Touchdowns: 4
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 28
Turnover +/-: (+20)
ST Rank: 5

SAN FRANCISCO: 
Yards vs opponent average: +6.9 
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
Games vs Playoff Teams: 8
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 18
Turnover +/-: (+12)
ST Rank: 7

CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +15.5
Defensive Touchdowns: 4
Games vs Playoff Teams: 6
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+11)
ST Rank: 13
quote
Forum Index : Systems & Strategies : Messages Page 3 of 4  1 2 3 4  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.