, I however need them to win Monday I already won one of my brackets for only 300, but if Michigan wins I win my other bracket and that one is like 1200, so lets go Blue!! They did however get extremely lucky vs Kansas I feel like their odds of winning that game were prob less than 0.5% at one point during that game
0
, I however need them to win Monday I already won one of my brackets for only 300, but if Michigan wins I win my other bracket and that one is like 1200, so lets go Blue!! They did however get extremely lucky vs Kansas I feel like their odds of winning that game were prob less than 0.5% at one point during that game
I guess for the most part you need a little luck to win these championships though see Duke /Lattener, unless of course you are the UNC team that wins by double digits every game, but this year with the parity you figured the winner would have to survive some close games, although Louisville only test so far has been Wichita
0
I guess for the most part you need a little luck to win these championships though see Duke /Lattener, unless of course you are the UNC team that wins by double digits every game, but this year with the parity you figured the winner would have to survive some close games, although Louisville only test so far has been Wichita
Yeah I actually have Michigan winning it all I know it is opportunistic but I would rather have that then be on a team that everyone is on like Louisville to win it, better chance of taking home the cash in big pools, what made the win that much better is burke didn't play well at all it is a good sign for them that they can rely on the others I wasn't expecting robinson to play like that
And it is actually Louisville ha, I didn't even remember that part of what I said. Now just one more Michigan one more!!
0
Posted: 3/21/2013 9:24:14 PM
Yeah I actually have Michigan winning it all I know it is opportunistic but I would rather have that then be on a team that everyone is on like Louisville to win it, better chance of taking home the cash in big pools, what made the win that much better is burke didn't play well at all it is a good sign for them that they can rely on the others I wasn't expecting robinson to play like that
And it is actually Louisville ha, I didn't even remember that part of what I said. Now just one more Michigan one more!!
Cowboys you are exactly right - most of the champions over the years get lucky here and there during a game or two, or maybe in a half,
Mich got theirs when they were down 14 with like 3 mins to go vs Kansas, but at the end of the day, they won the game, period.
Then they dominated FLA and most of the game they controlled Cuse even though Mich star Burke and pretty much Hardaway were nowhere to be found on offense. They are a great team and their youngsters especially McGary, grew up faster than I thought they could.
Regardless of what happens tonight, you have made the great calls I have ever seen in terms of "sleeper" type team making a run.
Last 4 seed I remember making a great run like this was 1997 Arizona, who beat three, count em THREE #1 seeds then cut down the nets.
0
Cowboys you are exactly right - most of the champions over the years get lucky here and there during a game or two, or maybe in a half,
Mich got theirs when they were down 14 with like 3 mins to go vs Kansas, but at the end of the day, they won the game, period.
Then they dominated FLA and most of the game they controlled Cuse even though Mich star Burke and pretty much Hardaway were nowhere to be found on offense. They are a great team and their youngsters especially McGary, grew up faster than I thought they could.
Regardless of what happens tonight, you have made the great calls I have ever seen in terms of "sleeper" type team making a run.
Last 4 seed I remember making a great run like this was 1997 Arizona, who beat three, count em THREE #1 seeds then cut down the nets.
yeah i think a lot of people had Michigan to be honest
i watch ESPN a lot and listen to sports talk radio a ton,
person VITALE was the only pundit i heard out of at least 13 or so pundits who pick the games, who even had Mich in the Final 4 let alone the champ game,
most pundits had KU, FLA, G'Town, and Jay Bilas had VCU in the final 4 in that region.
Mich was discounted mainly because they have 3 key frosh who did not look good the last 2-3 weeks of the season and vs Wisky in the BIG 10 tourney,
0
Quote Originally Posted by pie11:
yeah i think a lot of people had Michigan to be honest
i watch ESPN a lot and listen to sports talk radio a ton,
person VITALE was the only pundit i heard out of at least 13 or so pundits who pick the games, who even had Mich in the Final 4 let alone the champ game,
most pundits had KU, FLA, G'Town, and Jay Bilas had VCU in the final 4 in that region.
Mich was discounted mainly because they have 3 key frosh who did not look good the last 2-3 weeks of the season and vs Wisky in the BIG 10 tourney,
i watch ESPN a lot and listen to sports talk radio a ton,
person VITALE was the only pundit i heard out of at least 13 or so pundits who pick the games, who even had Mich in the Final 4 let alone the champ game,
most pundits had KU, FLA, G'Town, and Jay Bilas had VCU in the final 4 in that region.
Mich was discounted mainly because they have 3 key frosh who did not look good the last 2-3 weeks of the season and vs Wisky in the BIG 10 tourney,
I actually meant cappers not those idiot pundits lol. They usually always pick chalk anyway
0
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
i watch ESPN a lot and listen to sports talk radio a ton,
person VITALE was the only pundit i heard out of at least 13 or so pundits who pick the games, who even had Mich in the Final 4 let alone the champ game,
most pundits had KU, FLA, G'Town, and Jay Bilas had VCU in the final 4 in that region.
Mich was discounted mainly because they have 3 key frosh who did not look good the last 2-3 weeks of the season and vs Wisky in the BIG 10 tourney,
I actually meant cappers not those idiot pundits lol. They usually always pick chalk anyway
not hedging either...unless i get a nice live play.
hope you did get a live play when cardinals was down 12 points..that would be a nice live play but I doubt a book have live play around 2 mins left in 1h.....but if they do I bet it be a nice live play
0
Quote Originally Posted by sims_key:
oh, i know, believe me....not complaining though.
not hedging either...unless i get a nice live play.
hope you did get a live play when cardinals was down 12 points..that would be a nice live play but I doubt a book have live play around 2 mins left in 1h.....but if they do I bet it be a nice live play
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
