Messages

Forum Index : Penalty Box : Messages Page 4 of 6 «  2 3 4 5 6   »
Author: [Penalty Box] Topic: Congrats SF.......you will win the Superbowl!!!!!
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#76
Posted: 1/13/2013 11:03:48 AM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by wmi799:

He can't as he lives in a world where he knows it all and is never wrong

 

CAN YOU READ?????

 

You are in a thread in which I ADMITTED I WAS WRONG!!!!!!!!

quote
dgnowsf send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: WagerWeb.com |
dgnowsf
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2759
Location: California
#77
Posted: 1/13/2013 11:09:39 AM
accidently hit submit. 

you say, gb ran the ball better than 98% of what people thought. is that 98% of your fantasy world and the other 2% reality. you're looking based on the numbers. like i said, if you watched the game, you'll know gb didn't run the ball whatsover. packers run game has improved a little with harris the last few weeks. they did what i expected and what MOST normal / realistic people expected, not much. 

my example of cj2k is clear as day to what i'm trying to say but you keep bringing up ap. like i said, you're comparing gp run game to ap. gp held up ap but let him get loose a few times. for the most part, he was held in check, but then again, that's what ap does. he just pounds the ball repeatedly and then boom. you look at numbers and you would say cj2k ran the ball pretty good against the jets def (well actually jets rush def sucks until that game) but if you watched the game, you know for a fact that cj2k did not. this is the same with the packers. stats suggest one thing, the game suggests another. 
quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#78
Posted: 1/13/2013 11:15:03 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by dgnowsf:

accidently hit submit. 

you say, gb ran the ball better than 98% of what people thought. is that 98% of your fantasy world and the other 2% reality. you're looking based on the numbers. like i said, if you watched the game, you'll know gb didn't run the ball whatsover. packers run game has improved a little with harris the last few weeks. they did what i expected and what MOST normal / realistic people expected, not much. 

my example of cj2k is clear as day to what i'm trying to say but you keep bringing up ap. like i said, you're comparing gp run game to ap. gp held up ap but let him get loose a few times. for the most part, he was held in check, but then again, that's what ap does. he just pounds the ball repeatedly and then boom. you look at numbers and you would say cj2k ran the ball pretty good against the jets def (well actually jets rush def sucks until that game) but if you watched the game, you know for a fact that cj2k did not. this is the same with the packers. stats suggest one thing, the game suggests another. 

 

We see the exact same thing...I understand 100% your point on CJ

I think you are wrong about the GB game though.  Thats fine.

Obviously, I was in about every GB/SF.....I didnt not see 1 person who thought GB had any chance on the ground.  I saw many people say they would have under 40-30 yds.

I still think you are ruining your case by taking away the best THREE runs they had.

But, like I said, even without their best THREE runs...even if they only went for 5 yds instead....thats still 16 runs for 67 yards.

That is more than enough for Gb on the ground to have been considered a good game for GB on the ground.

If you disagree with that, which is fine, then you dont know the GB offense. 

Im not saying they dominated on the ground, but they did MUCH better than expected

quote
dgnowsf send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: WagerWeb.com |
dgnowsf
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2759
Location: California
#79
Posted: 1/13/2013 11:17:09 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

 

Holy christ man. 

You might actually be worse than me

 

yes, I was wrong about the winning and the D

 

Its still funny you keep claiming just take away a teams best 3 run plays and they didnt do anything....they arent a running team, yet you want to take away their 3 most successful plays

 

Do you do that for every game????  Just take away the 3 best plays, and that team really didnt do that good

I mean if you take away Baltimores 2 bombs and game winning fg, they really didnt win that game

 

Im admitting GB got beat, and SF did whatever they wanted to score, and youre still fighting with me


because you're saying gb ran the ball and gb didn't get shut down.

idc if you're wrong about the game. win or lose. it happens. but you're being delusional when you're stating gb ran the ball and didn't get shut down.

take away the most successful plays? dude, did you even watch the game? stop looking at numbers. you want to look at numbers and base it off that, so i am. i've been stating, if you watched the game, you know gb didn't run the ball well. but you keep bringing up how they ran over 100 yards. 

so friggin delusional. basing everything off stats. WATCH THE GAME. 

PACKERS GOT DOMINATED AND DID NOTHING. 

im done with such an idiot who can't see with his own eyes. 

im out. i'm gonna go pack. 

wait...

they already did. bunch of packers go back to gb. 


quote
dgnowsf send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: WagerWeb.com |
dgnowsf
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2759
Location: California
#80
Posted: 1/13/2013 11:18:34 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

We see the exact same thing...I understand 100% your point on CJ

I think you are wrong about the GB game though.  Thats fine.

Obviously, I was in about every GB/SF.....I didnt not see 1 person who thought GB had any chance on the ground.  I saw many people say they would have under 40-30 yds.

I still think you are ruining your case by taking away the best THREE runs they had.

But, like I said, even without their best THREE runs...even if they only went for 5 yds instead....thats still 16 runs for 67 yards.

That is more than enough for Gb on the ground to have been considered a good game for GB on the ground.

If you disagree with that, which is fine, then you dont know the GB offense. 

Im not saying they dominated on the ground, but they did MUCH better than expected


and now he tries to act all cool with a handshake 
quote
dgnowsf send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: WagerWeb.com |
dgnowsf
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2759
Location: California
#81
Posted: 1/13/2013 11:29:54 AM
i probably know the packers offense better than you. yes i know packers aren't a running team, but they have been MUCH BETTER since their bye week. they've gained 100 or more yards since their bye week in almost every one of their reg season games after the bye week, 5/7. one falling short at 96 yards against tough defensive lines as well. lions, bears, giants, vikings. 

justin smith is banged up and that's where the run stopping starts for the 49ers. so if you told me packers got 100 yards TOTAL, i wouldn't be surprised, but if you watched game, clearly they didn't run the ball well. 

i'm done, time to watch the nba game. enjoying packing. 
quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#82
Posted: 1/13/2013 11:51:44 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by dgnowsf:


and now he tries to act all cool with a handshake 

 

Man, you people on here have serious, serious mental issues.....

 

Yeah, instead of going back and forth with arguments, I tried to walk away from the issue.....

Still that wasnt good enough for you...

Instead you want to say the SAME THING over and over again.....

We disagree, get over it.  Not everybody will see eye-to-eye.

 

I think its funny though, how you just want to dismiss every good play GB had. 


For example....you say....

"Gb only scored that one TD cause a long bomb to Jones"

Does that not count???  Thats what Gb does.  They take deep shots.  So it doesnt count???  It actually should have been a TD if Rodgers doesnt under throw him, as he was behind both defenders.....

Then, going back to the running....you keep saying they didnt run the ball well....

You take away the BEST 3 runs.....how is that possible???/

On GB 1st offensive scoring drive....GB after the bomb to Jones that doesnt count, is in the red-zone on SF 18....Harris goes up the middle not touched by anybody.  So that play doesnt count???  You cant factor a 18 yard run up the middle for a touchdown???

Sounds good

Here you are saying GB got lucky on a deep bomb which they do pretty much every game during the last 2 years....then a run, right up the heart of SF defense for 18 yds not touched by anybody doesnt count.....Or a run with Cobb, who is their most dangerous weapon...Or a Qb scramble for a 3rd and long conversion in which Kaep did like 8 times doesnt count towards...

All those plays dont count

Yet, I am the one who is delusional and doesnt watch the game....

quote
sdsufred7 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
sdsufred7
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 860
Location: Philippines
#83
Posted: 1/13/2013 11:57:01 AM
NEED  A  DEFENSIVE  COORD. !!!!
quote
ATLGettinPaper
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ATLGettinPaper
Participation Meter
All-Star
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 11274
Location:
#84
Posted: 1/13/2013 12:06:10 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by SykesSystem:

haha, SF is NOT winning the SB.  GB got exposed is all that happened here.  NE is taking it


You crazy, Atlanta taking the whole thang folks been disrespecting us and anybody in our way, gone feel it.  Time for Atlanta to take that respect, nobody got to give us garbage!!!

Dirty Birds Superbowl bound!!!
quote
Crashdavis565
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes |
Crashdavis565
Participation Meter
All-Star
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 11926
Location: Colorado
#85
Posted: 1/13/2013 12:09:24 PM
do not jinx it
quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#86
Posted: 1/13/2013 12:10:00 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by sdsufred7:

NEED  A  DEFENSIVE  COORD. !!!!

 

Exactly

Capers has done well, but he has no adjusted with the new times of the NFL.

Two years ago, his type of D worked, but not anymore.

Would love to see Lovie come here, but he will probably head-coach somewhere. 

 

Williams played awful is crucial games this year, including last night.  I would like them to bring in some new linebackers and another rush end as well

quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#87
Posted: 1/13/2013 12:11:59 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by ATLGettinPaper:



You crazy, Atlanta taking the whole thang folks been disrespecting us and anybody in our way, gone feel it.  Time for Atlanta to take that respect, nobody got to give us garbage!!!

Dirty Birds Superbowl bound!!!

 

Atlanta has some of the best talent in the NFL with if not the best, the 2nd best WRs in football....

But, until Ryan can actually win a playoff game, they will not get any respect nor do they deserve it...

But, if they win today, they can be dangerous

quote
jesron1269 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jesron1269
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18631
Location: South Dakota
#88
Posted: 1/13/2013 12:18:59 PM
LETSGOPACK... just let it go.  You are never going to convince anyone of anything.  Packers were dominated at least in the second half.  They looked inferior in offense, defense and even special teams. Personally I hope your team makes no coaching changes as I think you have some of the worst coaches in the league.  There is no question that the Packers are one of the most talented teams from top to bottom but your head coach consistently puts his team in a position where if they have a big lead they sit on it and let the other team to catch up and potentially beat them (their were several examples where this has happened) and if they are behind some of his play calls I really scratch my head too.  Your defense is flashy and look good at times but they are more flash than substance.  They have some really nice parts (hence my comment about being one of the most talented teams from top to bottom) but they are far from dominate.  Not sure I can honestly say there has been a dominate defense this year as in years past.  Perhaps the closest might be Seattle.

I do not believe for a second though that you would cheer on whoever beat your team. If the Vikings won last week would that still be the case?  I doubt it.  As I said you are never going to convince anyone here in this thread so just move on.  Lets worry about today.  BOL!
quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#89
Posted: 1/13/2013 12:28:28 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by jesron1269:

LETSGOPACK... just let it go.  You are never going to convince anyone of anything.  Packers were dominated at least in the second half.  They looked inferior in offense, defense and even special teams. Personally I hope your team makes no coaching changes as I think you have some of the worst coaches in the league.  There is no question that the Packers are one of the most talented teams from top to bottom but your head coach consistently puts his team in a position where if they have a big lead they sit on it and let the other team to catch up and potentially beat them (their were several examples where this has happened) and if they are behind some of his play calls I really scratch my head too.  Your defense is flashy and look good at times but they are more flash than substance.  They have some really nice parts (hence my comment about being one of the most talented teams from top to bottom) but they are far from dominate.  Not sure I can honestly say there has been a dominate defense this year as in years past.  Perhaps the closest might be Seattle.

I do not believe for a second though that you would cheer on whoever beat your team. If the Vikings won last week would that still be the case?  I doubt it.  As I said you are never going to convince anyone here in this thread so just move on.  Lets worry about today.  BOL!

 

I agree, I just find it funny the guy is making his argument by dismissing the best 3 offensive plays they had!!!  Im not making a point that Gb was awesome, but they ran the ball better than anybody thought.....except LGPWESTCOAST

 

As for your other comments.  I actually like McCarthy.  He makes some bad choices once in awhile, but I still think he is a good coach.  He is terrible at taking the foot off the gas when he has a lead, no doubt about that.  I am still happy with what he has done since he has come here.   Capers needs to go.  The NFL has passed him by.

 

As for rooting for SF.  Like I said in a different thread, if GB loses, I want to lose to the champs.  I will not root for Sea as they robbed us, ha!!  I dont think Atl has any chance.  I cant stand NE and I think they will represent the AFC.  If Balt or Hous make it I will root for them, but I dont think they will.

I dont dislike people or teams like it seems so many do on this site.  Well, actually I dislike the Bears, ha!!!   Yeah, i would have rooted for Minn.

I only root "against" teams when they play GB.  Im a fan of the game, and want the good teams to do well.  SF is a great team and they proved it last night, and I hope they continue to do well.  It would suck as a Gb fan, if SF went out and got blasted next week, thus I hope they continue to win

quote
GMoney247 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
GMoney247
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 270
Location: United States
#90
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:28:53 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

Funny....people said all I do is make excuses. 

Defense is part of the game.

Fact is....with 7 min left in the 3rd qtr...it was 24-24.  SF didnt shut-down GB.

People said GB WONT run the ball....GB CANT PROTECT Rodgers....

Maybe SF dominated time of poss and on offense, but it doesnt change the fact that it was 24-24 in the middle of the 3rd qtr

yeah 24-24 mid 3rd quarter and 7 pts was pick 6, and gb barely had 200 yards of offense to that point... they did shut gb down, the total points doesn't tell the whole story on how the game was going. Rodgers was under pressure mostly all game with only 4 pass rushers. yeah they had 104 yards with 53  from harris most on the 1st scoring drive, 28 from rogers 23 from cobb.... thats not exactly being successful on the ground! tell me when the packers ran the ball in a critical situation and were successful! numbers don't tell the whole story so yeah 100 yards is ok, but watching the game, there is no way you can say GB had success running... you try and be classy, but make ridiculous statements like San Fran didn't shut GB down! What game were u watching?? Whole 2nd half rodgers and co were going 3 and out, 26-39 257 yards is not a good game by rodgers standards... They just got exposed in the playoffs for 2nd year in a row. no run game, and allowing Kaep to run for most yards in history for a qb... Your team is built to be a juggernaut in regular season, but that style of play fails miserably in playoff football

quote
riq send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
riq
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 781
Location: California
#91
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:30:24 PM
Is that you in the picture?

Explains EVERYTHING hahahahahahahahahah



quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#92
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:33:48 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by GMoney247:

yeah 24-24 mid 3rd quarter and 7 pts was pick 6, and gb barely had 200 yards of offense to that point... they did shut gb down, the total points doesn't tell the whole story on how the game was going. Rodgers was under pressure mostly all game with only 4 pass rushers. yeah they had 104 yards with 53  from harris most on the 1st scoring drive, 28 from rogers 23 from cobb.... thats not exactly being successful on the ground! tell me when the packers ran the ball in a critical situation and were successful! numbers don't tell the whole story so yeah 100 yards is ok, but watching the game, there is no way you can say GB had success running... you try and be classy, but make ridiculous statements like San Fran didn't shut GB down! What game were u watching?? Whole 2nd half rodgers and co were going 3 and out, 26-39 257 yards is not a good game by rodgers standards... They just got exposed in the playoffs for 2nd year in a row. no run game, and allowing Kaep to run for most yards in history for a qb... Your team is built to be a juggernaut in regular season, but that style of play fails miserably in playoff football

 

Yeah....we get it man....

Like I said....Not many people thought Gb would run the ball at all....I am willing to bet MAJORITY of people would say GB WOULD NOT get 100 yds for the game on the ground....

If more people thought they would, then I am wrong....but I am willing to bet people didnt think they would get that

Im not saying the dominated on the ground, but they did MUCH better than most people thought

quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#93
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:34:56 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by riq:

Is that you in the picture?

Explains EVERYTHING hahahahahahahahahah



 

Yeah it is.  Whats wrong with it???

With my nephew at Disney.  Whats wrong with that???

 

Is that you in your pic???  Sweet TAT man

quote
ShadowWarrior send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ShadowWarrior
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7067
Location: Hawaii
#94
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:43:05 PM
Atlanta better have a game plan to stop Kolin or SF will be in the SB for sure.
quote
GMoney247 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
GMoney247
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 270
Location: United States
#95
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:43:44 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

Yeah....we get it man....

Like I said....Not many people thought Gb would run the ball at all....I am willing to bet MAJORITY of people would say GB WOULD NOT get 100 yds for the game on the ground....

If more people thought they would, then I am wrong....but I am willing to bet people didnt think they would get that

Im not saying the dominated on the ground, but they did MUCH better than most people thought

Who cares about 100 yards and if anyone thought they would?? My question is were they meaningful yards? Did they convert any short yardage 3rd downs, did they have any big runs to set up scores? Did they run consistently to keep the Defense honest? My answers to all those are NO! Youre way off base with your statement that the packers had success on the ground!

quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#96
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:45:23 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by ShadowWarrior:

Atlanta better have a game plan to stop Kolin or SF will be in the SB for sure.

 

It looks like they are doing good now, but they are CRASHING EVERYTHING....

I cant believe Wilson is not running to the outside....its WIDE OPEN....

If they do this same D next week, Kaep will run for almost 200 again

quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#97
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:47:25 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by GMoney247:

Who cares about 100 yards and if anyone thought they would?? My question is were they meaningful yards? Did they convert any short yardage 3rd downs, did they have any big runs to set up scores? Did they run consistently to keep the Defense honest? My answers to all those are NO! Youre way off base with your statement that the packers had success on the ground!

 

I think Harris had a 18 yard run up the middle not getting touched for a TD

Rodgers had a run that led to points

Do those not count???

 

Yes, I think they ran enough to keep the D honest.....how many sacks did SF get????   ALOT LESS than you thought going into the game correct???

quote
Macwestie1 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Macwestie1
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 90570
Location: Ontario
#98
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:47:40 PM
Hey Fellas don't tell anyone but there's another game going on right now ..... Seattle @ Atlanta 

who does everyone like?
quote
GMoney247 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
GMoney247
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 270
Location: United States
#99
Posted: 1/13/2013 2:59:25 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

I think Harris had a 18 yard run up the middle not getting touched for a TD

Rodgers had a run that led to points

Do those not count???

 

Yes, I think they ran enough to keep the D honest.....how many sacks did SF get????   ALOT LESS than you thought going into the game correct???

Yeah i already stated in my last post on their 1st scoring drive they ran ok, after that drive they had no success... If Aaron Rodgers scrambling on a pass is the best run the pack had all night then thats not having success running the ball!! I think they only had 1 sack, but the pressure was there all night... i would say 25% of his dropbacks he was scrambling out of the pocket or taking a hit... 1 sack, but they did get plenty of pressure

quote
LETGOPACK1234 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: GTbets.eu |
LETGOPACK1234
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9466
Location: Illinois
#100
Posted: 1/13/2013 3:08:00 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by GMoney247:

Yeah i already stated in my last post on their 1st scoring drive they ran ok, after that drive they had no success... If Aaron Rodgers scrambling on a pass is the best run the pack had all night then thats not having success running the ball!! I think they only had 1 sack, but the pressure was there all night... i would say 25% of his dropbacks he was scrambling out of the pocket or taking a hit... 1 sack, but they did get plenty of pressure

 

Man....im done responding to the same subject.

 

You people are funny.  You keep saying take away a couple plays or a couple drives and they didnt do anything.....

I mean come on????

You cant take away anything....

Its unfair to say take away a few plays or drives to talk about what a team did during THE GAME.....

Gb isnt a running team....

They arent going to pound the ball 25+ for 150 yds....

Rodgers gets big runs often....Cobb gets big runs often....you cant not count those

 

And, if you think that if Rodgers scrambling on 25% of his passes means pressure from the D...you dont watch GB enough

 

 

quote
Forum Index : Penalty Box : Messages Page 4 of 6 «  2 3 4 5 6   »
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.