This is my first play of the year for CBB. I've never been a regular better of college hoops any year but I usually have a few plays in by now,just being an action person.
This year I wasn't too interested and then pucks went from no season into high gear and I've been in a trance ever since. For tomorrow I have made my first play of the year right before the madness kicks off and honestly it has almost zero capping and is basically a pure homer play. Although I do like the coach,the program and that they start the tourney on familiar ground.
///////////////
MARCH MADNESS:
(1)MICH ST to win it all (baby) +2000 risking a half unit (to win 10)
///////////////////
Now when it comes to the actual head to head games I still have zero knowledge of the teams (this season) and seriously couldn't name a single player in the tourney for the first time in a few years. And I have only a basic idea of whats going on with the programs but thats also from the past few years of d-gen'in through the madness and in this sport it rollover is crazy so things change a ton from year to year so my gameplan is not based on the teams.coaches and player but more on a few angles I think can be exploited.
And what has worked well in the past,albeit with more background knowledge of the teams is watching line movement and learning that these next few weeks attracts a bunch of public money and they love their faves and teams the "should" win based almost purely on their name and pedigree.
What I'm going to look for are FH ML dogs,and dogs on the spread for the entire game,potentially in the same game. Over the past few years I've learned (the hard way) that often heavy faves start the game tense,tired or they take their opponent for granted or who knows. But for whatever reason they come outta the gate slow and some decent ML dogs hit in the first half. Then the better team makes adjustments and settles in and does enough to get the win. And if it's in the early rounds they don't keep the hammer down and win the game but don't cover the big double digit spread perhaps trying to save their legs.
So long story relatively short I like dogs on the ML in the FH and then with the points for the game. And in certain spots on the ML for the game as well.
And I know it's not exactly the same but haven't we seen a pattern like this with the MIA HEAT a few times recently where they face a team thats JACKED to play them and hoping to knock the king off his throne ?? And they give a decent effort but by the time the final whistle goes the better team has the W. Maybe not a cover but a win which for underdog backs is just fine.
The CAVS and CELTS come to mind
Just a few thoughts,love to hear yours,BOL and may the madness begin.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
This is my first play of the year for CBB. I've never been a regular better of college hoops any year but I usually have a few plays in by now,just being an action person.
This year I wasn't too interested and then pucks went from no season into high gear and I've been in a trance ever since. For tomorrow I have made my first play of the year right before the madness kicks off and honestly it has almost zero capping and is basically a pure homer play. Although I do like the coach,the program and that they start the tourney on familiar ground.
///////////////
MARCH MADNESS:
(1)MICH ST to win it all (baby) +2000 risking a half unit (to win 10)
///////////////////
Now when it comes to the actual head to head games I still have zero knowledge of the teams (this season) and seriously couldn't name a single player in the tourney for the first time in a few years. And I have only a basic idea of whats going on with the programs but thats also from the past few years of d-gen'in through the madness and in this sport it rollover is crazy so things change a ton from year to year so my gameplan is not based on the teams.coaches and player but more on a few angles I think can be exploited.
And what has worked well in the past,albeit with more background knowledge of the teams is watching line movement and learning that these next few weeks attracts a bunch of public money and they love their faves and teams the "should" win based almost purely on their name and pedigree.
What I'm going to look for are FH ML dogs,and dogs on the spread for the entire game,potentially in the same game. Over the past few years I've learned (the hard way) that often heavy faves start the game tense,tired or they take their opponent for granted or who knows. But for whatever reason they come outta the gate slow and some decent ML dogs hit in the first half. Then the better team makes adjustments and settles in and does enough to get the win. And if it's in the early rounds they don't keep the hammer down and win the game but don't cover the big double digit spread perhaps trying to save their legs.
So long story relatively short I like dogs on the ML in the FH and then with the points for the game. And in certain spots on the ML for the game as well.
And I know it's not exactly the same but haven't we seen a pattern like this with the MIA HEAT a few times recently where they face a team thats JACKED to play them and hoping to knock the king off his throne ?? And they give a decent effort but by the time the final whistle goes the better team has the W. Maybe not a cover but a win which for underdog backs is just fine.
The CAVS and CELTS come to mind
Just a few thoughts,love to hear yours,BOL and may the madness begin.
yes pretty interesting ,,, how about miami at celtics the other night and today cavaliers vs heat , in both games heat were trailing by over 20 points at half. good luck on your play.
0
yes pretty interesting ,,, how about miami at celtics the other night and today cavaliers vs heat , in both games heat were trailing by over 20 points at half. good luck on your play.
Both of those teams were "undermanned" but came out swinging for the fences ala Ike Turner. Looked like they were gonna cruise to a lopsided victory. And then like so many underdogs they ran outta gas and fell short of that W.......but the fave was still nowhere near a cover.
0
Thats what I'm saying man.
Both of those teams were "undermanned" but came out swinging for the fences ala Ike Turner. Looked like they were gonna cruise to a lopsided victory. And then like so many underdogs they ran outta gas and fell short of that W.......but the fave was still nowhere near a cover.
They both score about 75 and allow 65 and the total is 140. I'm thinking against each other they may get the same amount but allow a few more. And with MEM likely being able to heave from downtown all game this one should be played in the 70's.
0
Any thoughts/leans on the ST.MARY/MEM OVER ??
They both score about 75 and allow 65 and the total is 140. I'm thinking against each other they may get the same amount but allow a few more. And with MEM likely being able to heave from downtown all game this one should be played in the 70's.
I'm not a fan of laying so many points with a 1 vs 16 but I like the
GONZAGA and since I moved out west I get a decent amount of their games
so their kinda my new team by geographical default.
Plus with their best player being a fellow Canadian they get even
more coverage up here and I see them on the highlights regularly. And
from what I've seen they seem to be the real deal so I'll give it a shot
today root in my new team. And I like rooting for a smaller 5000
student school (albeit a private one) make a run at the big boys.
0
I'm not a fan of laying so many points with a 1 vs 16 but I like the
GONZAGA and since I moved out west I get a decent amount of their games
so their kinda my new team by geographical default.
Plus with their best player being a fellow Canadian they get even
more coverage up here and I see them on the highlights regularly. And
from what I've seen they seem to be the real deal so I'll give it a shot
today root in my new team. And I like rooting for a smaller 5000
student school (albeit a private one) make a run at the big boys.
MARQ started real slow down 12-2 outta the gate but if it's close at
the half I'm gonna take a look at them for the SH. They've been bigger
and strong and inside a ton,just weren't finishing. Maybe some nerves
and the settle in as the game goes on.....we'll see
0
MARQ started real slow down 12-2 outta the gate but if it's close at
the half I'm gonna take a look at them for the SH. They've been bigger
and strong and inside a ton,just weren't finishing. Maybe some nerves
and the settle in as the game goes on.....we'll see
Sheesh that was getting rough there with MARQ losing my FH ML play by a bucket and then winning the SH by 3 when I had them -3.5 so I lost by the fuckin hook.
But I just edged out the O 120 in the ORE/OKST game so maybe things are turning around.
Getting back on the pony with.
CBB:
(1)MICH -5 -265 to SoDAKST/MICH O 133 -230 = +100 risking 0.25 units
(2)Double result MICH/MICH -270 to Double result SYR/SYR -400 to Double result NEW-MEX/NEW-MEX -250 = +140 risking 0.2 units
0
Sheesh that was getting rough there with MARQ losing my FH ML play by a bucket and then winning the SH by 3 when I had them -3.5 so I lost by the fuckin hook.
But I just edged out the O 120 in the ORE/OKST game so maybe things are turning around.
Getting back on the pony with.
CBB:
(1)MICH -5 -265 to SoDAKST/MICH O 133 -230 = +100 risking 0.25 units
(2)Double result MICH/MICH -270 to Double result SYR/SYR -400 to Double result NEW-MEX/NEW-MEX -250 = +140 risking 0.2 units
Honest mistake here. The MISSO/COL U 143.5 was for 0.2 units not for 2 full units. I think by the way I've been sprinkling it's obvious I wasn't dropping 10 times my largest bet of the day on one play.
And for the record I did this the other day with COL to score the 3rd goal of the game and said to win 2 units instead of 0.2 and they did score the 3rd goal and I was honest and said it was 0.2 even though it had won so I think I can can be trusted to be honest again here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DDH420:
CBB:
(1)MISSO/COL U 143.5 -110 to win 2 units
/////////////////
(2)AKRON FH ML +215 risking 0.1 units
(3)AKRON (game) +7.5 -110
Honest mistake here. The MISSO/COL U 143.5 was for 0.2 units not for 2 full units. I think by the way I've been sprinkling it's obvious I wasn't dropping 10 times my largest bet of the day on one play.
And for the record I did this the other day with COL to score the 3rd goal of the game and said to win 2 units instead of 0.2 and they did score the 3rd goal and I was honest and said it was 0.2 even though it had won so I think I can can be trusted to be honest again here.
Creighton's shooting seem to be their best asset and if they can get an early it may be hard for CINCY to come back,just like most defensive oriented teams.
My only concern is that the 12 days off for Creighton has them come out a lil flat. But shooters that could should find their groove soon enough.
CBB:
(1)CREIGHTON -3 -105 to win 0.15 units
0
Creighton's shooting seem to be their best asset and if they can get an early it may be hard for CINCY to come back,just like most defensive oriented teams.
My only concern is that the 12 days off for Creighton has them come out a lil flat. But shooters that could should find their groove soon enough.
Nice lil bounce back to start the day 3-0 for 0.65 units.
And I was gonna take J-MAD and the points since IND looks too easy as the huge fave in the #1 seed.
I think they line may be a few buckets to high but I'm not betting against this INDY team. Teasing the line and taking them to the over. Calling it 77-58 IND
CBB:
(1)IND -15 -245 to IND/J-MAD O 129 -240 = +100 risking 0.2 units
0
Nice lil bounce back to start the day 3-0 for 0.65 units.
And I was gonna take J-MAD and the points since IND looks too easy as the huge fave in the #1 seed.
I think they line may be a few buckets to high but I'm not betting against this INDY team. Teasing the line and taking them to the over. Calling it 77-58 IND
CBB:
(1)IND -15 -245 to IND/J-MAD O 129 -240 = +100 risking 0.2 units
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.