-gulbis +185 1 to win 1.85 Gulbis is on fire and federer showed weakness losing a set and having a fairly close match with tursunov. I can see a 4 or 5 set match, very close, with gulbis having more than a decent chance to win here
Berd/gulbis o41 -100 1 to win 1 Just missed the 40.5 but i dont think itll matter. Surely isner can win a set the way he has been playing, proven by the victoey by robredo. I think isner wins 1 set and the score line looks like 76 67 75 64 for berd
-gulbis +185 1 to win 1.85 Gulbis is on fire and federer showed weakness losing a set and having a fairly close match with tursunov. I can see a 4 or 5 set match, very close, with gulbis having more than a decent chance to win here
Berd/gulbis o41 -100 1 to win 1 Just missed the 40.5 but i dont think itll matter. Surely isner can win a set the way he has been playing, proven by the victoey by robredo. I think isner wins 1 set and the score line looks like 76 67 75 64 for berd
Adding: Tsonga/djoker o36 -100 1 to win 1 I think tsonga is playing very well and focused and that will allow him to atleast grab a set here. Likely 3-1 djoker with longer sets.
Adding: Tsonga/djoker o36 -100 1 to win 1 I think tsonga is playing very well and focused and that will allow him to atleast grab a set here. Likely 3-1 djoker with longer sets.
Is anyone else extra weary of over/unders in the best of 5 format? I personally prefer the 3 set format, so many more variables in the 5 setters. For example the raonic o/u tomorrow. He should win in 3 but granolla might squeeze a set so i cant touch it. Line moved to -6 which is tempting but ive been burned so much by granolla this year who knows
Is anyone else extra weary of over/unders in the best of 5 format? I personally prefer the 3 set format, so many more variables in the 5 setters. For example the raonic o/u tomorrow. He should win in 3 but granolla might squeeze a set so i cant touch it. Line moved to -6 which is tempting but ive been burned so much by granolla this year who knows
Big shock ... Jtmoneybaggz with more clerical errors. You were down .3 units yesterday with Gasquet pending. But apparently you didn't want to factor in that loss? You are quickly becoming one of the biggest losers I have seen on this site ... and that is quite the accomplishment.
Big shock ... Jtmoneybaggz with more clerical errors. You were down .3 units yesterday with Gasquet pending. But apparently you didn't want to factor in that loss? You are quickly becoming one of the biggest losers I have seen on this site ... and that is quite the accomplishment.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.