You were ALREADY TOLD before today that the results of a single day would prove nothing. Calling Key and cjm out for a 'who will pick the more winners today' competition is bush league. If you went 3-0 today and Key and CJ went a combined 0-6, guess what? It's IRRELEVANT.
A monkey sat in front of a laptop logged into 5Dimes can go 6-0, too. It's called short-term variance. That's another gambling term you can ignore as you wish, like every other thing we've tried to explain to you so far.
You haven't discovered anything new. 'Fading the consensus' has long been a popular idea amongst casual/incompetent bettors who have neither the skill nor the patience to learn capping at an advanced, sabrmetric level. It doesn't work long term, because it's not an actual thing. But that doesn't stop people touting it, people like you who build hype around specific runs or specific days. You fall for observation bias. 'Seems to work' is good enough for you, as is selectively reporting good results and ignoring the bad.
Well it's not good enough for people who respect documented play and financial accountability.
If you've really found something wonderful, and we are all morons...PROVE it. Not by turning up on random days and trying to have person-measuring contests with respected cappers.
Make a new thread, right now, called #AntiWagerlineConsensus. Track every single pick your 'system' identifies. Track every dollar you bet on it. Track every cent you win, every cent you lose. Show that you're winning 'more than not' by tracking your overall return on investment. Show us that doing this for a year = EASY MONEY. Remove all doubt and we will be forced to love you, just as you so desperately wish.
I GUARANTEE that the longer you do it, the closer you will regress to 50%. I make that guarantee because I understand sports betting. You don't. You think you do, because you're currently in Narnia, where the president has a medal waiting for you every morning at the cashier's window. You're one the super-sharp kids up the back of the bus, fading the azz out the stupid public. Who needs records and accountability when you're a star?
Well bullshet walks, and documented threads talk. Start your own. Prove me wrong. I say you're a 50% long-term nobody. I say your anti-this, anti-that, consensus crap are make-believe shortcuts because you can't genuinely cap games. Prove me wrong. Track a season's worth of picks and show me how solid your fade theory is.
There's a reason everyone else is ignoring you now. KeyElement's threads are for people with the skills and/or interest in advanced, data-driven handicapping. We're in there for education and strategies, not the hashtaggery lameness of some idiot hyping a 'trick' that is one of the oldest, most debunked strategies in sports gambling.
I'll bet anything you want. Hell, if you can prove me wrong with a winning record and documented profit by October, I'll clean your house in a maid outfit, if that's your cheeky little wish. That should be easy for you. If you can turn up on a random day and guarantee your picks will do better than ours, then crushing a season should be easy as... well, easy as fading the wagerline consensus, right?
Don't clog people's threads up with any more of your juvenile crap until you've shown us your winning season. Prove it's not short-term variance. Show us how much units you can make in a year than Key and cjm. Stop saying it. DO IT.
Because the only reason you'd refuse to would be that you knew you were absolutely full of crap.