SUPERBOWL system for Frauds 100%

Forum: Systems & Strategies Page 3 of 5  1 2 3 4 5  
Author: [Systems & Strategies] Topic: SUPERBOWL system for Frauds 100%
VegasSB PM VegasSB
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 230
Michigan
 
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 7:40:58 AM
Here are the numbers...

AFC
Denver +107.125 / -1 TO
New England +54.625 / +25 TO
Houston +48.812 / +12 TO
Cincy +13 / +4 TO
Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO
Colts -11.812 / -12 TO

NFC
San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO
Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO
ATL +26.062 / +13 TO
GB +22.687 / +7 TO
Wash +5.5 / +17 TO
Minn -13.437 / -1 TO
VegasSB PM VegasSB
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 230
Michigan
 
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 7:42:07 AM
Where can I find the Total Defense scoring rankings??
VegasSB PM VegasSB
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 230
Michigan
 
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/1/2013 7:47:14 AM
The playoff seeding kind of coincides with these rankings...
Tuneman PM Tuneman
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 91
United States
 
Tuneman
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/5/2013 11:26:20 AM
Thanks for picking up on this! I was hoping someone would jump in.
DegenGamble PM DegenGamble
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1070
New Jersey
 
DegenGamble
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/5/2013 6:38:38 PM
So does this mean it will most likely be Denver vs San Fran?
Posted using a mobile device.
Pendo PM Pendo
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2326
Nevada
 
Pendo
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/23/2013 3:25:00 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by VegasSB:

Here are the numbers...

AFC
Denver +107.125 / -1 TO
New England +54.625 / +25 TO
Houston +48.812 / +12 TO
Cincy +13 / +4 TO
Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO
Colts -11.812 / -12 TO

NFC
San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO
Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO
ATL +26.062 / +13 TO
GB +22.687 / +7 TO
Wash +5.5 / +17 TO
Minn -13.437 / -1 TO

So by dawniedawgs' system, SF Vs. Denver, then NE; thus the Ravens.
sfg8 PM sfg8
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 334
 
sfg8
Participation Meter
Posted: 1/26/2013 2:46:46 PM
not so sure about the system but 9ers will win and cover the 3.5 in 2013...bol
Pendo PM Pendo
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2326
Nevada
 
Pendo
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/13/2013 1:55:55 AM
Once again,
system works for year '13
Tuneman PM Tuneman
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 91
United States
 
Tuneman
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/19/2013 2:55:32 AM
Well....is anyone following this system this year?
breezeyo PM breezeyo
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 101
 
breezeyo
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/24/2013 7:41:26 AM
Just curious how this own last year?  Balt was the worst afc team with regards to ypg?
Pendo PM Pendo
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2326
Nevada
 
Pendo
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/26/2013 4:21:22 PM
System's up for '13
breezeyo PM breezeyo
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 101
 
breezeyo
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/26/2013 4:34:29 PM
I thought it was a Super Bowl system?
Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/26/2013 5:29:41 PM
How did system win last year when they were a pathetic +1.562? The turnovers were decent but they need to be +45 or more yards ahead, on average for each opponent through 16weeks. Confused on that 
Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/26/2013 5:31:55 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by VegasSB:

Here are the numbers...

AFC
Denver +107.125 / -1 TO
New England +54.625 / +25 TO
Houston +48.812 / +12 TO
Cincy +13 / +4 TO
Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO
Colts -11.812 / -12 TO

NFC
San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO
Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO
ATL +26.062 / +13 TO
GB +22.687 / +7 TO
Wash +5.5 / +17 TO
Minn -13.437 / -1 TO

According to this, it should of been Patriots vs Niners. Baltimore didn't even qualify!
Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/27/2013 9:38:37 PM
I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:

Super Bowl 2014

===
AFC
===

DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +94.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 8
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (-1)

CINCINNATI: 
Yards vs opponent average: +55.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+2)

NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +13yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -27.6yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+17)

SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.6
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-3)

====
NFC - (+35yd avg to qualify)
====

NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +88.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-1)

PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +28.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

ARIZONA:
Yards vs opponent average: +24yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 7/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)

SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.1yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 26
Turnover +/-: (+18)

SAN FRANCISCO: 
Yards vs opponent average: +14.4yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.5yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)
breezeyo PM breezeyo
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 101
 
breezeyo
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/27/2013 9:47:03 PM
Look at the SOS at the afc teams as a whole.   
Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/27/2013 10:07:15 PM
I would say front runners as of Week 16 are:

AFC:
Cincinnati - leads AFC in TD's, impressive yds vs opponent, decent ratio, and tough schedule.
New England (if they manage to increase yds in Week 17)
Denver - negative in turnovers

NFC:
New Orleans has chance but negative in turnovers
Seattle if they increase their yds vs opponent
Arizona has tougher schedule than Philly plus more scores.

Thoughts anyone???
Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/27/2013 10:10:03 PM
I'm liking Carolina over SF too. More yards, toughest schedule, better ratio, more INT's.
Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/27/2013 11:43:37 PM
Ill just pick up this thread to see how it does since I'm tracking it now lol. I love to handicap games so I will provid good opinion and summaries when the season wraps up. Together, I'm sure we can predict which two teams will for sure be in the SB for 2014! Update to come.....
Posted using a mobile device.
supergoku PM supergoku
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 33
 
supergoku
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/30/2013 8:38:02 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Deano-:

I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:

Super Bowl 2014

===
AFC
===

DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +94.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 8
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (-1)

CINCINNATI: 
Yards vs opponent average: +55.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+2)

NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +13yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -27.6yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+17)

SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.6
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-3)

====
NFC - (+35yd avg to qualify)
====

NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +88.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-1)

PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +28.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

ARIZONA:
Yards vs opponent average: +24yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 7/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)

SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.1yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 26
Turnover +/-: (+18)

SAN FRANCISCO: 
Yards vs opponent average: +14.4yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.5yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)


Do you have updated numbers ??? TIA
Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/30/2013 1:53:49 PM
I will by tonight my friend 
Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/30/2013 2:14:50 PM
Only thing that concerns me is last years results. No one has chimed in to verify why Balt was the play last year. They were only 1yd better than their opponents??? I'm going to analyze each team and make logical decisions based on the systems parameters... 
breezeyo PM breezeyo
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 101
 
breezeyo
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/30/2013 2:45:05 PM

Of those that are +35yds, only Cincinnati has a + TO ratio.  That doesn't mean I would pick them at all.    I don't see how you can bet against Seattle to win it all, based on these numbers. 

Would you pick Denver or New Orleans based on their offensive numbers...and terrible defense?   I wouldn't.  

I will be awaiting the updated numbers to see if anything stands out, but as of now my picks are Denver/Cincinatti and Seattle/Green Bay.

Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/30/2013 10:25:47 PM
Super Bowl 2014

====
AFC
====

DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +101.3
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 9
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: Flat
ST Rank: 21

CINCINNATI: 
Yards vs opponent average: +62.9
Defensive Touchdowns: 6
Games vs Playoff Teams: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)
ST Rank: 12

NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +11.4
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
Games vs Playoff Teams: 4
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+9)
ST Rank: 2

KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -30.5
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
Games vs Playoff Teams: 6
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 21
Turnover +/-: (+18)
ST Rank: 1

SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +26.8 
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-4)
ST Rank: 15

INDIANAPOLIS:
Yards vs opponent average: -15.3
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 30/32 .471%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 15
Turnover +/-: +13
ST Rank: 17






Deano- PM Deano-
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 171
United States
 
Deano-
Participation Meter
Posted: 12/30/2013 10:28:53 PM

====
NFC 
====

NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +93.7
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
Games vs Playoff Teams: 6
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 12
Turnover +/-: flat
ST Rank: 24

PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.1
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
Games vs Playoff Teams: 5
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)
ST Rank: 25

GREENBAY:
Yards vs opponent average: +28
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
Games vs Playoff Teams: 3
SOS Ranking: 6/32 .533%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: -3
ST Rank: 19

SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +65.4 
Defensive Touchdowns: 4
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 28
Turnover +/-: (+20)
ST Rank: 5

SAN FRANCISCO: 
Yards vs opponent average: +6.9 
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
Games vs Playoff Teams: 8
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 18
Turnover +/-: (+12)
ST Rank: 7

CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +15.5
Defensive Touchdowns: 4
Games vs Playoff Teams: 6
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+11)
ST Rank: 13
Forum: Systems & Strategies Page 3 of 5  1 2 3 4 5  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.