| Author: |
[College Football] Topic: Wisconsin at Stanford (01/01/2013) |
|
Covers |
 View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports | |
Covers Referee
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 61
Location: Ireland |
#1 Posted: 12/2/2012 9:53:13 PM
Away:
Wisconsin
[6-7 ATS]
Home:
Stanford
[8-5 ATS]
Game Time:
5:00 PM
Stadium: Rose Bowl
Recent Meetings:
01/01/00
-
STAN 9
vs.
WISC 17
09/21/96
-
STAN 0
vs.
WISC 14
09/16/95
-
WISC 24
vs.
STAN 24
Team Leaders:
Wisconsin:
Passing:
Joel Stave
(1104)
Rushing:
Montee Ball
(1727)
Receiving:
Jared Abbrederis
(793)
Stanford:
Passing:
Josh Nunes
(1643)
Rushing:
Stepfan Taylor
(1442)
Receiving:
Zach Ertz
(837)
More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information
|
|
quote |
|
osu200200 |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1364
Location: Texas |
#2 Posted: 12/6/2012 2:50:45 PM |
|
quote |
|
Coloneljim |
RSI  |
All-Star
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11867
Location: |
#3 Posted: 12/6/2012 8:29:13 PM Stanford - 27 Wisconsin - 20
Cardinal -6.5  under 47.5
3 Rose Bowl losses in a row for the Badgers. The colonel is betting it happens. We'll be doing some gangnam style dancing when this one's over amigos 
Stanford - Under  |
|
quote |
|
royal72 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 34
Location: California |
#4 Posted: 12/12/2012 2:24:53 AM |
|
quote |
|
Buddhabud |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 288
Location: Georgia |
#5 Posted: 12/13/2012 3:06:15 PM  |
|
quote |
|
|
|
bmilehigh |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: SPORTSBETTING.AG | |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 151
Location: Colorado |
#6 Posted: 12/17/2012 4:55:44 PM
Stanford - 6 1/2
|
|
quote |
|
Coloneljim |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11867
Location: |
#7 Posted: 12/22/2012 12:17:06 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Coloneljim:
Stanford - 27 Wisconsin - 20
Cardinal -6.5 under 47.5
3 Rose Bowl losses in a row for the Badgers. The colonel is betting it happens. We'll be doing some gangnam style dancing when this one's over amigos
Stanford - Under
Oh well so much for the gangnam style dancing. Stanford DT Terrence Stephens declared ineligible for the Roses. This is a huge hit for the Cardinal team since they are thin on experience. The colonel had to re-evaluate this one, and I see it now the 6.5 just might be a bit too much here after that loss of experience & leadership.
Wisconsin - 21 Stanford - 17
Badgers +6.5  under 47.5
For some reason the dog in Stanford Bowl games seems the appropriate way to make your  ....Take Wisky and the points and 
Badgers - Under  |
|
quote |
|
Hardtimes75 |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
Location: Maryland |
#8 Posted: 12/22/2012 2:08:13 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Coloneljim: Oh well so much for the gangnam style dancing. Stanford DT Terrence Stephens declared ineligible for the Roses. This is a huge hit for the Cardinal team since they are thin on experience. The colonel had to re-evaluate this one, and I see it now the 6.5 just might be a bit too much here after that loss of experience & leadership.
Wisconsin - 21 Stanford - 17
Badgers +6.5 under 47.5
For some reason the dog in Stanford Bowl games seems the appropriate way to make your ....Take Wisky and the points and
Badgers - Under
I appreciate the info about the Stanford DT being out, but let me try to understand something here. Stanford's losing a Defensive player, but without him you have them scoring TEN fewer points & Wisconsin only scoring 1 more??? That just doesn't make any sense.
|
|
quote |
|
Coloneljim |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11867
Location: |
#9 Posted: 12/22/2012 3:04:58 PM Simple, more running the ball from Wisky, less possessions for Stanford. With a little more research I see the Cardinal scored 13 vs ND, 21 vs USC, &13 vs Washington. I compare Wisky's defense to those club's so 17 is about right. Thanks Hardtimes. It's a tough call here, like bmile said, the big 10 usually  in Rose Bowl games. Maybe Alvarez will be the answer.
GL AMIGO  |
|
quote |
|
knasty007 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 316
Location: United States |
#10 Posted: 12/24/2012 12:52:51 PM |
|
quote |
|
Nhenley |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 378
Location: Oregon |
#11 Posted: 12/29/2012 4:56:02 PM Stanford losing their DT isn't going to impact their defense that much or impact the outcome. Last time I checked, the defense has 11 players and I'm sure the other 10 players will proudly fill the plug for their injured comrade.
The only 2 positions that will impact an outcome of a game is if a team loses their starting qb and starting rb. Other than that, the coaches will find a way to improvise with the backup player, whoever that is. Having said that, Stanford wins by 2 TDS. WIsconsin is a fraud and so are the rest of the BIG10 teams. |
|
quote |
|
SportsPredictor |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 213
Location: Massachusetts |
#12 Posted: 12/30/2012 1:51:40 AM Caution on All Remaining Bowl Games!
Must use great caution on all remaining "Bowl" games. Oklahoma State throwing footballs directly into the hands (three times) of enemy players only ten yards away...TCU fumbling footballs on two yard lines...yesterday's game of a team "fumbling" footballs twice on the ONE YARD line...and all of these teams going under the Vegas spread!
And many, many "flags" even noticed by the TV commentators as "false flags".
Can't be "sour grapes" as I've been on the winning side of a few of these "disasters". But such actions, in bowl game after bowl game, no "accidents". Many have noticed the same, no doubt. Must use great caution on all remaining bowl games.
BOL   |
|
quote |
|
SportsPredictor |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 213
Location: Massachusetts |
#13 Posted: 12/30/2012 2:09:19 AM Correction above...Oregon State not Oklahoma State.
GLTA |
|
quote |
|
mak104 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 48
Location: |
#14 Posted: 12/31/2012 8:50:51 PM
|
|
quote |
|
combato |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 243
Location: Texas |
#15 Posted: 12/31/2012 9:21:22 PM
1. Consensus - solid play on Wisc with heavy pub consensus on Stanford
2. Scoring predictor shows Wisc 27, Stan 23 making Wisc a true favorite of -4.
3. No play to date on SS ML indicator
4. Strong edge to Wisc on the CE differential - the good handicappers like Wisc by a 25% margin. THis is huge when used in conjunction with consensus and scoring predictor
Play Wisconsin for 2 units - if late steam comes on Wisc, increase to 3 units.
|
|
quote |
|
volexpert |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 24
Location: |
#16 Posted: 1/1/2013 3:26:41 AM |
|
quote |
|
DrDogs |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1322
Location: Tennessee |
#17 Posted: 1/1/2013 8:50:12 AM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
combato |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 243
Location: Texas |
#18 Posted: 1/1/2013 11:05:39 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by knasty007:
STANFORD BEATS THEM BY 2 SCORES.... PLAYING AGAINST ALL BIG 10 TEAMS .....MAYBE NOT NORTWESTERN....BIG TEN SUXX
If the Big 10 sucks, why have I cashed winners on Mich St and Minn?
|
|
quote |
|
combato |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 243
Location: Texas |
#19 Posted: 1/1/2013 11:11:19 AM
|
|
quote |
|
mikeny |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1809
Location: New York |
#20 Posted: 1/1/2013 11:18:19 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by combato:
These teams are very similar in that play very physical on both sides of the ball. Both teams will run and stop the run with big tough defensive line play. Wisc is actually excited to have Alvarez on the sideline to coach the team because he is a Wisconsin legend. The team actually requested that he come down and coach this game which speaks volumes about the cohesiveness of this team and the Wisc football administration. Wisc does have the motivational edge in this game I believe. Now for the numbers that some of you love so much and some of you hate so much
1. Consensus - solid play on Wisc with heavy pub consensus on Stanford
2. Scoring predictor shows Wisc 27, Stan 23 making Wisc a true favorite of -4.
3. No play to date on SS ML indicator
4. Strong edge to Wisc on the CE differential - the good handicappers like Wisc by a 25% margin. THis is huge when used in conjunction with consensus and scoring predictor
Play Wisconsin for 2 units - if late steam comes on Wisc, increase to 3 units.
you are absolutely right. i agree 100. i dont know if wisky will win but what you said i agree with. |
|
quote |
|
JustWin001 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 26
Location: Texas |
#21 Posted: 1/1/2013 12:25:19 PM
Loss of coach could be a big positive. Alvarez is 3-0 in the Rose bowl.
Wisc +5
|
|
quote |
|
thesoulpurpose |
RSI |
Rookie
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 887
Location: Quebec |
#22 Posted: 1/1/2013 1:30:42 PM |
|
quote |
|
seanpsu124 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 160
Location: New York |
#23 Posted: 1/1/2013 1:32:06 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by bmilehigh: Wisconsin has not come close to beating a team the caliber of Stanford this year. Adding in the Big 10's Rose Bowl curse, the game won't be close.
Stanford - 6 1/2
Wisconsin lost 5 games this year...@ Oregon St, @ Penn St, @ Nebraska, Ohio St and Michigan St. Penn St, Ohio St and MSU were losses in OT and none of there losses were by more than a TD. They are not as bad as their record looks.
Wisconsin +5, under 47
|
|
quote |
|
imaxfli |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 95
Location: |
#24 Posted: 1/1/2013 1:42:28 PM
|
|
quote |
|
Buddhabud |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 288
Location: Georgia |
#25 Posted: 1/1/2013 2:30:53 PM |
|
quote |